2.2 supercharger? - Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums

3rd & 4th Generation (1992–1996 & 1997–2001) Toyota Camry Discussion for years: 1992-1996 & 1997-2001 Topics of discussion range from fuel economy, safety, modifications, performance all involving America's favorite family car, the Toyota Camry.

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 8 Old 11-22-2012, 04:08 PM Thread Starter
Stilkiboy
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Ask, Hřnefoss, Norway
Posts: 220
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
(Thread Starter)
2.2 supercharger?

Anyone tried this? Or anything like it?


-98 Camry 2.2 5S-FE
-96 Carina E 1.8 7A-FE
-96 Carina E 1.6 4A-FE
-85 Suzuki SJ 413 G13A (FK-Balja)
-86 Suzuki SJ 413 G13A
-84 Suzuki SJ 410 F10A
Dotsetsveen is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 8 Old 11-22-2012, 08:44 PM
Senior TN Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,505
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 325 Times in 293 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
No, I haven't.

A word of warning.
To increase performance on any vehicle you can do two things, reduce the weight or increase the amount of fuel it can burn.
Reducing the weight is pretty straight forward, lol, remove all the stuff in the car you don't need.

Increasing the amount of fuel it can burn is not so straight forward.
Thats why there are 4cyl, 6cyl, 8cyl, and even 12cyl engines, the more fuel you can burn the faster you can go.

Pushing more fuel into a 4cyl engine, the point of a supercharger or an NOX system, can have bad side effects.
Pistons, rods and crankshafts are made for the factory horsepower of the engine.
If you increase the fuel you increase the pressure on these parts, and that can be a very bad side effect.

If you are building a 4cyl engine then you can beef up the bottom end for the extra pressure, if you are just bolting stuff on to a stock engine, then be aware of the downside.
Blown head gasket is probably the least expensive downside.

Last edited by RonR; 11-22-2012 at 09:14 PM.
RonR is offline  
post #3 of 8 Old 11-22-2012, 09:59 PM
Almost 1/2 Million Miles!
 
guapoman2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 967
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 94 Times in 85 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Wow! Seriously people!!

Space Shuttle Main Engine's turbopumps spinned at over 30,000 rpm and there was a time when NASA had to figure out some new bearings and they did (Mid 1990's) otherwise the Space Shuttle would have been grounded much sooner than this year!

I wonder what kind of bearings this Super Charger unit has or is it Fluid bearing? I have yet to see an impeller that can withstand this kind of RPMs and made of what?

I fly Electric Ducted Fan unit RC Jets and would love to get my hands on an Impeller with this kind of serious performance specifications.

Should these claims be true, I would not be anywhere near that Super Charge "Impeller" unit, just in case a hair-line crack develops and one of those blades and results to depart from the impeller housing and through all kinds of material!!

Be safe people!!

RonR is correct, you will destroy a tired Engine if you do not perhaps completely rebuilt it for this kind of duty / performance service.

Last edited by guapoman2000; 11-22-2012 at 10:00 PM.
guapoman2000 is offline  
post #4 of 8 Old 11-23-2012, 12:08 AM
import mech
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
^^ uhh, its extremely common for superchargers and turbochargers to have shaft speeds in that high number.

turbos can have up to 250,000 rpm ability, especially if they are super efficient small turbos running very high boost. superchargers almost always run 2-15 times your engine speed, and some engines do redline near 10k rpm


hell, you alternator runs 2-5 times your engine rpm.




its really amazing what good bearings allow! do note, most turbos rely on engine oil pressure to provide a film. and depending on stylenof supercharger, they can either have two bearings, or self incased in oil


anther perspective: they make superchargers for sportbikes, and some of them have engines revving over 15k rpm!

Last edited by M.Liston; 11-23-2012 at 12:09 AM.
M.Liston is offline  
post #5 of 8 Old 11-23-2012, 12:53 AM
Almost 1/2 Million Miles!
 
guapoman2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 967
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 94 Times in 85 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
M.Liston,

Thank you for your reply! I will have to take a look at these units for my Electric Ducted Fan RC Jet hobby as this is what we need to spin those Impeller blades for some really scary flights!!

Thanks again!
Guapo
guapoman2000 is offline  
post #6 of 8 Old 11-23-2012, 01:18 AM
Senior TN Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NE Arkansas
Posts: 1,022
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 34
Thanked 112 Times in 104 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Huh. Well I know squat about superchargers and jet engines, but that number seemed STUPID high.

Learn something new everyday. I didn't know we could spin anything 200,000 RPM's. Though, it didn't seem too crazy considering a dremel tool spins over 30,000. I want a dremel or die grinder that spins 200,000! lol. I suppose the cutting wheels would grenade themselves though.

1995 Chevrolet 1/2ton ext cab 4x4 6.5l Turbo Diesel
1998 Toyota Camry 5SFE Auto
2002 Chevrolet Impala
1997 Nissan Pathfinder 4x4
bolink654 is offline  
post #7 of 8 Old 11-23-2012, 10:31 AM
Senior TN Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,505
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 325 Times in 293 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Dental drill runs at 400,000RPM, some do 800,000RPM
RonR is offline  
post #8 of 8 Old 11-23-2012, 12:53 PM
Senior TN Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Sonoma CA
Posts: 1,442
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 166 Post(s)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 173 Times in 160 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
dental drills have radius ~ 0.1cm and thus radial g-force of only 178,880 at 400kRPM

while that SC has a radial g-force of 1,502,592 at 200kRPM with a rotor radius of 3.36cm

and with decent boost levels you'll need everything to be forged and heavy duty to survive this torture: not impossible but not cheap or easy.

Interesting discussion here:
http://www.f1technical.net/forum/vie...php?f=3&t=5000

Last edited by tedmich; 11-23-2012 at 01:12 PM.
tedmich is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums > Toyota Passenger and Sports Car Forums > Camry and Solara Forum > 3rd & 4th Generation (1992–1996 & 1997–2001)

Bookmarks

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome