Quote:
Originally Posted by johncal
I wouldn't. That's $120 for 2 lights. I paid like less than 20 bucks for both with shipping. besides, I like the clear lens. The red LED's look great when theyt light up and it breaks up the look of the back... jsut my opinion though.
|
If you read the description of that ebay auction
1= a set of two.
the price wouldn't matter to a playa like me but i'm just pointing it out in case the additonal 64 bucks was holding anyone back.
Just sayin
On a bright note. If I could find some really intense Red LED's in a smaller cluster, I bet I could cut out a smaller hole in the factory reflector and mount the led's and still have a reflector ring.
I really wish there were some of these cars in the salvage. I like to be able to put my stuff back to stock and I would rather not bust up the factory parts and not have anything to put it back together with.
The internet is a powerful drug.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automot...etroreflectors
Retroreflectors
(also reflex reflectors) produce no light of their own, but rather reflect incident light back towards its source, i.e., another driver's headlight. They are regulated as automotive lighting devices, and specified so as to account for the separation between a vehicle's headlamps and its driver's eyes. Thus, vehicles are conspicuous even when their electrically-powered lighting system is deactivated or disabled.
Regulations worldwide require each vehicle to be equipped with rear-facing red retroreflectors.[5][15] North American regulations also require side-facing retroreflectors, amber in front and red in the rear.[5] Sweden, South Africa and other countries have at various times required white front-facing retroreflectors.
Before another argument starts, Please don't blame me for putting some relevant information in this debate about whether or not red reflectors are real,required,imaginary or anything else.