|
Re: Whats the deal with supras? (not a seinfeld skit)
"Geoff Miller" <geoffm@u1.netgate.net> wrote in message
news:e20qro$cgd@u1.netgate.net...[color=blue]
>
>
> I used to have a '90 Supra, in the body style that resembled
> (and was heavier than) the contemporary Firebird. It was one
> of the best cars I've ever owned. Mine was a non-turbo and
> so wasn't all that quick off the line, but it was comfortable
> and was extremely stable at high speeds. And boy, did it handle.
> The only reason I got rid of it was because I moved and had a
> long commute through the mountains, and the fuel bills were
> killing me.
>
>
>
> Geoff
>
> --
> [url]http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,19269-2011570,00.html[/url]
>[/color]
Yes, it is certainly NOT the most fuel-efficient car I have ever owned, but
I only drive 20 miles to work, and on a warm day, with the roof off and the
radio cranking, it is worth the premium price I pay to drive it!
Mine's an '88, non-Turbo with the sport roof. I don't know how much weight
having the removable panel adds, but the car weighs 4400 LBS!!!!!
It gets about 18 MPG, but I also have a leaky fuel tank, so I am losing some
to evaporation. The new tank (NO aftermarket, Toyota only, $336!!!) get
installed Saturday...
|