Quote:
Originally Posted by pearldrumbum
ok, so I've deduced that the 95 engine I put in is a california engine because it had 2 O2's on the exhaust manifold (I swapped the exhaust manifolds though because the bottom flange didn't line up with the down pipe).
I'm guessing this has something to do with my problems... I've checked and rechecked all of my wiring connections and vacuum hoses to make sure I haven't absentmindedly left something important unplugged, so it has to be that one or more of the important sensors are wired differently (maybe something in the distributor? this may explain why the tach wasn't working when it did decide to start)
So anyways, with this new revalation... does that make it easier to pinpoint the problem?
|
Um, '95 non-Cali had an O2 on the E manifold, then a cat immediate below the manifold, then another O2 immediately below the cat. Wrong O2 sensors might make it run like crap, but it shouldn't keep it from running at all. You could always just unplug the O2 sensors for now, and let it use the default fuel map, which should be fine for getting it working.
Tach not working sort of sounds like a crank or camshaft sensor issue...not sure which the 92 ECU used monitoring rpm. Having cam and crank timing getting to the ECU is pretty critical to getting anything at all running.