2011 2.5L I4 Runs Better on 89 octane - Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums


» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums > Toyota Passenger and Sports Car Forums > Camry and Solara Forum > 5th & 6th Generation (2002-2006 & 2007-2011)

5th & 6th Generation (2002-2006 & 2007-2011) Toyota Camry Discussion for years: 2002-2006 & 2007-2011 Topics of discussion range from fuel economy, safety, modifications, performance all involving America's favorite family car, the Toyota Camry.

ToyotaNation.com is the premier Toyota Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-08-2012, 11:38 AM   #1 (permalink)
New TN User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 22
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View NuclearRat's Photo Gallery
Question 2011 2.5L I4 Runs Better on 89 octane

I stepped up to 89 recently and noticed an improvement in both mileage and low-rpm torque and acceleration. I figured there would be a noticeable improvement since this engine has a fairly high compression ratio. I got it close to empty and filled it up with 89. It took the computer about two days worth of driving to fully adjust timing to make use of the higher octane. I've been using 89 ever since.

I'm just curious if any of you have tried different octane ratings and noticed a difference in performance/mileage.
NuclearRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-08-2012, 07:00 PM   #2 (permalink)
New TN User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 28
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View C11Red's Photo Gallery
I have not tried that

But how much of mpg did you gain
C11Red is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 07:03 PM   #3 (permalink)
Need For Speed
 
arabianobsession's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 8,961
Gameroom cash: $1105000
Thanks: 131
Thanked 349 Times in 302 Posts
Lifetime Supreme Member
Garage
iTrader Score: 1 reviews
View arabianobsession's Photo Gallery
I have used both 89, 91, and 93 in my SE with a 6 speed manual and have noticed no difference whatsoever. The 2AR engine is not like the 2GR where it can change the timing.
__________________
6 speed manual 2011 Camry SE
2012 Honda Accord Coupe---1995 Ford Mustang---1985 AMC Eagle
arabianobsession is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 07:22 PM   #4 (permalink)
New TN User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 22
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View NuclearRat's Photo Gallery
Hmm.. Must be placebo effect :P

I've gained about 2mpg
NuclearRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 08:52 PM   #5 (permalink)
2010 Camry SE V6
 
BlackCamSe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Seaside Heights, New Jersey
Posts: 2,571
Gameroom cash: $462074
Thanks: 6
Thanked 36 Times in 30 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View BlackCamSe's Photo Gallery
I run 93 in my 2gr. Much better power. With a compression ratio of 10.8:1 it's deff worth it. Not sure what the compression of the 2ar is
__________________

Thanks netforcer for the awsome sig! You da man!
Quote:
Seatbelt! you're piloting a vehicle were dual vvt-i hitts harder then VTEC and the torquesteer can possibly snap your wrists
BlackCamSe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 09:06 PM   #6 (permalink)
One with the force
 
nuchieboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,309
Gameroom cash: $203299
Thanks: 5
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader Score: 2 reviews
View nuchieboy's Photo Gallery
Gen6

^
me too....only bp ultimate (93)
__________________
2009 Camry SE V6 loaded
Mods: Borla Dual Exhaust with no resonator, K&N Intake, 5k HID headlights and 5k HID foglights, LED Tail lights, Complete interior leds, Ultra Racing Front Strut Bar, Ultra Racing 19mm rear sway bar, 20% tint, Rosen navigation system, 19 inch ASA GT1 wheels
nuchieboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 09:06 PM   #7 (permalink)
Need For Speed
 
arabianobsession's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 8,961
Gameroom cash: $1105000
Thanks: 131
Thanked 349 Times in 302 Posts
Lifetime Supreme Member
Garage
iTrader Score: 1 reviews
View arabianobsession's Photo Gallery
I believe 10.5 but see my above post.
__________________
6 speed manual 2011 Camry SE
2012 Honda Accord Coupe---1995 Ford Mustang---1985 AMC Eagle
arabianobsession is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 09:32 PM   #8 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: hk
Posts: 63
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View julyaric720's Photo Gallery
With a compression ratio of 10.8:1 it's deff worth it.
julyaric720 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 11:07 PM   #9 (permalink)
2010 Camry SE V6
 
BlackCamSe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Seaside Heights, New Jersey
Posts: 2,571
Gameroom cash: $462074
Thanks: 6
Thanked 36 Times in 30 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View BlackCamSe's Photo Gallery
Gen6

Quote:
Originally Posted by arabianobsession View Post
I have used both 89, 91, and 93 in my SE with a 6 speed manual and have noticed no difference whatsoever. The 2AR engine is not like the 2GR where it can change the timing.
Any modern car running OBDII can adjust timing based on the octain of the fuel being used. Timing and spark advance is constantly monitored and changed by the ECM by using the inputs of many sensors. One of which is the knock sensor. When you use a lower grade fuel the ecm will retard the timing based on inputs from the knock sensor, making the plugs fire earlier to prevent detonation. which can rob some power. When you use a higher grade fuel the knock sensor tells the ecm that there is no detonation and will then advance the timing. But with a compression ratio of only 10.4:1 you shouldnt notice much of a difference.
__________________

