|
Re: Nominates Rush Limbaugh for 2007 Nobel Peace Prize
One question - if Rush believes he is "right", why should he be
interested in compromising with "wrong"? Is there value to corrupting
your beliefs just for the sake of saying you reached an agreement? Is
that how you live your life?
On Feb 2, 12:10 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborea...@yahoo.com> wrote:[color=blue]
> "dbu" <n...@nojoke.com> wrote in message
>
> news:nspam-E7E14F.10213102022007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>[color=green]
> > It's about time.[/color]
>[color=green]
> > <[url]http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20070201/pl_usnw/landmark_legal_foundati[/url]...
> > nates_rush_limbaugh_for2007_nobel_peace_prize>[/color]
>[color=green]
> > And the tiny: [url]http://tinyurl.com/2oab7q[/url][/color]
>[color=green]
> > I don't want anyone to miss reading this fine article about a fine
> > deserving American being nominated for the Nobel Peace prize. He should
> > win it.
> > --[/color]
>
> Some critics blame him and a crop of imitators for splitting Americans
> further apart, making it more difficult for people of goodwill to forge a
> consensus on tricky issues. Limbaugh says that's not his problem. He has
> absolutely no interest in crossing the divide and forging compromise - and
> good reasons not to do so. "I always say my real purpose is to attract the
> largest audience I can, and hold it for as long as I can, so I can charge
> confiscatory advertising rates," the talk show host says.
>
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!
>
> dbu, you really need to get with some news sources aimed at adults. Sources
> which run stories that last longer than a beer commercial.
>
> ROFLMAO!!!!!![/color]
|