Wrapper

On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:11:20 -0500, "Mike Hunter"
<mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Look here
>[url]http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/060216_cheney_sherriff_report.pdf[/url]
>
>mike hunt[/color]

Very interesting!

I entered the GPS coordinates in a program to see exactly where
Cheney bagged a lawyer...

[color=blue]
>
>
>"Scott in Florida" <MoveOn@outa.here> wrote in message
>news:vj6av1hf98shddm274fif67hn53oth9kid@4ax.com...[color=green]
>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:13:33 -0500, Sean Elkins
>> <sean_elkins@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>In article <jR2Jf.16384$rH5.11484@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
>>> "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>GIANT SNIP
>>>>
>>>> So, really, all the Cheney-haters have to go on is two men out shooting
>>>> and having a few beers with a couple of women not their wives, one guy
>>>> who ends up shot, the shooter refusing to talk to the Sheriff until the
>>>> next morning or to the press until 4 days later, a detailed account of
>>>> an unavoidable accident given to the local press 21 hours later by
>>>> somebody who did not see it, an evasive but false insinuation that none
>>>> of the shooters were drinking which was later deleted, and the doctor
>>>> downplaying for days the fact that the injuries were severe enough to
>>>> be life-threatening and inconsistent with some of the details of the
>>>> official account. That's all. Nothing remotely suspicious, not like,
>>>> say, Kerry's war record, or Hillary's involvement in Vince Foster's
>>>> death.
>>>>
>>>> That's what's so great about the Bush administration, and Cheney in
>>>> particular; even if nothing whatsoever remotely bad happened, they
>>>> cover everything up until it looks like the plot of a bad film noir;
>>>> because of course they know what they would do with any information
>>>> they got about any incident, however innocent, involving their
>>>> political opponents, and how their loyal public swallows the Koolaid
>>>> without question and asks for more."
>>>
>>>Isn't this all about Cheney's "personal life"?
>>>
>>>I thought what we learned from Monicagate is that "his personal life
>>>doesn't matter." Both involved shots to the facial area. The only
>>>difference is that Cheney's was accidental.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Why should this be news----it doesn't impact his ability to run the
>>>country? Isn't that the line we heard so many times after Monicagate?
>>>BTW, this is a rhetorical question because someone was actually
>>>physically injured, versus just being humiliated for life. I realize the
>>>difference, but I do seriously ask why we aren't supposed to care what
>>>HillBilly does in the Oral Office while we are supposed to care what
>>>Cheney does in a Texas field?[/color]
>>
>> Excellent....
>>
>> Would it be a double standard? <g>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Scott in Florida[/color]
>[/color]
--

Scott in Florida