Thanks netforcer for the awsome sig! You da man!
Quote:
Seatbelt! you're piloting a vehicle were dual vvt-i hitts harder then VTEC and the torquesteer can possibly snap your wrists

Last edited by BlackCamSe; 01-08-2012 at 11:11 PM.
BlackCamSe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 07:58 AM   #10 (permalink)
New TN User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 22
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View NuclearRat's Photo Gallery
Well, the reason I switched octane to begin with is because I heard what sounded like a ping when I goosed it from a stop while the engine was cold. It could have just been the sound of the intake or something, but it sounded a lot like a ping. Since switching to 89 I haven't heard it make the sound since and then I started noticing smoother acceleration and it seems to get up to speed a lot easier, with less gas pedal travel. I'm wondering if ethanol is to blame for needing to step up to 89 octane.. It could also be the winter blend.. I use BP.. I've tried Chevron 87 too, though and still hear a ping every now and then.. Which the owners manual says is normal, actually...

I will say though that this engine does not like 93 octane. It takes longer to get started on 93 octane.
NuclearRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 08:31 PM   #11 (permalink)
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: reno
Posts: 78
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View mmm666's Photo Gallery
I run chevron 87 all the time on my 2006 camry v6. I get 30 mpg all the time.

I suggest you run chevron 87 on your 2011 camry and sleep well.
mmm666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 08:53 PM   #12 (permalink)
I'll Beat your Porsche!
 
2011SECAMRY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Jose
Posts: 90
Thanks: 18
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View 2011SECAMRY's Photo Gallery
I always run Chevron 91 regardless of what the factory tells me the min octane rating is (87) The car runs smooth and has great power.. Even if your car doesn't suggest to I would run 91 all the time. Its just better for the motor and all around performance. For and extra 2.00 bucks a tank it is totally worth it to use 91 or higher. Just my .02
__________________

2011 Camry SE V6 Loaded
K&N Intake || Tein Suspension || 6000K HID Headlights ||
3000K HID Foglight's || 20% Tint || UR Strut Bar || UR Rear 23MM Sway Bar || StopTech Drilled Rotors || Hawk Pads ||
Owning it at the track! See Below:
http://youtu.be/1Vm6PNearEU?hd=1&t=1m30s

Last edited by 2011SECAMRY; 01-09-2012 at 08:57 PM.
2011SECAMRY is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 09:21 PM   #13 (permalink)
^__^
 
alexorozco92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Anaheim, Ca
Posts: 547
Gameroom cash: $266000
Thanks: 19
Thanked 25 Times in 21 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View alexorozco92's Photo Gallery
I wish California had 93.
I use Chevron 91, no complaints here!
__________________
Low'N Slow Crew


08 G37: Ksport Coilovers, Varrstoen ES 2.2.2 19x9.5/10.5 +12, SPC Camber Kit
08 Camry: http://www.toyotanation.com/forum/showthread.php?t=386218
alexorozco92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 10:44 PM   #14 (permalink)
I ♥ (.Y.)
 
GT-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: California
Posts: 7,978
Gameroom cash: $819821
Thanks: 76
Thanked 116 Times in 108 Posts
iTrader Score: 16 reviews
View GT-R's Photo Gallery
Damn you guys with 93!!!

I wish I can feed my 2GR 93 too... but stuck with 91.
GT-R is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2012, 11:00 AM   #15 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NoVa
Posts: 895
Gameroom cash: $216100
Thanks: 18
Thanked 43 Times in 40 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View BlackG5's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmm666 View Post
I suggest you run chevron 87 on your 2011 camry and sleep well.
this.

all this "feels more powerful, runs better, etc" is garbage. the cars were designed and tuned(ecm) to run on 87.

My dad's Z06 can run on 87, its all in what the computer tells it to do. Too much timing advance with lower octane and it'll ping.

Ask Paul@Dezod Motorsports how dynamic the ecu in the tC is(same as the 2az camry)-- he said it's always changing and trying to find the knock threshold even on cars with piggyback ecu's, which basically means, run 87 octane because the car will figure it out.

If it makes you sleep better to waste money on fuel then so be it.
BlackG5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums > Toyota Passenger and Sports Car Forums > Camry and Solara Forum > 5th & 6th Generation (2002-2006 & 2007-2011)

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:10 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
ToyotaNation.com is an independent Toyota/Lexus enthusiast website. ToyotaNation.com is not sponsored by or in any way affiliated with Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. The Toyota, Lexus and Scion names and logos are trademarks owned by Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.