Wrapper

No re-write. As I quoted again for Scott, I wrote:

"oval office sex and lying
about it"

Maybe the problem with you right wingers is that you cannot read.


"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:xO2cnSxNIdFXZ2jeUSdV9g@ptd.net...[color=blue]
> Some folk are always trying to rewrite history. The impeachment of
> President Clinton, himself a lawyer, was not for having sex on the job,
> that charge was not part of the indictment. It was for the criminal
> offence of lying under oath to federal investigators. Perjury is a 'high
> crime' and certainly more than a 'misdemeanor' for which an elected
> official can be charged. The only 'politics' involves was those Senators
> that voted not to remove him from office, in spite of the evidence
> presented before them that he did in fact commit perjury and had belatedly
> admitted to the world on TV that he did in fact commit perjury.
>
>
> mike hunt
>
>
> "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> news:5jaJf.12691$Nv2.9336@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...[color=green]
>> Dumb analysis. Everyone was pissed about Clinton oval office sex and
>> lying about it. The only division was whether it was worth impeaching
>> him over it. When people start talking about impeaching Cheney because
>> he shot the guy, than you might have something to bitch about.[/color]
>[color=green][color=darkred]
>>>>Why should this be news----it doesn't impact his ability to run the
>>>>country? Isn't that the line we heard so many times after Monicagate?
>>>>BTW, this is a rhetorical question because someone was actually
>>>>physically injured, versus just being humiliated for life. I realize the
>>>>difference, but I do seriously ask why we aren't supposed to care what
>>>>HillBilly does in the Oral Office while we are supposed to care what
>>>>Cheney does in a Texas field?
>>>
>>> Excellent....
>>>
>>> Would it be a double standard? <g>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Scott in Florida[/color]
>>
>>[/color]
>
>[/color]