five speed automatic? - Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums


» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums > Toyota Passenger and Sports Car Forums > Camry and Solara Forum > 5th & 6th Generation (2002-2006 & 2007-2011)

5th & 6th Generation (2002-2006 & 2007-2011) Toyota Camry Discussion for years: 2002-2006 & 2007-2011 Topics of discussion range from fuel economy, safety, modifications, performance all involving America's favorite family car, the Toyota Camry.

ToyotaNation.com is the premier Toyota Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-29-2008, 10:54 PM   #1 (permalink)
New TN User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: mechanicsville, md
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View jasonscamry's Photo Gallery
five speed automatic?

i'm looking for a newer camry than my 99 camry v6 auto.
we're thinking about going four cylinder cause it's cheaper to buy and may get us a little better gas. (we'll see)
my question is, how much of a difference will i see in the five speed automatic (available 2005+) vs the old four speed auto (2004 and older)
i really wanted a five speed auto for my next car but i will really be limiting my choices, and it still wont outperform the old v6 anyways.
does anyone know how peppy these 05 and up four cylinders are, and if the tranny makes any difference.
i'd especially like to hear from someone who has owned both but anyone chime in please!
jasonscamry is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 06-29-2008, 11:05 PM   #2 (permalink)
Defender of the Universe
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 85
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View Miranthis's Photo Gallery
I sold my 98 LE 4 Cyl. and got a 2005 SE I4. The difference is night and day. lots of pep for a four, IMHO.
Miranthis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2008, 11:08 PM   #3 (permalink)
New TN User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: mechanicsville, md
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View jasonscamry's Photo Gallery
thanks but that one also had a different engine all together.
you had the old 2.2L
i am getting at least a 2002 for the legroom, which all have the 155+ hp 2.4L
with that same engine should i definitely go for the five speed automatic found in 2005-2006?
or is the 2002-2004 four speed just as good for performance and throttle response and passing/all that?
jasonscamry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 12:56 AM   #4 (permalink)
TN Post Wh*re
 
touringcamry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NorCal, USA
Posts: 6,895
Gameroom cash: $550825
Thanks: 5
Thanked 95 Times in 79 Posts
iTrader Score: 3 reviews
View touringcamry's Photo Gallery
The 97-01 I4 and the 02 models weigh approximately the same partly due to the aluminum engine in the 02. Also the vehicle is more fuel efficient over all despite the larger engine. I've managed to get about 35 MPG from my 07 which shares the engine with the 02, but I think my car is heavier and also has 5 speed manual rather than auto. I'm not sure how much difference there is between the 4 and 5 speed automatic models in terms of fuel savings.
__________________

2007 Camry 2.4L 5M
touringcamry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 03:03 AM   #5 (permalink)
Official TN Member
 
Rapid Roy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rowland Heights (LA)
Posts: 413
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View Rapid Roy's Photo Gallery
I thought that the 5 speed auto was only avaliable on the 07 and later when the body style changed. My wife has an 02 I4 and I have an 07 I4 SE. The fuel mileage is close enough between the two that I'd call it the same. The 07 is heavier, but the 5 speed helps offset the weight a little. The 07 feels larger and heavier. The 02 is feels peppier (sp) even with the 4 speed. The 07 just feels more sluggish. Not a lot but its noticable. If you drive the cars hard, they are almost the same, except that my SE handles much better. That only because of the "sport" suspension though.
Rapid Roy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 05:28 AM   #6 (permalink)
Bootyologist
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 1,524
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 1 reviews
View 2k4CamThrilla's Photo Gallery
4 banger definitely got some kick too it.
__________________

www.myspace.com/djkraz
2009 Toyota Camry SE-(BLK LEATHER,NAVI,Debaged,Blue LED shifter mod,20% Tint)
2004 Toyota Camry LE(SOLD)
1989 Ford Tempo AWD(SOLD)
2k4CamThrilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 07:47 AM   #7 (permalink)
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 67
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View sniper34's Photo Gallery
I think I read the 09 with 5 speed auto 0-60 was 8.9sec. Sounds good to me.
sniper34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 10:24 AM   #8 (permalink)
2008 Camry Hybrid
 
Yazovets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,501
Gameroom cash: $149932
Thanks: 7
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts
Supreme Member
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View Yazovets's Photo Gallery
Don't bother with the 4-banger on the Camry. The car is too heavy for you to achieve better fuel economy. You'll likely find yourself giving extra gas all the time. Besides, it is rather un-natural to hear 4-banger sounds from a nice full size sedan like that, isn't it?

If you have a V6, just give little gas, and the thing goes effortlessly. On the highway especially I think you will achieve better fuel economy simply because at like 120km/h (the normal highway cruising speed), the RPMs at 6th gear are only at 2000-2100rpm.
__________________
2008 Camry Hybrid | Magnetic Grey on Grey Leather | Bi-Xenon H1 4300K Retrofit | Italian Hertz Sound System (dash 4" EM 100, front 6.5" ECX 165, rear 6" x 9" ECX 690, 10" ES 250D sub in custom trunk enclosure, HDP5 5-channel amp, 1320W total power) | 4-sensor Rear Parking System | 20% Metallic Tint | Weathertech Floorliners | 17" ASA AR1 Rims | Toyo Garit KX (winter) | Toyo Versado LX II (summer)
Yazovets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 10:35 AM   #9 (permalink)
2002 Camry XLE 2.4L
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 78
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 1 reviews
View pepperdanky's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapid Roy View Post
I thought that the 5 speed auto was only avaliable on the 07 and later when the body style changed. My wife has an 02 I4 and I have an 07 I4 SE. The fuel mileage is close enough between the two that I'd call it the same. The 07 is heavier, but the 5 speed helps offset the weight a little. The 07 feels larger and heavier. The 02 is feels peppier (sp) even with the 4 speed. The 07 just feels more sluggish. Not a lot but its noticable. If you drive the cars hard, they are almost the same, except that my SE handles much better. That only because of the "sport" suspension though.
The Gen 5.5 ('05-'06) has a 5 speed auto transmission while the Gen 5 ('02-'04) has the 4 speed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yazovets View Post
Don't bother with the 4-banger on the Camry. The car is too heavy for you to achieve better fuel economy. You'll likely find yourself giving extra gas all the time. Besides, it is rather un-natural to hear 4-banger sounds from a nice full size sedan like that, isn't it?

If you have a V6, just give little gas, and the thing goes effortlessly. On the highway especially I think you will achieve better fuel economy simply because at like 120km/h (the normal highway cruising speed), the RPMs at 6th gear are only at 2000-2100rpm.
I average 30 MPG when driving somewhat aggressively with the 4 cylinder; on highway trips I get 40+.
pepperdanky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 10:45 AM   #10 (permalink)
Joined the dark side. :D
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: earth
Posts: 3,756
Gameroom cash: $654791
Thanks: 250
Thanked 91 Times in 73 Posts
iTrader Score: 1 reviews
View workerant's Photo Gallery
My V6 3.5L, I average at 28mpg. but with careful driving I can get up to 32mpg. (doing highway speed)

With I4, you can easier get better MPG. But with passengers, it slows. Anyway, I often have passengers so I choose V6. If not, I might consider I4 more.
workerant is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums > Toyota Passenger and Sports Car Forums > Camry and Solara Forum > 5th & 6th Generation (2002-2006 & 2007-2011)

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
ToyotaNation.com is an independent Toyota/Lexus enthusiast website. ToyotaNation.com is not sponsored by or in any way affiliated with Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. The Toyota, Lexus and Scion names and logos are trademarks owned by Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.