3e carb engine - Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums
 

» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums > Toyota Nation Forums > Fuel Economy

Fuel Economy Forum for people to discuss their mileage and ways to improve it.

ToyotaNation.com is the premier Toyota Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-01-2008, 07:10 PM   #1 (permalink)
New TN User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dominican Republic
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View alanjoseph's Photo Gallery
3e carb engine

a 2000~ pounds car with a 3e carburated engine, 3 gears AT, 2.5inch exhaust pipes.. the aftermarket muffler its 2.5 inlet and 4" outlet

the rest is stock.. at this point im only getting around 30km per galon (18.7 mpg)

i think, not sure, before the aftermarket muffler the mpg was slightly higher (lets say 20 ~ 22 mpg).. but again not sure about this.

my average speed is at 50 - 70 kmph in city, im never at hwy.

my mpg its too low, for my type of car and driving. i dont accelerate and brake all the time, i let the car roll in N very often.

what could be the reason?
alanjoseph is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 06-04-2008, 09:56 AM   #2 (permalink)
New TN User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North Central Ohio
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View EHart6's Photo Gallery
Hummm.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by alanjoseph View Post
what could be the reason?
I don’t think you going to get much better than 22-23. My 89 Tercel 3e carb gets 37-38 mpg (all highway). If I run a mix of roughly 50/50 (city/highway) it drops to 30 “FAST”. Which means in the city I am only getting 22-23.

Stop and go, slow down / speed up is a killer on the fuel economy. Map out your driving and see if there is a route(s) that can hold you to a constant speed. It doesn’t matter if it 35, 45, or 55 as long as it is constant. Fewer the stops the better. I drive 10 miles out of my way to run 99% highway and 4 stop signs (60 mile commute @ 60mph). I could save the 10 miles but would have to drive through 2 towns, two dozen stop signs, and speeds ranging from 25 to 65.

I think your right about the exhaust, I read somewhere the larger exhaust helps at high rpm and takes away from the lower rpm. Unfortunately I am not an expert on this.
EHart6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 01:37 PM   #3 (permalink)
New TN User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dominican Republic
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View alanjoseph's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by EHart6 View Post
I don’t think you going to get much better than 22-23. My 89 Tercel 3e carb gets 37-38 mpg (all highway). If I run a mix of roughly 50/50 (city/highway) it drops to 30 “FAST”. Which means in the city I am only getting 22-23.

Stop and go, slow down / speed up is a killer on the fuel economy. Map out your driving and see if there is a route(s) that can hold you to a constant speed. It doesn’t matter if it 35, 45, or 55 as long as it is constant. Fewer the stops the better. I drive 10 miles out of my way to run 99% highway and 4 stop signs (60 mile commute @ 60mph). I could save the 10 miles but would have to drive through 2 towns, two dozen stop signs, and speeds ranging from 25 to 65.

I think your right about the exhaust, I read somewhere the larger exhaust helps at high rpm and takes away from the lower rpm. Unfortunately I am not an expert on this.
30 MILES per galon its still decent for me... but im running 30 KILOMETRES

30 MILES = 48KM

Last edited by alanjoseph; 06-04-2008 at 01:38 PM.
alanjoseph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 10:53 AM   #4 (permalink)
New TN User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North Central Ohio
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View EHart6's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by alanjoseph View Post
30 MILES per galon its still decent for me... but im running 30 KILOMETRES

30 MILES = 48KM
I think you miss read my numbers. With mixed city and highway driving my mileage drops to 30 mpg. If I do the math it puts the "City only" share at 22-23 MPG (34-35KM)
EHart6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 10:57 PM   #5 (permalink)
New TN User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dominican Republic
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View alanjoseph's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by EHart6 View Post
I think you miss read my numbers. With mixed city and highway driving my mileage drops to 30 mpg. If I do the math it puts the "City only" share at 22-23 MPG (34-35KM)
hmmm ok, i see... i just found weird that my little 2300 pounds car made only 30km/gallon (city) same as a Lexus is200 3500pounds~ with a 3s-ge engine, maybe its because the technology...
alanjoseph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 11:52 AM   #6 (permalink)
New TN User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North Central Ohio
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View EHart6's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by alanjoseph View Post
hmmm ok, i see... i just found weird that my little 2300 pounds car made only 30km/gallon (city) same as a Lexus is200 3500pounds~ with a 3s-ge engine, maybe its because the technology...
Actually it comes down to a percentage / balance thing.

IF you have a car that makes 100 HP but use only 33 HP going down the highway at 60 mph that doesn't sound very efficent. Now say your car only has 50 HP and uses 33 HP sounds more efficent. Right?

Here's the rub. (example)

At 100 HP you have plenty of power to start off, ie. easy on the gas pedal. Unlike the 50 HP car you have less power to use in town, ie the rap of slow no power cars.

