Short Ram Intake versus Stock Intake - Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums


» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums > Toyota Passenger and Sports Car Forums > Camry and Solara Forum > 3rd & 4th Generation (1992–1996 & 1997–2001)

3rd & 4th Generation (1992–1996 & 1997–2001) Toyota Camry Discussion for years: 1992-1996 & 1997-2001 Topics of discussion range from fuel economy, safety, modifications, performance all involving America's favorite family car, the Toyota Camry.

ToyotaNation.com is the premier Toyota Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-09-2010, 03:56 PM   #1 (permalink)
One with the force
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pluto
Posts: 4,386
Gameroom cash: $811887
Thanks: 126
Thanked 282 Times in 240 Posts
iTrader Score: 10 reviews
View Chris Crash's Photo Gallery
Short Ram Intake versus Stock Intake

So I decided to experiment with my car since my USB scan tool showed up yesterday. (I guess you could say I'm an automosexual... )

Anyway. Since my second engine swap I had an Injen SRI installed. I always was trying to blockade the filter from the hot air, and I successfully dropped the temperature a couple of degrees but nothing drastic. So today I figured I would do a little research.

With the car at normal operating temperature I hooked up the scan tool and read the temperatures. With the SRI installed I got this :


This seemed a little high to me. I then removed the SRI and re-installed the stock intake, being careful to make sure the filter box connected to the black tube that runs through the fender. I then hooked the car back to my laptop and let it run and get to the same operating temperature and then I got this :


There's a 20 degree difference! I'm hoping this will help with my MPG as well. I'll miss the sound of the intake, but I don't like the fact that I put $10 in last night and after driving to school and back today I am on empty again.

So in short, SRI is pointless. Don't bother, it kills your mileage. The stock airbox breathes well enough, so just leave it UNLESS you're making a custom CAI then you might get even lower temperatures, maybe I'll try that experiment another day!

Hope I save someone some money.


KEYWORDS: SRI Short ram intake intakekit hp performance intake better CAI

Last edited by 2wickedtoyz; 06-10-2010 at 11:54 AM. Reason: adding keywords to make it easier to find
Chris Crash is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Chris Crash For This Useful Post:
2wickedtoyz (06-09-2010), fenixus (06-09-2010), Kiwi-Corolla (06-10-2010), peshwa (06-09-2010)
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 06-09-2010, 04:15 PM   #2 (permalink)
Mad Scientist
 
2wickedtoyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,712
Gameroom cash: $248601
Thanks: 25
Thanked 47 Times in 35 Posts
Supreme Member
iTrader Score: 9 reviews
View 2wickedtoyz's Photo Gallery
very good read

i think i'll be doing this on my intake setup also.
__________________
[url]http://www.cardomain.com/id/wickedtoyz[url]
Camry Wagon Crew
2wickedtoyz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 04:30 PM   #3 (permalink)
TN's Mad Chemist
 
projektvertx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Westland, MI - School, Montreal QC - Home
Posts: 2,933
Gameroom cash: $568901
Thanks: 198
Thanked 111 Times in 97 Posts
Lifetime Supreme Member
iTrader Score: 20 reviews
View projektvertx's Photo Gallery
Cool! That's good to know, and at least it's good to know Toyota's design isn't half bad! Did you let the engine run for a couple of minutes after re-installing the stock intake?
__________________
1995 Toyota Camry V6 LE-6M1 250K Miles, Fun Car
1997 Acura RL-Gone
2007 Acura RL SH-AWD, Technology Package, Opulent Blue Pearl- Fun Car/Daily Driver
projektvertx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 04:40 PM   #4 (permalink)
One with the force
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pluto
Posts: 4,386
Gameroom cash: $811887
Thanks: 126
Thanked 282 Times in 240 Posts
iTrader Score: 10 reviews
View Chris Crash's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by projektvertx View Post
Cool! That's good to know, and at least it's good to know Toyota's design isn't half bad! Did you let the engine run for a couple of minutes after re-installing the stock intake?
I should have looked at the MAF sensor's numbers to see if there was a difference in air flow... oh well. Maybe another day.

But yes I let the engine run probably 5-7 minutes with the stock intake. It had cooled off a little and I had to get back up to the same coolant temperature (for control consistency's sake).

I'm hoping to see a difference in mileage is the main concern. If I keep getting crappy mileage then I've got more work to do! It might also be my knock sensor problem putting the ECU in fail safe mode...
Chris Crash is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 04:44 PM   #5 (permalink)
One with the force
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pluto
Posts: 4,386
Gameroom cash: $811887
Thanks: 126
Thanked 282 Times in 240 Posts
iTrader Score: 10 reviews
View Chris Crash's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2wickedtoyz View Post
very good read

i think i'll be doing this on my intake setup also.
Yeah. I figured it looks and sounds cool and all, but it's not gaining anything and it might have even been hurting performance due to such high temperatures, as we all know that cooler air is better.

