OT ALITO APPROVES THE STRIP SEARCHING OF 10 YEAR OLD GIRLS

Scott in Florida wrote:[color=blue]
> On 12 Jan 2006 14:04:45 -0800, "Learning Richard"
> <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
> >
> >Mike Hunter wrote:[color=darkred]
> >> What is the problem with a female police officer
> >> searching a 10 year old[/color]
> >
> >hmmm maybe you'd like to do the searching?[/color]
>
> of the female police officer?
>[/color]

Having a hard time following the thread?

On 11 Jan 2006 17:53:31 -0800, "Learning Richard"
<learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>
>Scott in Florida wrote:[color=green]
>> On 11 Jan 2006 14:14:12 -0800, "Learning Richard"
>> <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> >So long as he keeps his perverted hands off of MY kids...
>> >
>> ><http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2006/01/alito-day-2-strange-adventures-in.php>
>> >
>> >It got scary when Senator Leahy, and later Senator Kennedy, pushed
>> >Alito on:
>> >
>> >...
>> >
>> > * Alito's approval, in a dissent criticized by Judge Michael
>> >Chertoff, now Secretary of Homeland Security, of an unauthorized strip
>> >search of a 10-year-old girl, and of an unauthorized gunpoint
>> >"eviction" of a farmer and ransacking of his home.
>> >
>> >...
>> >
>> >What a neoconservative sicko.[/color]
>>
>> Get your facts right....[/color]
>
>You want some fucking cop sticking her finger up your 10 year old
>daughter's ass? Alito doesn't seem to have a problem with it.[/color]

Hell yes....if I'm a drug dealer....I'd expect it...
[color=blue]
>[color=green]
>>
>> Tell us about the drug dealer and the 10 year old girl....[/color]
>
>I don't give a shit. Ever heard of fucking xrays? If they were that
>concerned they could've xrayed her before they forced the little 10
>year old girl to remove all of her clothes and be physically violated
>in the most disgusting and vile way.[/color]

Then tell her drug dealer parents to choose another way to steal
money...
[color=blue]
>[color=green]
>>
>> Kennedy made an ass out of himself today....no surprise.[/color]
>
>Kennedy was on point, 100%, and he got his way too.[/color]

Kennedy does not have any idea wtf the point is...

He is a plant by Karl Rover to make the Demonrats look like idiots.

[color=blue]
>[color=green]
>>
>> Alito is going strong and the demonrats are losing big time![/color]
>
>You should be ashamed of yourself, but you're not...[/color]

Truth hurts....does it not?


--

Scott in Florida

Mike Hunter wrote:[color=blue]
> US Border Guards and the TSA have the legal authority, if they simply
> 'believe' there is probable cause, to search anyone, anytime in any
> manner, without a search warrant.[/color]

As usual, clueless.
[color=blue]
> What is the problem with a female
> police officer searching a 10 year old, in a known drug house who
> could be hiding drugs, with a search warrant?[/color]

You don't know the details of the warrant OR the search.
[color=blue]
> US border guards and
> the TSA routinely find contraband on babies, often even in their
> diapers ;)[/color]

Get your checkbook out & hats off to the "war on drugs".

Scott in Florida wrote:[color=blue]
> On 11 Jan 2006 17:53:31 -0800, "Learning Richard"
> <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
> >
> >You want some fucking cop sticking her finger up your 10 year old
> >daughter's ass? Alito doesn't seem to have a problem with it.[/color]
>
> Hell yes...[/color]

wow Scott we missed your psycho neocon babble.

On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:01:49 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote:
[color=blue]
>On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:55:31 -0500, Scott in Florida wrote:
>[color=green]
>> On 11 Jan 2006 14:14:12 -0800, "Learning Richard"
>> <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>So long as he keeps his perverted hands off of MY kids...
>>>
>>><http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2006/01/alito-day-2-strange-adventures-in.php>
>>>
>>>It got scary when Senator Leahy, and later Senator Kennedy, pushed
>>>Alito on:
>>>
>>>...
>>>
>>> * Alito's approval, in a dissent criticized by Judge Michael
>>>Chertoff, now Secretary of Homeland Security, of an unauthorized strip
>>>search of a 10-year-old girl, and of an unauthorized gunpoint
>>>"eviction" of a farmer and ransacking of his home.
>>>
>>>...
>>>
>>>What a neoconservative sicko.[/color]
>>
>> Get your facts right....
>>
>> Tell us about the drug dealer and the 10 year old girl....
>>
>> Kennedy made an ass out of himself today....no surprise.
>>
>> Alito is going strong and the demonrats are losing big time![/color]
>
>Hey! Have you seen Keneedy's new book? Written for kids?
>
>What got me was the cover, a drawing of My Favorite State Senator in front
>of Congrees, with his dog:
>
>A portugese WATER dog...
>
>Named SPLASH!
>
>I think I'd get a different breed...
>With a different name...
>And stop buying Oldsmobiles...[/color]

Mary Jo was not available for comment.....

