I4 has bigger sway bars than V6? - Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums


» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums > Toyota Passenger and Sports Car Forums > Camry and Solara Forum > 3rd & 4th Generation (1992–1996 & 1997–2001)

3rd & 4th Generation (1992–1996 & 1997–2001) Toyota Camry Discussion for years: 1992-1996 & 1997-2001 Topics of discussion range from fuel economy, safety, modifications, performance all involving America's favorite family car, the Toyota Camry.

ToyotaNation.com is the premier Toyota Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-17-2007, 02:41 PM   #1 (permalink)
How hard could it be?
 
uibalnme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Inglewood, CA
Posts: 1,638
Gameroom cash: $445645
Thanks: 0
Thanked 74 Times in 69 Posts
iTrader Score: 4 reviews
View uibalnme's Photo Gallery
I4 has bigger sway bars than V6?

Just scratching my head over this one. Has anyone noticed that the in gen3 - 3.5's, the I4's have bigger sway bars than the V6's. Why is that? My guess is the heavier V6's have stronger spring rates, they don't need as bigger bars. However, if one has stronger spring, and smaller sway bars, and the other has softer spring, and bigger sway bars, wouldn't that give both the V6, and the I4 the same level of handling? There's not that much difference between the front sway bars. About 23mm front for the V6, and about 24mm front for the I4. However, the rear bar is much bigger in the the I4. About 15mm for the V6, and 17mm for the I4. The only exception would be the SE V6 which uses a 17mm bar just like the I4.

So then, if I had the V6 (which I don't), couldn't I just install the front and rear sway bars from an I4 on my V6. Or, are there major differences in the chassis configuration between the I4 and V6 that wouldn't allow the swap?
I don't see any major differences, but I've been wrong before.

I don't know, just somthing I've thinking about the past few days.
uibalnme is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-17-2007, 02:54 PM   #2 (permalink)
One with the force
 
EvoFire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,670
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader Score: 1 reviews
View EvoFire's Photo Gallery
The rear sways would definitely fit. The front should too cause the suspension is the same. I dunno about you, but I had a 21mm Whiteline rear sway, it was WAY better than stock.
__________________
EvoFire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2007, 03:02 PM   #3 (permalink)
College owns my wallet...
 
Venom_5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ca$hville, TN
Posts: 6,603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
iTrader Score: 4 reviews
View Venom_5's Photo Gallery
upgrading from 15-17mm wont give you enough difference to go through all the hassle of labor for ... you would want to get something upwards of 19mm, IMO

also, you would want to downgrade your FSB for better handling (more body roll, but less understeer - a good trade-off, if you ask me)
__________________

R.I.P. '95 Camry LE | Welcome "Blurple" '96 240SX SE
Buy My Weapon-R Intake [Here]
http://sck388.mybrute.com
Venom_5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2007, 04:22 PM   #4 (permalink)
How hard could it be?
 
uibalnme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Inglewood, CA
Posts: 1,638
Gameroom cash: $445645
Thanks: 0
Thanked 74 Times in 69 Posts
iTrader Score: 4 reviews
View uibalnme's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by EvoFire View Post
The rear sways would definitely fit. The front should too cause the suspension is the same. I dunno about you, but I had a 21mm Whiteline rear sway, it was WAY better than stock.
21mm? What's the part number of that one? The only Whiteline RSB I've found for my 96 is the 18mm BTR36.

Last edited by uibalnme; 11-18-2007 at 12:23 AM.
uibalnme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2007, 04:49 PM   #5 (permalink)
'95 Camry 5S-FE
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 751
Gameroom cash: $267767
Thanks: 2
Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View 95PimpingCamry's Photo Gallery
^ Yea, the Whitetline RSB for the gen 3/3.5 is 18mm.
__________________
All of the lag, none of the boost.
VTEC It's like waiting for really bad sex.
95PimpingCamry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2007, 05:10 PM   #6 (permalink)
One with the force
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,820
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View 94CoupeV6's Photo Gallery
Is the TRD RSB 24mm?
94CoupeV6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2007, 07:10 PM   #7 (permalink)
I HAS BOOST!!!
 
bigbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Elkridge, Maryland
Posts: 10,711
Gameroom cash: $549987
Thanks: 10
Thanked 104 Times in 102 Posts
iTrader Score: 28 reviews
View bigbird's Photo Gallery
TRD is actually smaller then the whiteline but the dual settings allow it to be stiffer then the whiteline.
__________________

R.I.P.

