OT WMD and bin Laden

[url]http://abcnews.go.com/International/IraqCoverage/story?id=1734490&page=1[/url]

Oh please tell me this isn't true....

You mean there were WMDs?

You mean bin Laden talked with Saddam?

Oh my.....

My President got it right after all?

It just can't get too much better than this...

--

Scott in Florida

In article <48u5229g4dlksncmrbbi39qv532pltgloq@4ax.com>,
Scott in Florida <MoveOn@outa.here> wrote:
[color=blue]
> [url]http://abcnews.go.com/International/IraqCoverage/story?id=1734490&page=1[/url]
>
> Oh please tell me this isn't true....
>
> You mean there were WMDs?
>
> You mean bin Laden talked with Saddam?
>
> Oh my.....
>
> My President got it right after all?
>
> It just can't get too much better than this...[/color]

We knew about this for some time. These bits and pieces will come out
as documents are declassified.
--
"Welcome to President Clinton, Mrs. Clinton, and my fellow astronauts."

Al Gore

Scott in Florida wrote:[color=blue]
> [url]http://abcnews.go.com/International/IraqCoverage/story?id=1734490&page=1[/url]
>
> Oh please tell me this isn't true....
>
> You mean there were WMDs?
>
> You mean bin Laden talked with Saddam?
>
> Oh my.....
>
> My President got it right after all?
>
> It just can't get too much better than this...
>[/color]

Yawn, nice try. Still no link to 9/11 still no WMD. Old news. Any ties
with Al Quada
were broken off after 96. Iraq wad nothing to do with 9/11 they had no
WMDs and they were not in hoots with Al Quada. Come back when you have
real evidence.

What color is the sky in your world? There are numerous documents showing
Iraq had WMDS. The list of WMDS Iraq possessed was provided to the UN by
Saddam, as part of the ceasefire of the first Gulf war. I was Iraq failure
to account those WMDs that led to inspections and the numerous resolution
demanding Iraq get ride of them or account for them. Iraq did not comply.
To say they did not exist is ridicules in face of all the evidence to the
contrary. The real question should be where did the get to?

The President never said Iraq had anything to do with 9/11. What the
President did say was; We will track down those that attacked us and those
that support terrorist, and those that harbor terrorists. That is exactly
what he has doing sice 9/11, thank goodness, since Iraq supported and
harbored radial Islamic terrorist groups. Those that think bombing
Afghanistan ended the danger to us, from all of the various radial Islamic
terrorist groups, are worse than fools. Whether fools like you like it or
not, the President will continue to do what is need to protect you ass by
fighting all the radial Islamic terrorist groups.



mike hunt


"ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1143144359.362552.247640@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...[color=blue]
>
> Scott in Florida wrote:[color=green]
>> [url]http://abcnews.go.com/International/IraqCoverage/story?id=1734490&page=1[/url]
>>
>> Oh please tell me this isn't true....
>>
>> You mean there were WMDs?
>>
>> You mean bin Laden talked with Saddam?
>>
>> Oh my.....
>>
>> My President got it right after all?
>>
>> It just can't get too much better than this...
>>[/color]
>
> Yawn, nice try. Still no link to 9/11 still no WMD. Old news. Any ties
> with Al Quada
> were broken off after 96. Iraq wad nothing to do with 9/11 they had no
> WMDs and they were not in hoots with Al Quada. Come back when you have
> real evidence.
>[/color]

Scott in Florida wrote:[color=blue]
> [url]http://abcnews.go.com/International/IraqCoverage/story?id=1734490&page=1[/url][/color]
[color=blue]
> You mean bin Laden talked with Saddam?[/color]

And earlier, Dick Cheney talked to Saddam.
Logical conclusion: bin Laden and Cheney were behind 9/11.

Mike Hunter wrote:[color=blue]
> What color is the sky in your world? There are numerous documents showing
> Iraq had WMDS. The list of WMDS Iraq possessed was provided to the UN by
> Saddam, as part of the ceasefire of the first Gulf war.[/color]

"Had" chemical weapons, Hardly WMD, but since destroyed well
before the invasion.
[color=blue]
>I was Iraq failure
> to account those WMDs that led to inspections and the numerous resolution
> demanding Iraq get ride of them or account for them. Iraq did not comply.
> To say they did not exist is ridicules in face of all the evidence to the
> contrary. The real question should be where did the get to?
>[/color]

Except that Hans Blix said that the had no WMD, but the administration
chose to ignore that.

[color=blue]
> The President never said Iraq had anything to do with 9/11. What the
> President did say was; We will track down those that attacked us and those
> that support terrorist, and those that harbor terrorists. That is exactly
> what he has doing sice 9/11.[/color]

No terrorist bases in Iraq before 9/11. Terrorist bases in Iraq after
9/11.
Good work Bush.
[color=blue]
>, thank goodness, since Iraq supported and
> harbored radial Islamic terrorist groups.[/color]

No they didn't. You choose to belive this, but no evidence.
[color=blue]
> Those that think bombing
> Afghanistan ended the danger to us, from all of the various radial Islamic
> terrorist groups, are worse than fools.[/color]

Don't think that at all.
[color=blue]
> Whether fools like you like it or
> not, the President will continue to do what is need to protect you ass by
> fighting all the radial Islamic terrorist groups.
>[/color]

Too bad he created a bigger mess.
[color=blue]
>
>
> mike hunt
>
>[/color]

On 23 Mar 2006 13:47:12 -0800, "ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>"Had" chemical weapons, Hardly WMD, but since destroyed well
>before the invasion.[/color]

You DON'T know that!

