OT secretary -->joke<--

A well-stacked young advertising secretary wore tight knit dresses that
showed off her figure, especially when she walked. Her young,
aggressive boss motioned her into his office one afternoon and closed
the door.

Pointing to her tightly covered derriere, he asked, "Is that for sale?"

"Of course not!" she snapped angrily, blushing furiously.

Unchanged, he replied quietly, "Then, I suggest you quit advertising
it."

badgolferman wrote:[color=blue]
> A well-stacked young advertising secretary wore tight knit dresses that
> showed off her figure, especially when she walked. Her young,
> aggressive boss motioned her into his office one afternoon and closed
> the door.
>
> Pointing to her tightly covered derriere, he asked, "Is that for sale?"
>
> "Of course not!" she snapped angrily, blushing furiously.
>
> Unchanged, he replied quietly, "Then, I suggest you quit advertising
> it."[/color]

50 years ago, yeah.

Nowadays, the punchline would be Mr. Agressive in the unemployment
line.

"Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1136464987.347916.260250@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...[color=blue]
>
> badgolferman wrote:[color=green]
>> A well-stacked young advertising secretary wore tight knit dresses that
>> showed off her figure, especially when she walked. Her young,
>> aggressive boss motioned her into his office one afternoon and closed
>> the door.
>>
>> Pointing to her tightly covered derriere, he asked, "Is that for sale?"
>>
>> "Of course not!" she snapped angrily, blushing furiously.
>>
>> Unchanged, he replied quietly, "Then, I suggest you quit advertising
>> it."[/color]
>
> 50 years ago, yeah.
>
> Nowadays, the punchline would be Mr. Agressive in the unemployment
> line.[/color]

Thanks to fucking politically correct DEMONrat LIEbralism.

[color=blue]
>[/color]

Menhaden35 wrote:[color=blue]
> "Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1136464987.347916.260250@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...[color=green]
> >
> > badgolferman wrote:[color=darkred]
> >> A well-stacked young advertising secretary wore tight knit dresses that
> >> showed off her figure, especially when she walked. Her young,
> >> aggressive boss motioned her into his office one afternoon and closed
> >> the door.
> >>
> >> Pointing to her tightly covered derriere, he asked, "Is that for sale?"
> >>
> >> "Of course not!" she snapped angrily, blushing furiously.
> >>
> >> Unchanged, he replied quietly, "Then, I suggest you quit advertising
> >> it."[/color]
> >
> > 50 years ago, yeah.
> >
> > Nowadays, the punchline would be Mr. Agressive in the unemployment
> > line.[/color]
>
> Thanks to fucking politically correct DEMONrat LIEbralism.
>[/color]

Oh, we know about you old Menhaden. You long for the old days when
women had no rights.

Learning Richard, 1/5/2006, 7:43:07 AM,
<1136464987.347916.260250@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> 50 years ago, yeah.
>
> Nowadays, the punchline would be Mr. Agressive in the unemployment
> line.[/color]

No, they were in his office with no witnesses. An investigation would
uncover that she was the one uncovering.

--
"The moral rot of political correctness runs deep today in both
national parties." ~ Patrick J. Buchanan

badgolferman wrote:[color=blue]
> Learning Richard, 1/5/2006, 7:43:07 AM,
> <1136464987.347916.260250@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
> > 50 years ago, yeah.
> >
> > Nowadays, the punchline would be Mr. Agressive in the unemployment
> > line.[/color]
>
> No, they were in his office with no witnesses. An investigation would
> uncover that she was the one uncovering.
>[/color]

Actually a friend of ours recently went back to work in a law
office.... and within two weeks one of the office managers told her she
needed to lower her hemline.

The office manager was a woman, though.

Honestly, I support a permanent ban on hemlines below the knee on women
under the age of ... ok we'll work that out in committee.

Sharx35 wrote:
[color=blue][color=green]
>> Nowadays, the punchline would be Mr. Agressive in the unemployment
>> line.[/color]
>
>Thanks to fucking politically correct DEMONrat LIEbralism.[/color]

More likely thanks to closed-minded Christian fundies.

