Wrapper

On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 21:15:35 +0000, tak wrote:
[color=blue]
>
> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno@AE86.gts> wrote in message
> news:rRYIh.722$S06.677@trndny08...[color=green]
>> On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 11:56:54 -0700, mack wrote:
>>
>>[color=darkred]
>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno@AE86.gts> wrote in message
>>> news:A2TIh.797$vV3.659@trndny09...
>>>> On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 00:05:02 -0500, badgolferman wrote: I agree with
>>>> Glenn Beck. If Congress (Democrats) have their way, this will turn
>>>> into another Vietnam, with the biggest expenditure being Body Bags.
>>>
>>> If my house is cold, I can save dough by simply turning on Glenn Beck's
>>> alleged show. The hot air rushing out of the tv will warm it up in no
>>> time.
>>>
>>> I don't understand his statement "...will turn into another Vietnam..."
>>> If
>>> he doesn't realize that it's already another Vietnam, he's asleep.
>>> But if our troops are not there, there'll be no need for body bags for
>>> them, only for Iraqis, and they can pay for them. Our troops will no
>>> longer be caught in the crossfire between the warring elements.[/color]
>>
>>
>> Well, the Dems have attached a 'rider' onto the budget bill that
>> analysts feel sure will cause Bush to veto it.
>>
>> This is absolute bullshit. Riders should be disallowed. If you have a
>> bill, the bill stands alone.
>>
>> So, although the Democrats aren't *SAYING* they want to cut funding for
>> the troops, their actions say a lot more than words.
>>
>> So, with less funding, troops will be ill-equipped, and unable to do the
>> job they were sent there to do.
>>
>> And, why don't you ask the TROOPS what they think?! I talk to plenty,
>> and they say they are doing a necessary job there. This is from people
>> who have been on the FRONT LINE, not sitting in a chair typing at a
>> keyboard. Of all the people I've talked to, I'd say about 85% say the
>> job they are doing there is needed, and about 40% were looking FORWARD
>> to going back!
>>
>>[/color]
> And how do you feel about Presidential "signing statements" if you have
> problems with "riders"?[/color]


Yeah, I got's problems with those, too...