|
Re: carburated or fuel injected?
Quote:
Originally posted by soulibrium
there is a starlet that someone was trying to tell to me, with a 4age swap with a side draft. now i dont understand why someone whould take out the fuel injectors with a carburator as a replacment?? is there a reason behind this? more power? better response? or is someone trying to be a baddas$ and wanna be different !? arnt carburators leff effecient then fuel injectors? can someone help me?
also, i see that lots of pepo change their fans from pump to electric. why? whats the reason for this ? does this improve performnace cause its not attached to the motor? less stress on engine? is that it? or is it just another one of these cool things that someone can do to make him/herself more unique??
im totally stumped !!
|
Carbs are way easier to setup unless you have a programmable ECU and it can be a bitch restringing all that wire.
Electric fans are better. There is a weight gain - with the addition of the electric motor but there is a significant HP gain about 5HP-15HP depending one the fan, even on cars with 'clutch' type cooling fans. The problem with pulley fans is that they are designed to move enough air at idle to provide cooling. Fan laws dictate HP1=HP2(rpm1/rpm2)^3 so you can see that the HP lost to the fan at higher RPM vs the lower RPM is equal to the CUBE of the speed ratio. In Canada it is also nice to not have the fan spinning on cold winter mornings because the car gets up to operating temperature faster.
__________________
Ricers - Imitate, Racers - Originate.
1989 Corolla GTS -4agze propane (rebuilding ... again)
2005 Subaru Legacy (we'll see if if lasts as long as the Yota's)
2008 Yaris
Last edited by rezzle; 05-30-2003 at 09:22 AM.
|