Scan Guage II - Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums


» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums > Toyota Passenger and Sports Car Forums > Camry and Solara Forum > 3rd & 4th Generation (1992–1996 & 1997–2001)

3rd & 4th Generation (1992–1996 & 1997–2001) Toyota Camry Discussion for years: 1992-1996 & 1997-2001 Topics of discussion range from fuel economy, safety, modifications, performance all involving America's favorite family car, the Toyota Camry.

ToyotaNation.com is the premier Toyota Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-16-2011, 03:42 AM   #1 (permalink)
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 200
Thanks: 124
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View LostSouthernStar's Photo Gallery
4th Generation Scan Guage II

Hi all,


I think I'm going to invest in a Scan Guage II. My fuel economy average is pretty good, but I'm going to raise it even higher. Just a little game against myself...plus saving money along the way ;-) money is no object as it will surely pay for itself in no time.




Happy driving and God bless!
__________________


2001 Toyota Camry 2.2L-I4, automatic transmission with 157,000 miles.
LostSouthernStar is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 08-16-2011, 05:28 AM   #2 (permalink)
New TN User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: los angeles
Posts: 30
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View Brand's Photo Gallery
UltraGauge is cheaper and basically has the same features
Brand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2011, 01:47 PM   #3 (permalink)
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 67
Thanks: 48
Thanked 22 Times in 19 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View Brit101's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brand View Post
UltraGauge is cheaper and basically has the same features
I agree, and feel that the fit and finish is better with the Ultra Gauge, it will match up well with my TomTom XL, almost twins!
Brit101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2011, 10:39 PM   #4 (permalink)
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 63
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View kmr16442's Photo Gallery
Ditto on the Ultraguage, I bought one and it works quite well.
kmr16442 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2011, 11:42 PM   #5 (permalink)
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 200
Thanks: 124
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View LostSouthernStar's Photo Gallery
I've heard from friends and others that the Ultra Guage is built poorly and that the hanging attachment breaks easily.


I'd rather pay for QUALITY then quantity, or in this case, cheap pricing.



Also, I read that the Ultra Guage is inaccurate in reading data, particulary fuel economy, which is my number one objective.




Thanks again!
__________________


2001 Toyota Camry 2.2L-I4, automatic transmission with 157,000 miles.
LostSouthernStar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2011, 10:22 AM   #6 (permalink)
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 67
Thanks: 48
Thanked 22 Times in 19 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View Brit101's Photo Gallery
LSS I believe you are making a mistake on not giving the UltraGuage a try.
It comes with a 30 day money back guarantee.
Reading the UG forum there appears to be many happy customers of UG.

ScanGuage II appears to have been designed in the late seventies early eighties. The data output technology is poor, and that is putting it mildly.
Reading the SGII during operation of your vehicle appears hazardous.

Please have a look at this thread from the UG forum, and see the pic of UG mounted in the customer's car. The gauge output is far superior than SGII's output.

http://www.ultra-gauge.com/UltraGaug...hp?topic=505.0

Just my two cents, hope you will be happy with the SGII, but I doubt it.

Buy the way if the mount breaks you may order another one for $12.
Why not post your concerns on the UG forum and get feedback from owners of the UG?
Brit101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2011, 11:00 AM   #7 (permalink)
Official TN Member
 
Pvt-Public's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 343
Gameroom cash: $274350
Thanks: 7
Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View Pvt-Public's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Also, I read that the Ultra Guage is inaccurate in reading data, particulary fuel economy, which is my number one objective.
No add-on gauge will give accurate fuel economy. The ONLY way to get even close to accurate MPG figures is to divide miles driven by gallons of fuel used. And even then unless you absolutely know that you filled your tank to the same level every time is a guess at best.
Pvt-Public is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2011, 05:15 PM   #8 (permalink)
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 200
Thanks: 124
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View LostSouthernStar's Photo Gallery
*sigh* so I am back to square one yet again :-\ why can't anything be made to do what it is made for?
__________________


2001 Toyota Camry 2.2L-I4, automatic transmission with 157,000 miles.
LostSouthernStar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2011, 09:29 PM   #9 (permalink)
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: States
Posts: 118
Thanks: 33
Thanked 17 Times in 16 Posts
iTrader Score: 2 reviews
View slavie's Photo Gallery
Both the UG or the SGII take the input data from the car's sensors and guesstimates fuel economy based on them. One problem you have right away is that your car's speedo is not a scientific measurement instrument (nor is it required to be - the law allows is to overstate the speed within a certain percentage). Your "reported" speed also changes based on your tire thread wear, as speed calculation takes into account the diameter of the tire and so on and so forth.

Long story short: it cannot possibly be dead accurate. What my speedometer is saying rarely line's up with what my GPS is saying - usually the speed is off by up to 2 mph. And I'm not even talking about the errors car's other sensors could produce.

In other words, if you want a completely accurate mpg reading, you have to measure the EXACT amount of fuel you pour into the tank, and measure the distance traveled with some sort of super-accurate GPS tracking device. Otherwise you're just chasing a Unicorn.

Either one of those gauges are only good for approximating what kind of driving yields you better fuel economy.

I went with UltraGauge because it has bigger, easier to read display that fits more gauges at once. I'm glad to report I'm totally happy with it, especially considering that it cost half as much as SGII.

Hope this helps!

