|
Re: Any Comments About the FJ Cruiser?
jim menning wrote:
[color=blue]
> "grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
> news:KVpyg.4095$gF6.1082@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>[color=green]
>>
>>I like the looks and features but am not impressed with the gas mileage. Who knows
>>how high gas will go? I heard as much as $2.20 higher next year.
>>
>>[/color]
>
>
> MPG I find acceptable for the performance and size, but of course we would all love
> to see it raised. I also think the price is in line with the performance, compared
> to other Toyotas.
>
> I love the looks and the off road performance capabilities. Driving/riding in the
> front seat is fantastic with the forward & side visibility and spaciousness. Getting
> into and riding in the back seat is for youths or adult contortionists only. The
> spare tire position blocks the majority of the rear view from the inside mirror.
> Definitely fun to drive.
>
> Recommendations:
>
> Stretch the wheelbase at least another 8-10 inches, to increase the rear seat area,
> allow adults to climb through the rear seat passenger doors, and increase the rear
> storage area.
>
> Move the spare tire to the roof, with a swing-down mount assembly. This would allow
> the rear doors to be redesigned to be more "trailer-friendly". As it stands now, you
> would have to completely disconnect most trailers in order to open the rear door on
> the FJ.
>
> Increase the colors available.
>
> Optional larger engine for those of us who want to have fun, and need to tow heavy
> loads. A larger engine would make this a great alternative to not only other
> less-capable SUV's, but also make it an alternative for many people to get away from
> having to own pickup trucks.[/color]
Or just buy a Land Cruiser...
It is what it is. If they make it wider, longer, taller, (heavier) etc.,
then it wouldn't be an FJ anymore... :>))
--
Tom - Vista, CA
|