|
Re: OT-Do Unto Others not required
mark_digital© wrote:[color=blue]
>
> The judge awarded the plaintiff only the book value of his car but not
> what it would have cost to fix it. A repair would have exceeded book
> value by about 3 grand.
> I thought to myself, this isn't fair. The search for another car is
> going to take some time and expense. Acquiring another car will result
> in taxes, registration fees, etc.
> Shouldn't the defendant be liable for this too?
> The defendant admitted smashing the plaintiffs car. Admitted it was his
> fault. So how come you didn't pay the man? asked the judge. Because he
> never bothered to contact me he replied. The judge was livid. You screw
> up the man's car and then you make him chase you? the judge yelled. The
> judge continued, What are you? A moron?
>
> Which brings another question. Does the moron get the car?[/color]
While we are off topic here, I'm just going to chime in that I am
in the market for a new car, a 2006 Toyota Corolla. So I googled "how
to buy a new car" and the first hit was [url]www.carbuyingtips.com[/url]
Very interesting reading. I've learned a lot. And I have learned a
lot of how I was screwed in the past by car dealers. That was by my own
ignorance, and before I had internet.
I already know my credit score and I have my own financing, no trade
in, so there is no loss there.
Well, back to my research...
|