Wrapper

"Sharx35" <sharx35@hotmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>
>"Ray O" <rokigawa@tristarassociatesDOT.com> wrote in message
>news:b4e59$43aba429$180fead6$11808@msgid.meganewsservers.com...[color=green]
>>
>> "Built_Well" <bw@bbbb.com> wrote in message
>> news:6ZGdnfFRDqfGxDbeRVn-rw@sysmatrix.net...[color=darkred]
>>>I may give in to my local dealer's price. Over the
>>> phone today, the sales manager came down to 18,800 from
>>> $18,950 (out-the-door with a $50 Doc. fee).
>>>
>>> It's still above the 18.2 I can get one-hundred miles
>>> away, but the local sales manager said that subtracting the
>>> current $500 rebate from the LE's INVOICE price of 19,250
>>> gives 18,800 (with $50 doc fee).
>>>
>>> Hmm, Edmunds says this car has an INVOICE of between about
>>> $18,800 and $18,950, not the $19,250--yet two different dealer's
>>> today both stated the invoice as 19,250 ($300 to $450 more than
>>> Edmunds). Somebody's messing with the invoice figures?? Could
>>> it be Edmunds or the 2 dealers? [chuckle][/color]
>>
>> I don't think Edmunds includes Toyota Dealer Advertising Association fees,
>> which would account for the price difference.[/color]
>
>This whole thing is bloody bullshit. Can you imagine buying ANY kind of
>appliance, for example, with an
>advertising charge tacked on to the invoice price?
>
>[/color]
Christ yes...next they'll be charging a storage fee for the time
the car sat on their lot for God's sake.
--

-Gord.
(use gordon in email)