He had them.

He was told to get rid of them and document that fact.

He did NOT.

We enforced the UN resolutions...

game, set, match!

--

Scott in Florida

On 23 Mar 2006 13:47:12 -0800, "ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>No terrorist bases in Iraq before 9/11[/color]

That is simply not true....

--

Scott in Florida

"Scott in Florida" <MoveOn@outa.here> wrote in message
news:48u5229g4dlksncmrbbi39qv532pltgloq@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> [url]http://abcnews.go.com/International/IraqCoverage/story?id=1734490&page=1[/url]
>
> Oh please tell me this isn't true....
>
> You mean there were WMDs?
>
> You mean bin Laden talked with Saddam?
>
> Oh my.....[/color]

You really should read past the headlines. The article confirms neither
assertion.
[color=blue]
> My President got it right after all?
>
> It just can't get too much better than this...
>
> --
>
> Scott in Florida[/color]


*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from [url]http://www.SecureIX.com[/url] ***

Scott in Florida wrote:[color=blue]
> On 23 Mar 2006 13:47:12 -0800, "ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
> >"Had" chemical weapons, Hardly WMD, but since destroyed well
> >before the invasion.[/color]
>
> You DON'T know that!
>
> He had them.[/color]

Hans Blix said different, and we couldn;t find any now could we.
[color=blue]
>
> He was told to get rid of them and document that fact.
>
> He did NOT.
>[/color]
Hans Blix said different, and we couldn;t find any now could we.
[color=blue]
> We enforced the UN resolutions...
>[/color]
He ignored the UN's weapons inspector.
[color=blue]
> game, set, match![/color]

You playing pocket pool?


[color=blue]
> --
>
> Scott in Florida[/color]

Scott in Florida wrote:[color=blue]
> On 23 Mar 2006 13:47:12 -0800, "ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
> >No terrorist bases in Iraq before 9/11[/color]
>
> That is simply not true....
>[/color]

Of course it is. Read the 9/11 report.

In article <1143150432.286671.124950@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
"ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Mike Hunter wrote:[color=green]
> > What color is the sky in your world? There are numerous documents showing
> > Iraq had WMDS. The list of WMDS Iraq possessed was provided to the UN by
> > Saddam, as part of the ceasefire of the first Gulf war.[/color]
>
> "Had" chemical weapons, Hardly WMD, but since destroyed well
> before the invasion.[/color]

TomH old boy, you'd be better off to spend time teaching learning rich
some manners. Mike has forgot more than you could ever teach him
regarding spelling, punctuation and history.

Once again your old saw about saddam not having wmd is weak, very weak.
We all know, except for you and a few of your followers that saddam
harbored terrorists, had and used on his own people WMD. You have lost
touch TomH or you just choose to carry on your stupid crusade.
--
"Welcome to President Clinton, Mrs. Clinton, and my fellow astronauts."

Al Gore

The BeenevOlent dbu wrote:[color=blue]
> In article <1143150432.286671.124950@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> "ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
> > Mike Hunter wrote:[color=darkred]
> > > What color is the sky in your world? There are numerous documents showing
> > > Iraq had WMDS. The list of WMDS Iraq possessed was provided to the UN by
> > > Saddam, as part of the ceasefire of the first Gulf war.[/color]
> >
> > "Had" chemical weapons, Hardly WMD, but since destroyed well
> > before the invasion.[/color]
>
> TomH old boy, you'd be better off to spend time teaching learning rich
> some manners. Mike has forgot more than you could ever teach him
> regarding spelling, punctuation and history.
>[/color]

I have now doubt that Mike has forgotten more than I could ever teach
him.
Do you read what you write :)
[color=blue]
> Once again your old saw about saddam not having wmd is weak, very weak.
> We all know, except for you and a few of your followers that saddam
> harbored terrorists, had and used on his own people WMD. You have lost
> touch TomH or you just choose to carry on your stupid crusade.[/color]

Expect you are the one making the claims without any evidence to
support your stance.

Norm De Plume wrote:[color=blue]
> Scott in Florida wrote:[color=green]
>> [url]http://abcnews.go.com/International/IraqCoverage/story?id=1734490&page=1[/url][/color]
>[color=green]
>> You mean bin Laden talked with Saddam?[/color]
>
> And earlier, Dick Cheney talked to Saddam.
> Logical conclusion: bin Laden and Cheney were behind 9/11.[/color]

Remember where you are ;)

On 23 Mar 2006 14:02:47 -0800, "ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Hans Blix said different, and we couldn;t find any now could we.[/color]

Hans Blix?

ROFLMAO

What did Saddam use on his own people? WMDs?

Yes he did use them.

He did not get rid of them.

He did not report that he had as required.

--

Scott in Florida