5th & 6th Generation (2002-2006 & 2007-2011)Toyota Camry Discussion for years: 2002-2006 & 2007-2011
Topics of discussion range from fuel economy, safety, modifications, performance all involving America's favorite family car, the Toyota Camry.
nice, these would make retroing quad hid projectors pretty easy. i wouldn't suggest getting them otherwise though... it looks like the headlights have H1 projectors which in terms of light output is worse than the oem headlights projector. but if you're more about form than function, by all means.
__________________
2005 Camry "LE"
TL HID Retrofit | OEM Fogs | SE Bumper | SE Grill | Factory Spoiler | Kosei K1 TS 18x7.5 | BC Racing Coilovers
TRD [RSB | Strut Tower Brace | Exhaust] || Rear Drum to Disc Swap
Oh my gosh, that's my car they used, and I clearly don't have the quad projectors installed. Probably stole the picture off my car domain.
hey maybe u should really do something about that, no? can u? i would try to..
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamrySExxx
looks like shit. Quad projectors or not.. looks cheap. Might as well spend the extra money on projectors for your fogs
haha i actually want projectors for my highs and my fogs, especially my fogs, just think itll project better hahah but im not going to buy that ugly headlights..
__________________ Black 2007 Camry LE V6 Current Mods: LED swap, OEM fog lights - 2500K Nokya, 8000K TSX HID retrofits, TRD drop-in air filter, TRD drop, dual Magnaflow Race Series 14851, Sportmax 962 18x8.5 w/ Nankang NSII 225/45/18
Last edited by sex_&_TRD87; 10-29-2008 at 12:46 AM.
So, what is ugly on them? Look the same as OEM except where the reflector is replaced with a projector. In general...I do not like reflector lights ;-)
Oh my gosh, that's my car they used, and I clearly don't have the quad projectors installed. Probably stole the picture off my car domain.
Whats stupid is that they said its installed on the car but the image of your car still has the amber reflector on the side and normal looking drl
Quote:
Originally Posted by sex_&_TRD87
hey maybe u should really do something about that, no? can u? i would try to..
Yes he can. He can email eBay and tell them that the seller stole image from his cardomain without permission and the image that is used does not have that product installed.
Whats stupid is that they said its installed on the car but the image of your car still has the amber reflector on the side and normal looking drl
Yes he can. He can email eBay and tell them that the seller stole image from his cardomain without permission and the image that is used does not have that product installed.
I don't understand the fuss about the picture. It does not show a license plate...just a regular black Camry. I also think the moment you post on Cardomain you render your rights as you make it public domain...and even if that is not the case, what you like to achieve with the claim on image theft? They use any other front picture of a Camry and call it a day...no harm to anybody in my mind. Going to court (even small claim) only makes sense if their is something to claim...you have to proof your loss, damage, etc...
I don't understand the fuss about the picture. It does not show a license plate...just a regular black Camry. I also think the moment you post on Cardomain you render your rights as you make it public domain...and even if that is not the case, what you like to achieve with the claim on image theft? They use any other front picture of a Camry and call it a day...no harm to anybody in my mind. Going to court (even small claim) only makes sense if their is something to claim...you have to proof your loss, damage, etc...
Yes, its a regular black camry, but they took the picture from darksparkz. No one said anything about going to court and no one would even think of going that far just over an image.
The fact that they are used an image without permission is wrong. Just like the craigslist seller using lammy's. Whats wrong is that they included an image of a car whether its darks or not, is that it doesnt even have the product installed.
Image says "SAMPLE INSTALLED PICTURE". Thats false advertisement when dark himself says he doesnt have that quad installed. You can tell just by looking at the picture. It still has the amber reflectors and turn signals and there is no projector in the drl/highbeam. So if posting on CarDomain and making image public..fine..thats fair game but they're deceiving buyers.
Yea, they're not hurting dark by taking his image without permission but its the principle. They took an image of a car that isnt theirs but at the same time, claiming the car has the quad projectors installed when it clearly doesnt.
I'm not arguing or disagreeing, just pointing out the facts.
If you're going to sell a product, dont take someones images especially when they dont even have said product installed. If you are, ask for permission. Its courtesy and respect. Although, dark should maybe be flabbergasted that they chose his car to be used out of all the other Camry's.
Surprised they didnt take his TSX output and claim that is what the quad projects look like
The AutoGuide.com network consists of the largest network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
AutoGuide.com provides the latest car reviews, auto show coverage, new car prices, and automotive news. The AutoGuide network operates more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share opinions as a community.
ToyotaNation.com is an independent Toyota/Lexus enthusiast website. ToyotaNation.com is not sponsored by or in any way affiliated with Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. The Toyota, Lexus and Scion names and logos are trademarks owned by Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.
"Just for Fun" 
Linear Mode
