Quote:
Originally Posted by Bakemono
Station wagons have a stigma of not being, "cool". Its kind of the same thing with minivans.
SUVs are a status symbol. Its a sign that you are successful and SUVs make a person feel bigger and more powerful.
Id have no problem driving a hatchback. I couldnt care less if anyone thinks my car is cool. For me, its all about having a vehicle that gets me where I want to go in comfort and that gets the highest possible gas milage with the least possible number of breakdowns/repairs.
Last year, my brother and his wife were looking to replace her '00 Lincoln LS with something that was more fuel-efficient (the LS only gets about 23-25 mpg) and had a little more room inside. They have a black Lab and when they take long trips, with the dog and their luggage and a cooler and what not; it gets little crowded in the LS, so they usually end up taking my brother's Ford Super. The SD only gets about 14 mpg (its got a 6.8L V10 under the hood), so the fuel bill gets a little crazy on long trips.
Anyways, she really liked the Edge, but it was going to cost them something like $600 a month for 7 years. Granted, the Edge had a lot of cool features. It has the panoramic glass roof, AWD, Sirius and power everything; but come on!
I told them they could buy a used Ford Freestyle or Toyota Highlander for way less than that, but they didnt like that idea. They said the Freestyle was too plain and they wont buy a Toyota because its foreign (yet they will buy an Edge thats made in Mexico  ).
They ended up just keeping the LS.
|
Ah, the Freestyle and the Gen1 Highlander: probably the best examples of modern station wagons that I can think of. I have a good friend who bought a rare used 4-cylinder Highlander. (The 4-cylinder Highlanders are very, very rare here in Canada.) He was not somebody who would buy a SUV, and through discussion about his decision, we decided that he bought it because it was the only example of a station wagon that he could find.
I like the Freestyle, and I was hoping that the Gen2 Highlander would have turned out more like the Freestyle, instead of being more aggressively SUVish, as it did turn out. I don't understand how Ford failed with the Freestyle. Instead of trying to market the Freestyle, they went and produced the Flex. If Ford could not sell the Freestyle, will it be able to sell the Flex?
I think SUVs also cater to an insecurity that Americans have: SUVs (and big personal use pickup trucks) make them feel powerful in a "threatening" world.
I am venturing off topic, now, am I not?