Toyota top in 2008 intial quality (non luxury) - Page 2 - Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums

100$ GUY · 06-11-2008, 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ECHOKnight2000

I'm the same. MB way up there?? I wouldn't think they improved their reliability that fast or quality problems of the past. Maybe they did. Although know this is initial, so after a day or so the MB is back in the shop.

Good one!

Think so too

100$ GUY · 06-11-2008, 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jegan_V

Acura is surprisingly low, is it because the buyers feel ripped off? Kia is a big surprise to me...I haven't found much to suggest they're using quality materials or even quality parts. Nissan's biggest problem is interior materials, they're poor in comparison to the other Japanese. Mitsubishi...I actually haven't found any problems with them, I thought they were above average. Chrysler however deserves its low spot. Very bad materials, really cheaply designed interior Sebring in particular gives me back pain, in the case of the Sebring/Avenger whole trim falls apart and as for reliability some of our 2008 Caravans have A/C units that failed shortly.

Me neither, well at least with the new lancer.

Jegan_V · 06-11-2008, 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 100$ GUY

Me neither, well at least with the new lancer.

I really want to drive a new Lancer because of the way it looks, sadly my workplace doesn't get any. We do however have Outlanders and Endeavors and all our customer feedback on those is positive.

EvoFire · 06-12-2008, 06:05 AM

^ I think the Outlander is a nice car, and the exterior is my cup of tea too. Better than the 1st Gen Highlander I'm driving right now at least.... But... I took a look at the car when I was checking out the new Lancer. It seems like the gaps on the rear seats where the hinges for folding is HUGE, its really ugly to look at.