|
Re: 2006 Matrix or Scion xA?
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 23:15:57 -0600, Ray O wrote:
[color=blue]
>
> "Sean Elkins" <sean_elkins@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:sean_elkins-624610.23591012022006@news.iglou.com...[color=green]
>> In article <d8bca$43efd6bd$180fead6$9641@msgid.meganewsservers.com>,
>> "Ray O" <rokigawa@tristarassociatesDOTcomn> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> "ll" <lkslittle@REMOVEcomcastTHIS.net> wrote in message
>>> news:43EF7E90.357161A5@REMOVEcomcastTHIS.net...
>>> > It's looking like we're going to buy another car.
>>> > Economical operating costs (for a student) is a priority.
>>> > Thinking about a Matrix or a Scion xA.
>>> > Everything has pros and cons.
>>> > Your thoughts?
>>>
>>> I believe the xA costs less than the Matrix, fuel economy and tire
>>> replacement costs should be lower as well.[/color]
>>
>> The tire thing is something to consider. My Matrix has 16" wheels,
>> making tire costs automatically higher.
>>
>> There's a definite economy in buying something with 14" or 15" wheels.[/color]
>
> Yup, our Sequoia is going to need new 17" shoes soon :-([/color]
Actually, in a lot of cases, the 16's and 17's are getting LESS expensive,
because they are being made in larger numbers than the 14's and 15's
--
A young girl I know told me I drive like an old man
I told her, actually, I drive like Mario Andretti.
It's just that too many other people on the road
drive like Paul Tracy...
|