Camry Vs. Venza

[ledebuhr1]

Looks like the Rx350 is about 10k more.

[thrawnis]

Whoa, sorry, forgot to mention that I was comparing the Venza V6 and RX350. And like I said, I am comparing two equivalently equipped vehicles, not the base models. I never take my car in for regular oil changes and basic service at the dealership so the cost of those things is not important. But if I need to get warranty work or something done, the Lexus service centers will offer loaner cars and are much more pleasant to deal with.

To answer the OP's question: Both vehicles are easy to drive, though the rearward visibility from the driving seat was far worse on the Venza. Both had plenty of power with the V6, but I doubt the 4-cyl Venza would be up to the task of moving that thing.

[Lauren]

Test drove one.

They are nice, but I personally did not like the big, boxy feel of it. Too many blind spots. Oh and I am not a fan of the crossover-type cars. Not bad looking, but not my cup of tea. Comparing it to a Camry is like comparing apples and oranges...

[Punks_Not_Dead5]

I like the look of the Venza more than the Lexus... I call it a Matrix on steroids..

[Northernstar804]

You won't get as much performance out of a V6 Venza as a SE V6 Camry since it rides higher so center of gravity is higher. Plus the suspension is different and Venza doesn't have V brace as well.

[MJZ]

The new RX looks amazing, the Venza is great but first impression that hits you is always as "Is that a Camry?".

PS, my Toyota dealership gives Loaner Camrys and Avalons for any warranty work needed for over a few hours/overnight.

[Lexxther]

I test-drove the Venza a couple of weeks ago. The handling is a little heavy compared to the Camry V6. It doesn't take off as quick as the Camry because of its weight. It is definately a comfortable ride.

[Pawel062]

it depends on what you want. if you want to put into the car more passengers or cargo then get a venza. if you want a sleeper car that can still take some baggage and 4 other people while doing a high 5 0-60 then get the camry. venza is almost lexus territory but u have to remember that you should compare highlander to rx350 and not venza. a full equipped venza has the options in there and i think the quality/ride to justify the price. though i do agree i'd rather take the lexus than the venza.

[Punks_Not_Dead5]

if you want a sleeper car that can still take some baggage and 4 other people while doing a high 5 0-60 then get the camry.

[ledebuhr1]

I wonder of the Venza interior and options is similar to what the gen 7 Camry will be like.

[njerald]

I don't waste my time wondering...............

[eddiefromcali]

You guys comparing the Venza with the RX are not comparing equivalent vehicles. The Venza is classified as a car with a tow rating of only 3500# with a 0-60 in 6.7secs. The Highlander, which is what I would use to compare against the RX has a tow rating of 5000#. Just do a comparison on the Toyota website and compre the Venza, Camry, HL and RX. The RX is 10K more than the Venza and HL and 14K more than the Camry. I drove one when looking at HLs and its a nice CAR (Toyota classifies it as a Sedan), I dont know if Id consider it a crossover though. The Nissan Murano (Which Ive had as well) is similar to the Venza but more crossoverish with a higher stance and more towing capacity. Just go test drive one and find out for yourself.

[Pawel062]

Originally Posted by Punks_Not_Dead5

hehe quote of the month

[sky03]

the options on the venza is nice
but gen6 camry>venza

[LOV]

I would get a Venza for its 4x4 capability and nicer interior.