Last edited by slavie; 08-17-2011 at 09:31 PM.
slavie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2011, 10:05 PM   #10 (permalink)
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 200
Thanks: 124
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View LostSouthernStar's Photo Gallery
I understand all of that, but what I do not like about the Ultra Guage is that you can only mount it to a window and you cannot disconnect it without data loss...also, some scum bag will see it and think it is a GPS and break in my car to steal it...that's something I do not want.

The Scan Guage can at least be removed and hidden from view and it can be mounted just about anywhere.


Those are my concerns.







Quote:
Originally Posted by slavie View Post
Both the UG or the SGII take the input data from the car's sensors and guesstimates fuel economy based on them. One problem you have right away is that your car's speedo is not a scientific measurement instrument (nor is it required to be - the law allows is to overstate the speed within a certain percentage). Your "reported" speed also changes based on your tire thread wear, as speed calculation takes into account the diameter of the tire and so on and so forth.

Long story short: it cannot possibly be dead accurate. What my speedometer is saying rarely line's up with what my GPS is saying - usually the speed is off by up to 2 mph. And I'm not even talking about the errors car's other sensors could produce.

In other words, if you want a completely accurate mpg reading, you have to measure the EXACT amount of fuel you pour into the tank, and measure the distance traveled with some sort of super-accurate GPS tracking device. Otherwise you're just chasing a Unicorn.

Either one of those gauges are only good for approximating what kind of driving yields you better fuel economy.

I went with UltraGauge because it has bigger, easier to read display that fits more gauges at once. I'm glad to report I'm totally happy with it, especially considering that it cost half as much as SGII.

Hope this helps!
__________________


2001 Toyota Camry 2.2L-I4, automatic transmission with 157,000 miles.
LostSouthernStar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2011, 10:09 PM   #11 (permalink)
One with the force
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pluto
Posts: 4,386
Gameroom cash: $811887
Thanks: 126
Thanked 282 Times in 240 Posts
iTrader Score: 10 reviews
View Chris Crash's Photo Gallery
You could always put the UG in the glovebox, it's not like you need to be watching a movie on it while you're driving. Once you use it a few times, you'll never need it constantly in your sight.
Chris Crash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2011, 10:15 PM   #12 (permalink)
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 200
Thanks: 124
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View LostSouthernStar's Photo Gallery
I'd rather not...I want something where I can always keep track of what is going with my vehicle just as what is shown in the dash instrument cluster.




Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Crash View Post
You could always put the UG in the glovebox, it's not like you need to be watching a movie on it while you're driving. Once you use it a few times, you'll never need it constantly in your sight.
__________________


2001 Toyota Camry 2.2L-I4, automatic transmission with 157,000 miles.
LostSouthernStar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2011, 07:04 PM   #13 (permalink)
T100 Road Warrior...
 
BamZipPow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 6,118
Gameroom cash: $863310
Thanks: 530
Thanked 1,107 Times in 924 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View BamZipPow's Photo Gallery
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by LostSouthernStar View Post
I understand all of that, but what I do not like about the Ultra Guage is that you can only mount it to a window and you cannot disconnect it without data loss...also, some scum bag will see it and think it is a GPS and break in my car to steal it...that's something I do not want.

The Scan Guage can at least be removed and hidden from view and it can be mounted just about anywhere.


Those are my concerns.
You don't have to use the mount they send with the unit. You can make yer own simple mount that works like a quick release. Here's my setup...
http://www.ultra-gauge.com/UltraGaug...hp?topic=495.0

You can also mod the UG to accept an network cable setup like the ScangaugeII does. It will take some skill to map the pin out of their cable, unsolder their cable, and solder in the network jack. Or you can wait until UG comes out with a removable cable...when ever (if ever) that will be.

Seems the SGII cable runs about $20 plus shipping...
http://www.scangauge.com/buy/buy-direct/
__________________
1998 T-100 SR5 2WD auto, Roadmaster Active Suspension, 6½" dropped front air dam, 4½" drop full belly pan, 4° rear diffuser, 11" side skirts, oil catch jar, AC mod, aero cap, 67% grill block = 26mpg highway!

Quote:
Originally Posted by n c t t o r a
You have used a censored word. Please remove this word.
BamZipPow is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BamZipPow For This Useful Post:
LostSouthernStar (08-18-2011)
Old 08-18-2011, 11:14 PM   #14 (permalink)
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 200
Thanks: 124
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View LostSouthernStar's Photo Gallery
I think I am going to get the Ultra Guage.




Has anyone experienced any problems or defects with UltraGuage? How many sensors are reported on the 97-01 Toyota Camrys???...





Thanks!
__________________


2001 Toyota Camry 2.2L-I4, automatic transmission with 157,000 miles.
LostSouthernStar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2011, 11:51 PM   #15 (permalink)
Official TN Member
 
vincentfox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 74
Thanks: 2
Thanked 14 Times in 6 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View vincentfox's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by BamZipPow View Post
Just wanted to point out you linked into another forum requiring a login. Not very accessible. Could you just post a pic in this thread?
__________________
1997 Camry LE 2.2L - 222,000+ miles and running like a top!
vincentfox is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums > Toyota Passenger and Sports Car Forums > Camry and Solara Forum > 3rd & 4th Generation (1992–1996 & 1997–2001)

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:56 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
ToyotaNation.com is an independent Toyota/Lexus enthusiast website. ToyotaNation.com is not sponsored by or in any way affiliated with Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. The Toyota, Lexus and Scion names and logos are trademarks owned by Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.