|
Re: OT - Mary Cheney's news
"JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:meJdh.6960$Ka1.5073@news01.roc.ny...[color=blue]
>" dbu," <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
>news:repubs-4C5815.18231806122006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=green]
>> In article <meudnfdBKtJ2wOrYnZ2dnUVZ_h-dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>> "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Reported to be pregnant, due in the spring. Now, this could prove
>>> interesting, re: conservatives' reaction(s)... Countrywide, or just
>>> here.
>>> <g>
>>>
>>> Cathy[/color]
>>
>> Could you explain this development.
>> --
>>[/color]
>
> "The vice president's office declined to elaborate on the circumstances of
> Mary Cheney's pregnancy."
>
> If you're too stupid to figure it out, it's none of your damned business.[/color]
Well, it's actually no one's business but hers - & her partner's. But there
is more than one possibility. If donor sperm - person she knows, non-IDed
donor, for example...
Cathy
[color=blue]
>
>[/color]
|