Case in point, my 3.8 ltr V6 in a windstar mini van does as good if not just a tad better than my 1.5 ltr I4 in town (both automatics). With the van I do not even have to touch the gas to get going. It will shift up through all the gears ideling (level ground). The Tercel will not shift untill the motor hits 1,800 rpm. Thats where the HP curves cross (800 rpm V6 / 1800 rpm I4)
EHart6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 01:30 PM   #7 (permalink)
New TN User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dominican Republic
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View alanjoseph's Photo Gallery
so, let me see if i understand... what you'r saying is:

two cars moving at the same speed in town (45mph). a L6 and a L4

at low speed and easy on the gas pedal, the L6 will be more fuel efficient as it requires less effort than the L4 to reach and maintain 45mph.

im i correct?
alanjoseph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2008, 02:53 PM   #8 (permalink)
New TN User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North Central Ohio
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View EHart6's Photo Gallery
Reach YES/NO, Maintain NO. (automatics)

The low end torque on the v6 allows the speed to come up (shifting as it goes) with little or no pedal. The lack of low end torque in the I4 requires the use of additional fuel (over idle) to get up to speed (more pedal). Maintaining speed is completely different. Now the V6 is using more fuel, generating more power than needed, to stay a given speed. The I4 is closer to its max generation thus using less fuel by not generating the extra unused power. However the difference in engine sizes offset the additional pedal use in the I4. So depending on habits (as in mine) it is a break even in mpg. It is quite possible there is a V6 vehicle that can beat a small I4 for city mpg. A 3.8 liter is a fairly good size V6. A 2.8 or 3.0 might do much better. Many factors come in to play (i.e. torque, size, gearsets, weight, resistance, etc.)

Example (my vehicles);

Reach (accelerate moderately, level ground, and no headwind)
The V6 requires ~18 HP to accelerate the van. At 800 rpm it generates (~140 ft lbs) roughly 23 HP. Thus the van moves quite easily at idle (no pedal) and will even shift gears. The I4 requires ~12 HP to accelerate the car. At 800 rpm it generates (~65 ft lbs) 10 HP (One reason the I4 needs to idle at 1000 rpm, to get 12 HP). It also must exceed the 12 HP to shift (i.e. 1400 rpm or ~17 HP). To match the V6 torque/weight/resistance/accelerate ratio; the I4 must turn ~1800 RPM (requiring more fuel as you press the pedal). The more times you accelerate, the more fuel you are using. Keep in mind though engine sizes offset the additional fuel in my case.

Maintain (60 mph, level ground, and no headwind)
V6 3.8 in overdrive turns ~2300 rpm. At ~180 ft lbs torque that equates to 79 HP. The V6 requires ~28 HP to maintain 60 mph. A difference of ~51 HP or only about 35% of the power generated being used (however this leaves plenty of room for headwinds and inclines). The I4 1.5 on the other hand, in overdrive turns ~2500 rpm. At ~68 ft lbs torque that equates to ~34 HP. The I4 requires ~22 HP to maintain 60 mph. A difference of ~12 HP or ~60% of the power generated being used (doesn’t leave much room for head wind and inclines though). So it beats out the V6 in maintaining Highway speed using more of the generated power (by percentage) and shows up as better MPG by not producing the extra HP (fuel has a fixed amount of energy, how, and when, you use it makes the difference).

This is also why most V6 and V8’s (I have driven) will have their actual C / H mpg within 5-7 miles of each other (My Windstar V6, 22 City / 27 Highway, My F250 V8, 11 City / 17 Highway). The I4’s generally having a 10+ gap (My Tercel I4, 22 City / 37 Highway, and My 05 Corolla I4, 30 City / 41 Highway). The Corolla is a VVT 1.8 130 hp (better low end torque). I love that car……..

Keep in mind this is actual experience based on my driving habits and not published data. How you use you “foot will greatly affect these numbers. In my case, mostly highway, I can sacrifice the low end torque for better use of power generated at highway speeds.
EHart6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2008, 03:43 PM   #9 (permalink)
New TN User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dominican Republic
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View alanjoseph's Photo Gallery
very interesting, thank you for taking the time to explain
alanjoseph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2008, 02:52 PM   #10 (permalink)
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: N.W. USA
Posts: 351
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View igonuts2's Photo Gallery
on american vehicles w/auto trans you can damage the trans by coasting in neutral. some one here can verify if toyo autos are similar. since the tourqe converter cant be disingaged they build up pressure with no place to go. so caution up sir. trying to help.
__________________
92 pu 4x4 V6 5sp 3'' lift
89 tercel 3dr 3e 5sp

'56 willys pu 4x4 "rat". under destruction. i'm in heaven!!!!!!!
igonuts2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2008, 05:53 PM   #11 (permalink)
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 799
Gameroom cash: $117630
Thanks: 10
Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
View gideon1331's Photo Gallery
My grandma's corolla wagon with the 3TC engine and a 3 speed auto struggles to do better than 18-20MPG. It's curb weight is just under the 2000 pound mark.

With these older tech cars, you have to remember that with very few exceptions, carburettors are very inefficient compared to even older fuel injection systems. This is not so much that they give the car more gas than it needs all the time, just that there are times when a fuel injection system can drastically reduce or even cut off the fuel while a carburettor cannot.

In addition, until recently automatic transmissions couldn't match a manual in terms of economy. Also, since you have a 3 speed, there is no overdrive (if the top gear has a lower than 1:1 ratio it's not by enough to make a difference). At 70kph overdrive would make a difference.

Adding in age-related factors, it would easily explain the mileage you are getting.
__________________
Toyotas in the family/next of kin:
1982 Corolla Wagon, 1989 Corolla DX, 1991 Previa LE, 1993 Previa LE,
1993 Pickup, 1994 Corolla DX, 1995 Avalon XL, 1996 Camry XLE, 1998 Avalon XL,
1998 Sienna CE, 1999 Camry XL, 2000 Camry XLE, 2002 Tundra, 2003 Tundra,
2003 ES 300, 2004 Camry XLE, 2005 Tacoma
gideon1331 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums > Toyota Nation Forums > Fuel Economy

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
ToyotaNation.com is an independent Toyota/Lexus enthusiast website. ToyotaNation.com is not sponsored by or in any way affiliated with Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. The Toyota, Lexus and Scion names and logos are trademarks owned by Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.