Caligula's horse, Bush's lawyer

Caligula put his horse in the Roman Senate (as a Senator) to show his
contempt for it. Bush has done the same with his idiot personal
lawyer; putting her on the Supreme Court.

"I know her heart"...no I see why Democrats hate this idiot so much.
Duh, idiot, you're not supposed to nominate cronies who have no
experience as a judge, constitutional scholar/thinker/writer/historian.
He might as well have named his first grade teacher. She probably has
a nice heart too. The idiot.

In article <1128728388.175877.286370@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
st-bum <kennykabuki@yahoo.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Caligula put his horse in the Roman Senate (as a Senator) to show his
> contempt for it. Bush has done the same with his idiot personal
> lawyer; putting her on the Supreme Court.
>
> "I know her heart"...no I see why Democrats hate this idiot so much.
> Duh, idiot, you're not supposed to nominate cronies who have no
> experience as a judge, constitutional scholar/thinker/writer/historian.
> He might as well have named his first grade teacher. She probably has
> a nice heart too. The idiot.
>[/color]
I'm probably missing something here. Which of them drives a Toyota?

Brent

Caligula had an 85 Tercel. That's why he put his horse on the Senate,
he didn't need it any more.

st-bum, 10/8/2005,12:33:56 AM, wrote:
[color=blue]
> Caligula had an 85 Tercel. That's why he put his horse on the Senate,
> he didn't need it any more.[/color]

The horse was a Mustang or Pinto?

--
"You don't know what pressure is until you've played for five dollars a
hole with only two in your pocket." -- Lee Trevino

Better do a bit of research if that is what you believe. A full 1/3 of
those, whose appointments to the Supreme Court where approved by the US
Senate, were never judges prior to their appointment. ;)

mike hunt


"st-bum" <kennykabuki@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1128728388.175877.286370@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...[color=blue]
> Caligula put his horse in the Roman Senate (as a Senator) to show his
> contempt for it. Bush has done the same with his idiot personal
> lawyer; putting her on the Supreme Court.
>
> "I know her heart"...no I see why Democrats hate this idiot so much.
> Duh, idiot, you're not supposed to nominate cronies who have no
> experience as a judge, constitutional scholar/thinker/writer/historian.
> He might as well have named his first grade teacher. She probably has
> a nice heart too. The idiot.
>[/color]

Problem is not that she was never a judge. PRoblem is she's just a
random lawyer. No evidence she has any knowledge or has ever done any
thinking about constitutional or Supreme Court matters.

She's just a hack. Former co-workers of hers describe her as an
officious busy-body. It's a disgrace.

There's a background of conservative thinkers, lawyers, judges, etcl. a
mile deep. All infinitely more qualified than her. Most of whom have
sweat blood for their positions. And he picks her because he "knows
her heart". It would be like the Yankees losing their 3rd baseman and
not going to their bench or even their farm league but installing the
assistant to the traveling secretary for 3rd baseman. Costanza for 3rd
base!

st-bum wrote:[color=blue]
> Caligula put his horse in the Roman Senate (as a Senator) to show his
> contempt for it. Bush has done the same with his idiot personal
> lawyer; putting her on the Supreme Court.
>
> "I know her heart"...no I see why Democrats hate this idiot so much.[/color]

hahaha!!! you go!!!
[color=blue]
> Duh, idiot, you're not supposed to nominate cronies who have no
> experience as a judge, constitutional scholar/thinker/writer/historian.
> He might as well have named his first grade teacher. She probably has
> a nice heart too. The idiot.[/color]

haha. He thinks he's Jesus Christ as well.

In article <1128806745.143201.311910@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"st-bum" <kennykabuki@yahoo.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Problem is not that she was never a judge. PRoblem is she's just a
> random lawyer. No evidence she has any knowledge or has ever done any
> thinking about constitutional or Supreme Court matters.
>
> She's just a hack. Former co-workers of hers describe her as an
> officious busy-body. It's a disgrace.
>
> There's a background of conservative thinkers, lawyers, judges, etcl. a
> mile deep. All infinitely more qualified than her. Most of whom have
> sweat blood for their positions. And he picks her because he "knows
> her heart". It would be like the Yankees losing their 3rd baseman and
> not going to their bench or even their farm league but installing the
> assistant to the traveling secretary for 3rd baseman. Costanza for 3rd
> base![/color]

You're very mistaken.

If you say so, I must be.