Wrapper

Yes re-write. That is what the Clinton supporters wanted you to believe,
that is was only about sex in the ORAL office. It was the perjury in the
Pauly Jones case. The impeachment had nothing to do with Lewinsky.



mike hunt


"Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:L6pJf.227$5M6.141@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...[color=blue]
> No re-write. As I quoted again for Scott, I wrote:
>
> "oval office sex and lying
> about it"
>
> Maybe the problem with you right wingers is that you cannot read.
>
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:xO2cnSxNIdFXZ2jeUSdV9g@ptd.net...[color=green]
>> Some folk are always trying to rewrite history. The impeachment of
>> President Clinton, himself a lawyer, was not for having sex on the job,
>> that charge was not part of the indictment. It was for the criminal
>> offence of lying under oath to federal investigators. Perjury is a 'high
>> crime' and certainly more than a 'misdemeanor' for which an elected
>> official can be charged. The only 'politics' involves was those Senators
>> that voted not to remove him from office, in spite of the evidence
>> presented before them that he did in fact commit perjury and had
>> belatedly admitted to the world on TV that he did in fact commit perjury.
>>
>>
>> mike hunt
>>
>>
>> "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote in message
>> news:5jaJf.12691$Nv2.9336@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...[color=darkred]
>>> Dumb analysis. Everyone was pissed about Clinton oval office sex and
>>> lying about it. The only division was whether it was worth impeaching
>>> him over it. When people start talking about impeaching Cheney because
>>> he shot the guy, than you might have something to bitch about.[/color]
>>[color=darkred]
>>>>>Why should this be news----it doesn't impact his ability to run the
>>>>>country? Isn't that the line we heard so many times after Monicagate?
>>>>>BTW, this is a rhetorical question because someone was actually
>>>>>physically injured, versus just being humiliated for life. I realize
>>>>>the
>>>>>difference, but I do seriously ask why we aren't supposed to care what
>>>>>HillBilly does in the Oral Office while we are supposed to care what
>>>>>Cheney does in a Texas field?
>>>>
>>>> Excellent....
>>>>
>>>> Would it be a double standard? <g>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Scott in Florida
>>>
>>>[/color]
>>
>>[/color]
>
>[/color]