Quote:
|
Originally Posted by goooopher
How would cutting it down not make it shorter? The throw would be shorter...the top of the arm will travel a shorter dist from gear to gear...think about it...if u have a 2 foot shift arm its going to take longer to shift than a 6 inch shift arm...theoretically what you guys are saying you could get a longer shift arm that acts as a short shifter by somehow shortening the throw between gears..
|
If you think about a lever or a teeter-totter, this will make sense. The short throw shifter changes the fulcrum (or the pivot point) on which the shift lever's range of motion revolves around.
The diagram at the top is that with a short throw shifter.
The diagram in the middle is the standard shifter.
The diagram at the very bottom is a shortened shift lever.
So if you look at the top shifter, it's range of motion is far more limited compared to the other two, which means that the total distance that the lever will have to pivot is far less compared to the bottom two.
I just hope that the drawings clarify this - it's pretty late for me so maybe tomorrow I'll be able to explain it more clearly.
As for the gear box modifications - those are unnecessary because the kits typically add blocks that modify the distance that the linkage will have to travel (please correct me if i'm wrong). Also, in RWD transmissions there are bushings and spacers included in the kits that account for the distance from gear to gear.