--

Scott in Florida

"FanJet" <FanJet27@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:43c5d280$0$3945$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net...[color=blue]
> Jeff Strickland wrote:[color=green]
>> Did you bother to read the background on this story?
>>
>> The cops served a duly signed warrant to search the residence and all
>> occupants. The people that lived there were known to hide stuff
>> inside the bodies of other people living in the house. Why would you
>> think that a little girl could not be employed to hide stuff inside
>> her body, especially when those that are doing the hiding are facing
>> jail if they don't hide?
>> All Alito did was uphold the search warrant that the cops had. The
>> cops were sued privately for exercising the warrant, and Alito simply
>> said they were insulated from being sued because they had a warrant.
>> If you want to get mad, get jmad at the judge that issued/signed the
>> warrant that the cops were acting on.[/color]
>
> The cops have PLENTY of discretion in matters like this. There is NO
> excuse for such conduct.[/color]


They used female cops to do the body search of the girl and another woman in
the house -- the girl's mother if I'm not mistaken. The female cops had no
reason to NOT handle the situation any differently than they did, and they
had legal justification. Sure, they could have done it differently, but why?
They do body seraches all of the time, what makes this one any different?

[color=blue]
> That said, Alito is right. They had the warrant. Too bad it's nearly
> impossible to hire good cops nowadays.
>
>[/color]
Fuck you, asshole.

Jeff Strickland wrote:[color=blue]
> "FanJet" <FanJet27@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:43c5d280$0$3945$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net...[color=green]
> > Jeff Strickland wrote:[color=darkred]
> >> Did you bother to read the background on this story?
> >>
> >> The cops served a duly signed warrant to search the residence and all
> >> occupants. The people that lived there were known to hide stuff
> >> inside the bodies of other people living in the house. Why would you
> >> think that a little girl could not be employed to hide stuff inside
> >> her body, especially when those that are doing the hiding are facing
> >> jail if they don't hide?
> >> All Alito did was uphold the search warrant that the cops had. The
> >> cops were sued privately for exercising the warrant, and Alito simply
> >> said they were insulated from being sued because they had a warrant.
> >> If you want to get mad, get jmad at the judge that issued/signed the
> >> warrant that the cops were acting on.[/color]
> >
> > The cops have PLENTY of discretion in matters like this. There is NO
> > excuse for such conduct.[/color]
>
>
> They used female cops to do the body search of the girl and another woman in
> the house -- the girl's mother if I'm not mistaken. The female cops had no
> reason to NOT handle the situation any differently than they did, and they
> had legal justification. Sure, they could have done it differently, but why?
> They do body seraches all of the time, what makes this one any different?
>
>[color=green]
> > That said, Alito is right. They had the warrant. Too bad it's nearly
> > impossible to hire good cops nowadays.
> >
> >[/color]
> Fuck you, asshole.[/color]

You a pig? You sound stupid enough to be one.

Do you ask that because you like to search the body cavities of all the
guys, little richard?

mike hunt



"Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1137103485.625503.105610@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...[color=blue]
>
> Mike Hunter wrote:[color=green]
>> What is the problem with a female police officer
>> searching a 10 year old[/color]
>
> hmmm maybe you'd like to do the searching?
>[/color]

Jeff Strickland wrote:[color=blue]
> "FanJet" <FanJet27@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:43c5d280$0$3945$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net...[color=green]
>> Jeff Strickland wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> Did you bother to read the background on this story?
>>>
>>> The cops served a duly signed warrant to search the residence and
>>> all occupants. The people that lived there were known to hide stuff
>>> inside the bodies of other people living in the house. Why would you
>>> think that a little girl could not be employed to hide stuff inside
>>> her body, especially when those that are doing the hiding are facing
>>> jail if they don't hide?
>>> All Alito did was uphold the search warrant that the cops had. The
>>> cops were sued privately for exercising the warrant, and Alito
>>> simply said they were insulated from being sued because they had a
>>> warrant. If you want to get mad, get jmad at the judge that
>>> issued/signed the warrant that the cops were acting on.[/color]
>>
>> The cops have PLENTY of discretion in matters like this. There is NO
>> excuse for such conduct.[/color]
>
>
> They used female cops to do the body search of the girl and another
> woman in the house -- the girl's mother if I'm not mistaken. The
> female cops had no reason to NOT handle the situation any differently
> than they did, and they had legal justification. Sure, they could
> have done it differently, but why? They do body seraches all of the
> time, what makes this one any different?
>[color=green]
>> That said, Alito is right. They had the warrant. Too bad it's nearly
>> impossible to hire good cops nowadays.
>>
>>[/color]
> Fuck you, asshole.[/color]

There we go.