04 Accord EX-L V6 6m
Car Domain:
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3245042
bigbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2010, 03:47 PM   #8 (permalink)
New TN User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View Shawn_D's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by Venom_5 View Post
upgrading from 15-17mm wont give you enough difference to go through all the hassle of labor for ... you would want to get something upwards of 19mm, IMO
This is only my 2nd post here and yet I'm already committing the faux pas of digging up a 3-year-old post from the grave! However, as an engineer, I feel compelled to comment about the relative stiffness of the 15mm vs. 17mm bars.

A 2mm difference doesn't sound like much, but if two sway bars are otherwise the same (shape, material, solid vs. hollow) as the two OE bars should be, the torsional stiffness is proportional to the fourth power of the radius. So, here's what you get:
  • 15mm: 15/2 = 7.5; 7.5^4 = 3164
  • 17mm: 17/2 = 8.5; 8.5^4 = 5220
  • 5220/3164 = 1.65
Thus, the 17mm bar is 65% stiffer than the 15mm bar. Doing the math again, the Whiteline 18mm bar is 107% stiffer than a 15mm, and 25% stiffer than a 17mm. So, you can see that even a meager 2 or 3mm increase in diameter can provide a significant change in stiffness.

-Shawn
Shawn_D is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Shawn_D For This Useful Post:
Chris Crash (12-16-2010), fenixus (12-16-2010), Life2 (04-30-2011)
Old 12-16-2010, 09:44 PM   #9 (permalink)
抵抗は無駄です
 
fenixus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: northern NJ, USA
Posts: 7,981
Gameroom cash: $1139930
Thanks: 546
Thanked 506 Times in 458 Posts
Supreme Member
iTrader Score: 4 reviews
View fenixus's Photo Gallery
Shawn_D, your post was worth a thread resurrection

thanks for the math, it's interesting how a little more here and there impacts the whole car's stiffeness in handling
__________________

'02 Solara SLE V6 1MZ-FE/A541E Coupe .: Denso/NGK : Akebono SP : Philips 9011 HIR (low+high) : Toshiba HIR2 9012 (fogs) : Magnefine :. @ 131k
'00 Solara SE 5S-FE/A140E Coupe .: NGK : Hawk HPS : Philips XP : RCEng : Magnefine :. @ 82k

4SALE: connectors for Camry Headlight Wiring Harness and ECU
fenixus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2010, 07:50 AM   #10 (permalink)
New TN User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View Shawn_D's Photo Gallery
You're welcome, fenixus. Just trying to provide a bit of info in exchange for all that I've learned from lurking on the board!
Shawn_D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2010, 10:52 AM   #11 (permalink)
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NKY
Posts: 308
Thanks: 37
Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View curry.style's Photo Gallery
Is there anything any stiffer about wagon rear bars? I know the springs are heavier. Just wondering if finding and installing a set of Whiteline bars would be worth doing on the wagon?
curry.style is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2010, 01:16 AM   #12 (permalink)
1MZ powered MR2
 
Jason.MZW20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Victorville, CA
Posts: 829
Gameroom cash: $226450
Thanks: 8
Thanked 99 Times in 86 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View Jason.MZW20's Photo Gallery
Sway bars should be the last thing you change. For the most part, anti-sway bars do provide reduced body roll, but they have the unfortunate habit of reducing suspension independence as you increase the torsional stiffness.

The best way to reduce body roll is to use a stiffly sprung linear spring, then use a much smaller sway bar or none at all. They are good at keeping the wheels from leaving the pavement during hard cornering, but I have a hard time believing the Camry will put a wheel up with its cushy suspension.

I suppose most people go for sway bars because they're the easier to change, but just remember that the higher stiffness you use, the less grip you have available. This is because the torsional stiffness acts as a catalyst and pushes the tires closer to their limits. That's why if you increase the rear bar stiffness, you lose rear grip faster, and gain oversteer as the fronts will have more traction.
__________________
1991 Toyota MR2 V6
Ported, rebuilt 3.0L 1MZ
Fully OBDII compliant and California smog legal

Last edited by Jason.MZW20; 12-19-2010 at 01:18 AM.
Jason.MZW20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2010, 06:43 AM   #13 (permalink)
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Maine
Posts: 550
Gameroom cash: $192100
Thanks: 7
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View SexieWASD's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason.MZW20 View Post
That's why if you increase the rear bar stiffness, you lose rear grip faster, and gain oversteer as the fronts will have more traction.
That's not entirely true, at least it wasn't for me. Where I am half of the year you are driving on a loose surface, and have very little traction anyways. In the winter it's snow, then comes spring and it's dirt left over from snow removal.

