OT America Cheers - Democrats sit down during the State of the Union Speach

The Democrats were shown to be the anti American dorks
I've been pointing out for over a year!

Bush shows the Democrats for what they are.....

Great Speach George W. Bush!

Wonderful to see the Democrats cheering because they
kept GWB from fixing Social Security.

Wonderful to see the Democrats sitting down when the country was
cheering.

Thanks Democrats....you have shown your true colors.

.....and that Virginia governor's rebuttal?

ROFL

saying how physically responsible he is....Hell he HAS to be....

Like Florida Virgina HAS to balance their budget.

--

Scott in Florida

All rhetoric and no substance, like all his speeches. Come back when he
has a real plan. Actions speek larger than words and we all know Bush's
idea of supporting alternative fuels is to give the oil companies a 10
billion dollar tax break so they can research alternative fuels. He's a
joke and only an empty headed moron like yourself would think that was
a great speech.

On 1 Feb 2006 10:23:55 -0800, "ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>All rhetoric and no substance, like all his speeches. Come back when he
>has a real plan. Actions speek larger than words and we all know Bush's
>idea of supporting alternative fuels is to give the oil companies a 10
>billion dollar tax break so they can research alternative fuels. He's a
>joke and only an empty headed moron like yourself would think that was
>a great speech.[/color]


How about 71 percent of the American People?

You libs have shown your true colors.

I have succeeded!

--

Scott in Florida

On 1 Feb 2006 10:23:55 -0800, "ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>All rhetoric and no substance, like all his speeches. Come back when he
>has a real plan. Actions speek larger than words and we all know Bush's
>idea of supporting alternative fuels is to give the oil companies a 10
>billion dollar tax break so they can research alternative fuels. He's a
>joke and only an empty headed moron like yourself would think that was
>a great speech.[/color]

It WAS a great speech!
------------------------------------------------

[url]http://www.cnn.com/2005/ALLPOLITICS/02/02/sotu.poll/index.html[/url]

Poll: Bush wins converts among speech-watchers

Friday, February 4, 2005 Posted: 12:16 PM EST (1716 GMT)

s

(CNN) -- President Bush's State of the Union address raised support
for his policies on health care and Social Security among people who
watched the speech, according to a CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll conducted
Wednesday night.

The percentage of respondents who said the president's proposals in
those areas will help the country rose 15 points from when the same
question was asked of the same people in the two days before the
speech.

In the post-speech sample, 70 percent of respondents said Bush's
policies on health care were positive, while 66 percent approved of
the president's plan for Social Security.

Bush showed almost as much improvement on Iraq, with 78 percent of
respondents saying U.S. policy there is heading in the right
direction, a 12 percentage point increase over pre-speech polling.

Overall, 77 percent of respondents said Bush is taking the country in
the right direction after the speech compared to 67 percent
beforehand.

The strong positives for the president's policies may in part be a
reflection of the poll's sample. Of the 485 people surveyed, 52
percent identified themselves as Republicans, 25 percent as Democrats
and 22 percent as independents.

The poll was done by telephone interviews and has a margin of error of
plus or minus 5 percentage points.

Respondents still said Iraq was the most important issue facing the
president and the nation in the coming year -- 30 percent, compared
with 23 percent for terrorism.

Social Security was the top domestic issue, with 19 percent of
respondents saying it should be the government's main focus.

Overall, Bush got very positive or positive reactions to his speech
from 86 percent of respondents, his best numbers since the State of
the Union address he gave January 29, 2002 -- just four-and-a-half
months after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 -- when 94
percent of those polled gave him positive marks


--

Scott in Florida

The Democrats' classless display was a real low point in American
politics, but entirely consistent with their "let's ignore reality and
pimp some votes from the clueless" mentality. Cindy Sheehan would fit
right into that crowd. Hopefully there are enough thinking people left
in America to bounce the most egregious violators out of office.

Polls always go up after a speech. Come back in a month.

On 1 Feb 2006 10:43:37 -0800, "ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Polls always go up after a speech. Come back in a month.[/color]


On CNN?

ROFLMAO

CNN polls are gospel....you guys like Artsie Fartsie quote them all
the time!
--

Scott in Florida

On 1 Feb 2006 10:37:45 -0800, "Mark" <bogusmailmark@yahoo.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>The Democrats' classless display was a real low point in American
>politics, but entirely consistent with their "let's ignore reality and
>pimp some votes from the clueless" mentality. Cindy Sheehan would fit
>right into that crowd. Hopefully there are enough thinking people left
>in America to bounce the most egregious violators out of office.[/color]


It sure was obvious!

What great campaign footage this will be.

Mrs. Clintoon standing and proud of standing in the way of Social
Security Reform.

Great stuff.

And that idiot from Virginia (they elected that guy as governor?) and
his rebuttal?

It can NOT get any better...

--

Scott in Florida

Sort of like when the Republicans would sit during Clintons speech. I
bet
you were outraged then too.

As for Sheehan, that was a classless act, but has nothing to do with
the speech.

You know, I've just subscribed to this newsgroup, and I've already
noticed that there are an awful lot of fascists in here.

Can we just talk about Toyotas?

Ray G.

What part of "Polls always go up after a speech. Come back in a month."
did you not get?

Ray G., 2/1/2006, 1:55:47 PM,
<1138820147.719319.212480@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> You know, I've just subscribed to this newsgroup, and I've already
> noticed that there are an awful lot of fascists in here.
>
> Can we just talk about Toyotas?
>
> Ray G.[/color]

What do YOU consider a Fascist?

--
"I do not belong to any organised political party: I'm a democrat." ~
Will Rogers

On 1 Feb 2006 10:57:00 -0800, "ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>What part of "Polls always go up after a speech. Come back in a month."
> did you not get?[/color]


Every word of it.....

--

Scott in Florida

On 1 Feb 2006 10:55:40 -0800, "ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Sort of like when the Republicans would sit during Clintons speech. I
>bet
>you were outraged then too.
>
>As for Sheehan, that was a classless act, but has nothing to do with
>the speech.[/color]

The classless act was perpetrated by a Democrat!

The places the Democrats sat is the horrible thing.

The Democrats will pay dearly for being un American...

--

Scott in Florida

On 01 Feb 2006 19:00:39 GMT, "badgolferman"
<REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Ray G., 2/1/2006, 1:55:47 PM,
><1138820147.719319.212480@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> You know, I've just subscribed to this newsgroup, and I've already
>> noticed that there are an awful lot of fascists in here.
>>
>> Can we just talk about Toyotas?
>>
>> Ray G.[/color]
>
>What do YOU consider a Fascist?[/color]

Did you uncover one?

ROFL

--

Scott in Florida