Wrapper

Hey so why hasn't Bush blown NK up? Why not do it already? Why all this
talk at the UN?



"n5hsr" <n5hsr@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:vPSdncdRvN84KbDYnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@comcast.com...[color=blue]
>
> "dbu" <howardyno@jackass.com> wrote in message
> news:howardyno-53C967.18094511102006@news-rdr-03.rdc-kc.rr.com...[color=green]
>> In article <vAeXg.6351$2l5.4048@trnddc07>, "Truckdude" <notl@cox.net>
>> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> "n5hsr" <n5hsr@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>> news:CJCdnRQRL9PIFLbYnZ2dnUVZ_rmdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> > During the critial years from 1994 to 2000, Bill Clinton made 'deals'
>>> > with
>>> > them instead of curbing their nuclear appetite. Now we've got another
>>> > 'nuclear power' in the Pacific Rim.
>>> >
>>> > Just remember: Bill Clinton's friend are:
>>> >
>>> > The Chinese Communists
>>> > The Muslim Extremists
>>> >
>>> > And have been since at least 1982.
>>> >
>>> > Bill Clinton's legacy may be the end of this country before his wife
>>> > can
>>> > be elected Praisident and Reich Chancellor.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks, Bill.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Charles of Schaumburg.
>>> >
>>>
>>> That's right! Dubya needs to look into how Clinton could have let this
>>> happen! ;-}[/color]
>>
>> The proliferation of nuclear arms is a big problem and has been talked
>> about for decades. It is not a new problem nor is it an exclusive
>> problem of president Clinton or president Bush, or any other president,
>> it is a problem of the entire world. Renegade states like NK makes the
>> whole scenario very dangerous. NK refuses to join the international
>> community thereby making them isolated and unapproachable, an even more
>> precarious situation.
>> --
>>[/color]
>
> And they suckered Clinton into doing nothing for 6 years. . . . Talk
> about weapons of mass distruction.
>
> Charles of Schaumburg.
>[/color]