On a loose surface I found that the body roll had enough momentum in the rear to kick the wheels out under an aggressive turn, The TRD rear swaybar prevented the rear from gaining enough force in turn to do that, as easily.

Last edited by SexieWASD; 12-19-2010 at 06:45 AM.
SexieWASD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2010, 09:28 AM   #14 (permalink)
New TN User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View Shawn_D's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason.MZW20 View Post
Sway bars should be the last thing you change. For the most part, anti-sway bars do provide reduced body roll, but they have the unfortunate habit of reducing suspension independence as you increase the torsional stiffness.

The best way to reduce body roll is to use a stiffly sprung linear spring, then use a much smaller sway bar or none at all. They are good at keeping the wheels from leaving the pavement during hard cornering, but I have a hard time believing the Camry will put a wheel up with its cushy suspension.
That's a good philosophy, but when you're talking about a relatively limited set of suspension options for something like a Gen 3 Camry, it's kind of academic whether you change to another OE rear bar or even an aftermarket one before going with springs. Individually-selected coil-over springs aside, I'd bet that like other cars, most every aftermarket spring set for a Camry increases the front and rear spring stiffness the same proportion and thus provides the same balance as OE (i.e. understeer); any readily-available rear bar probably isn't going to turn the car into a twitchy tail-happy ride.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason.MZW20 View Post
I suppose most people go for sway bars because they're the easier to change, but just remember that the higher stiffness you use, the less grip you have available. This is because the torsional stiffness acts as a catalyst and pushes the tires closer to their limits. That's why if you increase the rear bar stiffness, you lose rear grip faster, and gain oversteer as the fronts will have more traction.
It's no different if you increase rear roll stiffness via springs, though. This is why I went with Dinan springs on my 535i; they're only 3/4" lower than stock and while they're not as stiff as something like H&R or Spax, the increase in stiffness was relatively greater for the rear springs, changing the balance in the manner I wanted -- less understeer (more oversteer).
Shawn_D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2010, 12:15 PM   #15 (permalink)
1MZ powered MR2
 
Jason.MZW20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Victorville, CA
Posts: 829
Gameroom cash: $226450
Thanks: 8
Thanked 99 Times in 86 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View Jason.MZW20's Photo Gallery
Shawn, you're right, of course. Most spring manufacturers don't really change much, but the Camry could use a stiffer rear spring anyway. I regularly see Camrys nearly bottomed out with 3 people in the rear and maybe some stuff in the trunk. I think Toyota made it a bit TOO soft. Couple that with the weight change on acceleration, and it looks ridiculous.

I've been playing with my sway bar endlinks on my MR2 because I had this nagging issue: front end washout and extreme tracking. The endlinks weren't adjusted to the new ride height (approx. 1.6 inches lower), so because the endlinks were closer to the bar and strut housing, there was even more tension. I had to lengthen the endlinks to make them parallel with the strut and increase the leverage. Now, the front tires don't washout resulting in improved balance and the car doesn't track as heavily. Steering effort has also been reduced, so I can flick the wheel again. Having to fight with the car is never fun.
__________________
1991 Toyota MR2 V6
Ported, rebuilt 3.0L 1MZ
Fully OBDII compliant and California smog legal
Jason.MZW20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums > Toyota Passenger and Sports Car Forums > Camry and Solara Forum > 3rd & 4th Generation (1992–1996 & 1997–2001)

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1st issue with 07'Camry AESANTIAGO 5th & 6th Generation (2002-2006 & 2007-2011) 949 01-08-2008 02:49 PM
so i crunched some numbers, true carlo$ 5th & 6th Generation (2002-2006 & 2007-2011) 36 10-28-2007 06:12 AM
Whiteline MA70 Front/Rear Adjustable Swaybar GroupBuy!! raptorracing Supporting Vendor Sales 30 04-27-2007 03:27 AM
TRD Muffler for I4 or V6 Only???? number73forlife Camry & Solara Lounge 22 02-28-2006 09:58 AM
I4 Eibach springs fit V6? Option_Fans Camry & Solara Lounge 20 04-09-2004 09:38 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
ToyotaNation.com is an independent Toyota/Lexus enthusiast website. ToyotaNation.com is not sponsored by or in any way affiliated with Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. The Toyota, Lexus and Scion names and logos are trademarks owned by Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.