I also think that the SRI being metal makes it heat up a lot too, because I can barely even touch it when I took it off the hot car. But the stock one being rubber/plastic Probably helps. I wonder if you could wrap the rubber tubing in some kind of heat wrap to lower the temperature. I was also considering wrapping my headers because those heat shields don't do a damn thing.

I just can't find the wrap anywhere!
Chris Crash is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 04:55 PM   #6 (permalink)
I HAS BOOST!!!
 
bigbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Elkridge, Maryland
Posts: 10,711
Gameroom cash: $549987
Thanks: 10
Thanked 104 Times in 102 Posts
iTrader Score: 28 reviews
View bigbird's Photo Gallery
not that this isnt good info...but it should be common sense. An SRI is not intended to take in cooler air then the stock intake, thats what a CAI is for(which the stock one sort of is). its there to take in more with less restriction. whether or not it does that would be a better test to perform.

most of us will tell you that it has NO real performance benifits anyways unless your running boost and need the lower restriction and larger diameter filter. thoes who install an SRI for mileage are almost always wrong about it's benefits unless the set it up right (see ASG14's setup). the facotry tests several setups and find a system that takes in the coolest air with the least amount of restriction, effect on the performance and cost goals of the car.
__________________

R.I.P.

04 Accord EX-L V6 6m
Car Domain:
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3245042
bigbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 04:59 PM   #7 (permalink)
Official TN Member
 
THEARCHITEK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: new haven
Posts: 239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View THEARCHITEK's Photo Gallery
yeah i deff think the cai will help in not much in mileage but in performance i think thos SRI sucks anyways
THEARCHITEK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 05:12 PM   #8 (permalink)
One with the force
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pluto
Posts: 4,386
Gameroom cash: $811887
Thanks: 126
Thanked 282 Times in 240 Posts
iTrader Score: 10 reviews
View Chris Crash's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbird View Post
not that this isnt good info...but it should be common sense. An SRI is not intended to take in cooler air then the stock intake, thats what a CAI is for(which the stock one sort of is). its there to take in more with less restriction. whether or not it does that would be a better test to perform.

most of us will tell you that it has NO real performance benifits anyways unless your running boost and need the lower restriction and larger diameter filter. thoes who install an SRI for mileage are almost always wrong about it's benefits unless the set it up right (see ASG14's setup). the facotry tests several setups and find a system that takes in the coolest air with the least amount of restriction, effect on the performance and cost goals of the car.
My next test was gonna be a MAF test. But I really just wanted to post up numbers so people could see why SRI sucks. That's all.
Chris Crash is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 06:04 PM   #9 (permalink)
RU2CHKN?
 
RU2CHKN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 601
Gameroom cash: $191865
Thanks: 6
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
iTrader Score: 5 reviews
View RU2CHKN's Photo Gallery
Holy crap that bad huh? Good to know some great info
RU2CHKN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 09:15 PM   #10 (permalink)
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 150
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View P3VZ's Photo Gallery
wow i was just gonna buy a SRI too. good thing i ran into this thread. So basically SRI is useless unless your going for sound and better throttle response but in the flip side your MPG will be killed. But for ppl on boost who need low restriction will benefit from it....
__________________
92 Toyota Camry V6 LE
P3VZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 09:16 PM   #11 (permalink)
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 228
Gameroom cash: $115300
Thanks: 78
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View TCam01's Photo Gallery
yea dude keep us posted im curious to see what a cai temperatures at and whether or not it helps mpg versus stock. also the airflow would be a pretty cool thing to figure out as well...interesting stuff
__________________
Yota Camry 2001 5S-FE 105,430 Miles+
TCam01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 10:01 PM   #12 (permalink)
Lighting Specialist!
 
iovaykind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,885
Gameroom cash: $480582
Thanks: 4
Thanked 45 Times in 43 Posts
Garage
iTrader Score: 8 reviews
View iovaykind's Photo Gallery
Not to threadjack but I can't seem to get MAF readings from my Scangauge II.. I have a 96 camry, anyone else with this problem?

Earlier back I was going to switch to a SRI but my dad warned me saying I'd be getting hotter air which is not as good for the engine. I think the performance gains are negligible while the downsides are just numerous..
iovaykind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 10:11 PM   #13 (permalink)
抵抗は無駄です
 
fenixus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: northern NJ, USA
Posts: 7,981
Gameroom cash: $1139930
Thanks: 546
Thanked 506 Times in 458 Posts
Supreme Member
iTrader Score: 4 reviews
View fenixus's Photo Gallery
well, yeah go figure, SRI pulls air from the engine bay (because it's short) while stock air intake pulls air from behind the driver head light - that is if the seal holds on air cleaner box by fender (mine doesn't)

i think only a true CAI with long pipe running across the engine bay (behind grille) can make this number go down significantly below stock intake.
with my stock setup (bad seal before filter) on hot days (air ~90F) and after idling with close hood i'm getting close to 125F anyways ...

