|
Re: Burnore Road Trip
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:06:12 +0000, "TheBillRodgers" <TBR@sheep.com>
wrote:
[color=blue]
>"davidj92" <davidj92REMOVE@sigecom.net> wrote:[color=green]
>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>> snip[color=darkred]
>> >> Dates back to when all PD thought they had to have full-size
>> >> vehicles (for hauling perps)
>> >
>> > BULL. The CV has more room under the body for mods such as better
>> > suspension and bigger powerplant.
>> >[/color]
>>
>> And your point is? I stated what patrolmen want and you state what
>> certain characteristics are in certain vehicles.
>>[color=darkred]
>> > . with rear-wheel drive (more controllable in skids and etc).
>> >
>> > More bullshit. FW drive is much more controllable in skids. If they
>> > made a good fwd CV, the fuzz would be all over it.
>> >[/color]
>>
>> The PD's can only buy the type of vehicles that manufactures build as
>> "Police Equiped". Maybe you could explain why you're seeing many PD's
>> using Impala's, Malibu's, Taurus and Intrepids?
>> Living in your own world, not the real world aren't you?
>>[color=darkred]
>> >> Most of this was due to personal preference, not managements. Many
>> >> cops complained when anti-lock brakes were added as they couldn't
>> >> skid to a stop (many times sideways) and claimed this was a faster
>> >> stop.
>> >
>> > More total bullshit. Sliding to a stop is something done in Starsky
>> > and Hutch. Not something they'd WANT to do in real life.
>> >[/color]
>>
>> Your bullshit. You obviously have no knowledge of PD's or your one of the
>> problems. Many cops WANT to slide to a stop, and in the city I live in
>> many cars were wrecked when they first had Anti-lock brakes for this
>> reason. Chief issued an order banning sliding stops.
>>[color=darkred]
>> >> Many PD's are
>> >> switching to smaller front-wheel drive vehicles as manufactures make
>> >> them available with "police pachages" to save on purchase cost and
>> >> fuel.
>> >> Also, Ford undercuts the purchase price to fleets, government and
>> >> etc. to get their vehicles exposed, i.e. cheapest vehicle you can
>> >> buy. (They even did it on retail Taurus and the next smaller one at
>> >> one time so they could claim #1 title, which Toyota beat by offering
>> >> quality Camry's and Corolla's, not cheapness.)
>> >
>> > Of course, GM is still the number one car maker, not Ford. So you're
>> > wrong again.[/color]
>>
>> You're still living in your own world. I was talking about two specific
>> models and your talking about total vehicles sold.
>> I was involved in the purchasing process in my city for over 19 years and
>> can state under oath what happens in the bid process for fleets from
>> Ford.
>>[color=darkred]
>> >
>> > Obviously, you've no clue what you're talking about.[/color]
>>
>> I think it's more than apparant who's clueless. Unless you have some
>> factual information I'm done feeding the troll.
>> davidj92
>>[/color]
>Check out the gary burnore mini movie:
>
>[url]http://media.putfile.com/Garyandfriends[/url]
>
>[/color]
That's still the best you can do, isn't it?
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
|
Linear Mode