Learning Richard, 1/5/2006, 4:01:34 PM,
<1136492695.512871.230120@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>
> badgolferman wrote:[color=green]
> > Learning Richard, 1/5/2006, 7:43:07 AM,
> > <1136464987.347916.260250@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> > > 50 years ago, yeah.
> > >
> > > Nowadays, the punchline would be Mr. Agressive in the unemployment
> > > line.[/color]
> >
> > No, they were in his office with no witnesses. An investigation
> > would uncover that she was the one uncovering.
> >[/color]
>
> Actually a friend of ours recently went back to work in a law
> office.... and within two weeks one of the office managers told her
> she needed to lower her hemline.
>
> The office manager was a woman, though.
>
> Honestly, I support a permanent ban on hemlines below the knee on
> women under the age of ... ok we'll work that out in committee.[/color]

Oh, so it's OK to be a sexist, I see... Or is that just being a
red-blooded male?

--
"A zebra does not change its spots." ~ Al Gore

badgolferman wrote:[color=blue]
> Learning Richard, 1/5/2006, 4:01:34 PM,
> <1136492695.512871.230120@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
> >
> > badgolferman wrote:[color=darkred]
> > > Learning Richard, 1/5/2006, 7:43:07 AM,
> > > <1136464987.347916.260250@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > 50 years ago, yeah.
> > > >
> > > > Nowadays, the punchline would be Mr. Agressive in the unemployment
> > > > line.
> > >
> > > No, they were in his office with no witnesses. An investigation
> > > would uncover that she was the one uncovering.
> > >[/color]
> >
> > Actually a friend of ours recently went back to work in a law
> > office.... and within two weeks one of the office managers told her
> > she needed to lower her hemline.
> >
> > The office manager was a woman, though.
> >
> > Honestly, I support a permanent ban on hemlines below the knee on
> > women under the age of ... ok we'll work that out in committee.[/color]
>
> Oh, so it's OK to be a sexist, I see... Or is that just being a
> red-blooded male?[/color]

Its OK for me to do whatever I want. You must sit and learn.

badgolferman wrote:[color=blue]
> Learning Richard, 1/5/2006, 4:01:34 PM,
> <1136492695.512871.230120@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
> >
> > badgolferman wrote:[color=darkred]
> > > Learning Richard, 1/5/2006, 7:43:07 AM,
> > > <1136464987.347916.260250@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > 50 years ago, yeah.
> > > >
> > > > Nowadays, the punchline would be Mr. Agressive in the unemployment
> > > > line.
> > >
> > > No, they were in his office with no witnesses. An investigation
> > > would uncover that she was the one uncovering.
> > >[/color]
> >
> > Actually a friend of ours recently went back to work in a law
> > office.... and within two weeks one of the office managers told her
> > she needed to lower her hemline.
> >
> > The office manager was a woman, though.
> >
> > Honestly, I support a permanent ban on hemlines below the knee on
> > women under the age of ... ok we'll work that out in committee.[/color]
>
> Oh, so it's OK to be a sexist, I see... Or is that just being a
> red-blooded male?[/color]

Well, I don't wanna see you in a skirt with a hemline above the knee.

Learning Richard, 1/6/2006,8:18:26 AM, wrote:
[color=blue]
>
> badgolferman wrote:[color=green]
> > Learning Richard, 1/5/2006, 4:01:34 PM,
> > <1136492695.512871.230120@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> > >
> > > badgolferman wrote:
> > > > Learning Richard, 1/5/2006, 7:43:07 AM,
> > > > <1136464987.347916.260250@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > 50 years ago, yeah.
> > > > >
> > > > > Nowadays, the punchline would be Mr. Agressive in the
> > > > > unemployment line.
> > > >
> > > > No, they were in his office with no witnesses. An investigation
> > > > would uncover that she was the one uncovering.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Actually a friend of ours recently went back to work in a law
> > > office.... and within two weeks one of the office managers told
> > > her she needed to lower her hemline.
> > >
> > > The office manager was a woman, though.
> > >
> > > Honestly, I support a permanent ban on hemlines below the knee on
> > > women under the age of ... ok we'll work that out in committee.[/color]
> >
> > Oh, so it's OK to be a sexist, I see... Or is that just being a
> > red-blooded male?[/color]
>
> Its OK for me to do whatever I want. You must sit and learn.[/color]

I kind of thought this is your mantra all the time you've been on this
forum.

--
"Truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it." ~
Flannery O'Connor