so you are saying that kills the MPG ? interesting, never thought of that ... will try fixing that seal with some silicone/RTV (have huge amount of left over from valve cover job) and see if it improves my IAT significantly and if it impact my poor MPG (22 MPG @ 70% highway for 5S-FE sucks, doesn't it?)

glad to see you've got your obd2-usb cable from Hong Kong so fast mine took longer
__________________

'02 Solara SLE V6 1MZ-FE/A541E Coupe .: Denso/NGK : Akebono SP : Philips 9011 HIR (low+high) : Toshiba HIR2 9012 (fogs) : Magnefine :. @ 131k
'00 Solara SE 5S-FE/A140E Coupe .: NGK : Hawk HPS : Philips XP : RCEng : Magnefine :. @ 82k

4SALE: connectors for Camry Headlight Wiring Harness and ECU

Last edited by fenixus; 06-09-2010 at 10:23 PM.
fenixus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 10:18 PM   #14 (permalink)
One with the force
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pluto
Posts: 4,386
Gameroom cash: $811887
Thanks: 126
Thanked 282 Times in 240 Posts
iTrader Score: 10 reviews
View Chris Crash's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by P3VZ View Post
wow i was just gonna buy a SRI too. good thing i ran into this thread. So basically SRI is useless unless your going for sound and better throttle response but in the flip side your MPG will be killed. But for ppl on boost who need low restriction will benefit from it....
SRI will give you a noticeable sound, and it's pretty sweet once you get to like 4k. Also a bit better throttle response, but MPG sucks and you are just sucking in hot, hot, hot air.

I think boosted people would run best with a CAI but I don't know if that's still too restrictive.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TCam01 View Post
yea dude keep us posted im curious to see what a cai temperatures at and whether or not it helps mpg versus stock. also the airflow would be a pretty cool thing to figure out as well...interesting stuff
I'll definitely get the MAF numbers tomorrow some time, I don't know when or if I'll ever get around to making a custom CAI. But if I do, I'll test it the same way!

Quote:
Originally Posted by iovaykind View Post
Not to threadjack but I can't seem to get MAF readings from my Scangauge II.. I have a 96 camry, anyone else with this problem?

Earlier back I was going to switch to a SRI but my dad warned me saying I'd be getting hotter air which is not as good for the engine. I think the performance gains are negligible while the downsides are just numerous..
Is it one of those handheld scanners they use at like Advance and stuff? I couldn't figure out how to get any data from those other than codes. That's the main reason I bought the USB scanner. It was like $15 on eBay and plugs into your laptop and you use your software of choice.

Unless you're boosted, there's really no performance gain. At all. And you're just wasting money because a new Injen is, what, $150? And then all the money you lose in gas being wasted.
I'd rather just spend $20 making a PVC CAI!
Chris Crash is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 10:24 PM   #15 (permalink)
One with the force
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pluto
Posts: 4,386
Gameroom cash: $811887
Thanks: 126
Thanked 282 Times in 240 Posts
iTrader Score: 10 reviews
View Chris Crash's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by fenixus View Post
well, yeah go figure, SRI pulls air from the engine bay (because it's short) while stock air intake pulls air from behind the driver head light - that is if the seal holds on air cleaner box by fender (mine doesn't)

i think only a true CAI with long pipe running across the engine bay (behind grille) can make this number go down significantly below stock intake.
with my stock setup (bad seal before filter) on hot days (air ~90F) and after idling with close hood i'm getting close to 125F anyways ...

so you are saying that kills the MPG ? interesting, never thought of that ...

glad to see you've got your obd2-usb cable from Hong Kong so fast mine took longer
Yeah. I knew it was pulling in hot air, I just wanted to see how much of a difference it was.

You're definitely right about the CAI bringing down the temps, but I don't know if it really needs to go behind the grill. That would make so many complicated bends that it would become real restrictive. Even though it would be getting nice cold air!

I had the scanner hooked up while the SRI was still on. It originally read ~135 degrees or so after driving home from school. After I opened the hood that number dropped to about ~108.

...I wonder what a hood scoop would do for the engine bay... I was also planning on wrapping the headers to try to lose a little more heat under there. It's ridiculous how hot it gets. My old camry I had removed the rubber weather stripping across the top and my current camry I still have it on. I can say that it really does make a difference. BUT it gets annoying to see the heat coming out of the gap when you're at a stop light because it's all wavy and makes you feel like you're on acid.

I was very surprised at how quickly the scanner arrived. I ordered it like Mid last week and it arrived on Monday.
Chris Crash is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums > Toyota Passenger and Sports Car Forums > Camry and Solara Forum > 3rd & 4th Generation (1992–1996 & 1997–2001)

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:04 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
ToyotaNation.com is an independent Toyota/Lexus enthusiast website. ToyotaNation.com is not sponsored by or in any way affiliated with Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. The Toyota, Lexus and Scion names and logos are trademarks owned by Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.