audison or alpine amps? 4chan/mono

[daveofstrength]

ALPINE -
4 channel(speakers) - http://www.alpine-usa.com/US-en/prod...&lang=en&tab=D

mono(subs) -
http://www.alpine-usa.com/US-en/prod...&lang=en&tab=D

AUDISON! -
4 channel(speakers) -
http://www.audison.eu/index_main.php?Section=LRX45
mono(subs) -
http://www.audison.eu/index_main.php?Section=LRX11k

which would be a better choice? obviously the ALPINES are much more powerful? im torn since audison is a top tier premier brand and company...

i think the audisons are entry lvl the models i picked however alpines are top lvl?

please help me in deciding with comparisons, spec diffrences and what really matters... etc

thanks

-dave

[daveofstrength]

bump

[Durrby]

You'd probably get more of a response if this were posted in the appropriate forum.

[daveofstrength]

the alpine 4 channel is 600 watts 150x4
audison is 300 75x4
alpine mono is 1000 watts
audison is 420 watts

all this at 4 ohms..

the power differential is so drastic so i was a bit worried...

alpine also underrates there products i hear.

[xet]

if you are open to other suggestions i would say a cadence 4 channel they were having a sale a while ago im not sure if it is still going on and those are top notch amps

[daveofstrength]

bump i went with the audisons even though they were so much lower in power wattage?

[Blackhawk3D]

You're not going to hear a sound difference with either at the same volume unless you're overdriving the lower powered amp, and you'll have plenty of power with the Audison's I would think. Amp designs these days are so good and it's become so well known that any solid state amp from a pro manufacturer such as Alpine or Audisson is going to be pretty much indistinguishable from another. It's all in the source and the drivers for car audio. Argue with me all you want, it's been hashed an rehashed over at DIYMA and I agree with those on the "sounds the same" side. Now, Tube vs. SS is a whole nother can of worms...