3rd & 4th Generation (1992–1996 & 1997–2001)Toyota Camry Discussion for years: 1992-1996 & 1997-2001
Topics of discussion range from fuel economy, safety, modifications, performance all involving America's favorite family car, the Toyota Camry.
Just scratching my head over this one. Has anyone noticed that the in gen3 - 3.5's, the I4's have bigger sway bars than the V6's. Why is that? My guess is the heavier V6's have stronger spring rates, they don't need as bigger bars. However, if one has stronger spring, and smaller sway bars, and the other has softer spring, and bigger sway bars, wouldn't that give both the V6, and the I4 the same level of handling? There's not that much difference between the front sway bars. About 23mm front for the V6, and about 24mm front for the I4. However, the rear bar is much bigger in the the I4. About 15mm for the V6, and 17mm for the I4. The only exception would be the SE V6 which uses a 17mm bar just like the I4.
So then, if I had the V6 (which I don't), couldn't I just install the front and rear sway bars from an I4 on my V6. Or, are there major differences in the chassis configuration between the I4 and V6 that wouldn't allow the swap?
I don't see any major differences, but I've been wrong before.
I don't know, just somthing I've thinking about the past few days.
The rear sways would definitely fit. The front should too cause the suspension is the same. I dunno about you, but I had a 21mm Whiteline rear sway, it was WAY better than stock.
upgrading from 15-17mm wont give you enough difference to go through all the hassle of labor for ... you would want to get something upwards of 19mm, IMO
also, you would want to downgrade your FSB for better handling (more body roll, but less understeer - a good trade-off, if you ask me)
__________________
R.I.P. '95 Camry LE | Welcome "Blurple" '96 240SX SE Buy My Weapon-R Intake [Here] http://sck388.mybrute.com
The rear sways would definitely fit. The front should too cause the suspension is the same. I dunno about you, but I had a 21mm Whiteline rear sway, it was WAY better than stock.
21mm? What's the part number of that one? The only Whiteline RSB I've found for my 96 is the 18mm BTR36.
upgrading from 15-17mm wont give you enough difference to go through all the hassle of labor for ... you would want to get something upwards of 19mm, IMO
This is only my 2nd post here and yet I'm already committing the faux pas of digging up a 3-year-old post from the grave! However, as an engineer, I feel compelled to comment about the relative stiffness of the 15mm vs. 17mm bars.
A 2mm difference doesn't sound like much, but if two sway bars are otherwise the same (shape, material, solid vs. hollow) as the two OE bars should be, the torsional stiffness is proportional to the fourth power of the radius. So, here's what you get:
15mm: 15/2 = 7.5; 7.5^4 = 3164
17mm: 17/2 = 8.5; 8.5^4 = 5220
5220/3164 = 1.65
Thus, the 17mm bar is 65% stiffer than the 15mm bar. Doing the math again, the Whiteline 18mm bar is 107% stiffer than a 15mm, and 25% stiffer than a 17mm. So, you can see that even a meager 2 or 3mm increase in diameter can provide a significant change in stiffness.
-Shawn
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Shawn_D For This Useful Post:
Is there anything any stiffer about wagon rear bars? I know the springs are heavier. Just wondering if finding and installing a set of Whiteline bars would be worth doing on the wagon?
Sway bars should be the last thing you change. For the most part, anti-sway bars do provide reduced body roll, but they have the unfortunate habit of reducing suspension independence as you increase the torsional stiffness.
The best way to reduce body roll is to use a stiffly sprung linear spring, then use a much smaller sway bar or none at all. They are good at keeping the wheels from leaving the pavement during hard cornering, but I have a hard time believing the Camry will put a wheel up with its cushy suspension.
I suppose most people go for sway bars because they're the easier to change, but just remember that the higher stiffness you use, the less grip you have available. This is because the torsional stiffness acts as a catalyst and pushes the tires closer to their limits. That's why if you increase the rear bar stiffness, you lose rear grip faster, and gain oversteer as the fronts will have more traction.
__________________
1991 Toyota MR2 V6
Ported, rebuilt 3.0L 1MZ
Fully OBDII compliant and California smog legal
Last edited by Jason.MZW20; 12-19-2010 at 01:18 AM.
That's why if you increase the rear bar stiffness, you lose rear grip faster, and gain oversteer as the fronts will have more traction.
That's not entirely true, at least it wasn't for me. Where I am half of the year you are driving on a loose surface, and have very little traction anyways. In the winter it's snow, then comes spring and it's dirt left over from snow removal.
On a loose surface I found that the body roll had enough momentum in the rear to kick the wheels out under an aggressive turn, The TRD rear swaybar prevented the rear from gaining enough force in turn to do that, as easily.
Sway bars should be the last thing you change. For the most part, anti-sway bars do provide reduced body roll, but they have the unfortunate habit of reducing suspension independence as you increase the torsional stiffness.
The best way to reduce body roll is to use a stiffly sprung linear spring, then use a much smaller sway bar or none at all. They are good at keeping the wheels from leaving the pavement during hard cornering, but I have a hard time believing the Camry will put a wheel up with its cushy suspension.
That's a good philosophy, but when you're talking about a relatively limited set of suspension options for something like a Gen 3 Camry, it's kind of academic whether you change to another OE rear bar or even an aftermarket one before going with springs. Individually-selected coil-over springs aside, I'd bet that like other cars, most every aftermarket spring set for a Camry increases the front and rear spring stiffness the same proportion and thus provides the same balance as OE (i.e. understeer); any readily-available rear bar probably isn't going to turn the car into a twitchy tail-happy ride.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason.MZW20
I suppose most people go for sway bars because they're the easier to change, but just remember that the higher stiffness you use, the less grip you have available. This is because the torsional stiffness acts as a catalyst and pushes the tires closer to their limits. That's why if you increase the rear bar stiffness, you lose rear grip faster, and gain oversteer as the fronts will have more traction.
It's no different if you increase rear roll stiffness via springs, though. This is why I went with Dinan springs on my 535i; they're only 3/4" lower than stock and while they're not as stiff as something like H&R or Spax, the increase in stiffness was relatively greater for the rear springs, changing the balance in the manner I wanted -- less understeer (more oversteer).
Shawn, you're right, of course. Most spring manufacturers don't really change much, but the Camry could use a stiffer rear spring anyway. I regularly see Camrys nearly bottomed out with 3 people in the rear and maybe some stuff in the trunk. I think Toyota made it a bit TOO soft. Couple that with the weight change on acceleration, and it looks ridiculous.
I've been playing with my sway bar endlinks on my MR2 because I had this nagging issue: front end washout and extreme tracking. The endlinks weren't adjusted to the new ride height (approx. 1.6 inches lower), so because the endlinks were closer to the bar and strut housing, there was even more tension. I had to lengthen the endlinks to make them parallel with the strut and increase the leverage. Now, the front tires don't washout resulting in improved balance and the car doesn't track as heavily. Steering effort has also been reduced, so I can flick the wheel again. Having to fight with the car is never fun.
__________________
1991 Toyota MR2 V6
Ported, rebuilt 3.0L 1MZ
Fully OBDII compliant and California smog legal
The AutoGuide.com network consists of the largest network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
AutoGuide.com provides the latest car reviews, auto show coverage, new car prices, and automotive news. The AutoGuide network operates more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share opinions as a community.
ToyotaNation.com is an independent Toyota/Lexus enthusiast website. ToyotaNation.com is not sponsored by or in any way affiliated with Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. The Toyota, Lexus and Scion names and logos are trademarks owned by Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.