Wrapper

"ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172002249.036427.62530@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...[color=blue]
> On Feb 20, 12:01 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborea...@yahoo.com> wrote:[color=green]
>> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:xn0f2opww1shlcw000@news.readfreenews.net...
>>[color=darkred]
>> > ToMh, 2/20/2007,2:41:43 PM, wrote:[/color]
>>[color=darkred]
>> > [snipped][/color]
>>[color=darkred]
>> > I know you forgot to put the OT in the Subject line so I'll so it for
>> > you. Hopefully others who reply to you will follow suit.[/color]
>>
>> Great idea, for idiots who aren't quite sure if "Joe Bidens Iraq plan" is
>> off topic in an automobile newsgroup.[/color]
>
>
> To be fair, people actually come to this group to read about Toyotas
> (who knew?), and filter out the OT. As someone suggested some time
> ago using {OT} or OT: is easier to filter and is a good idea.
>[/color]


That's a mystery to me. It's not that hard to NOT LOOK at what you don't
want to read. However, there may be health issues which cause problems for
some people. The human brain naturally makes a chemical which causes us to
NOT remember absolutely everything we see all day. Without this chemical,
we'd be unable to focus. There would simply be too much stimulation from all
the sights and sounds. It's suspected that ADHD is related to an imbalance
with this chemical. (Trivia: Marijuana interacts directly with the chemical,
which explain a few things).

Maybe OT filters are for people with an imbalance of this chemical.