OT Bush Springs A Leak; Prays Dems Don't Take The Hill Back

George W. Bush authorized the leaking of classified information to
silence a truth-teller about his wicked lies and distortions which have
since led to the deaths of thousands of Iraqis and American soldiers.

We'll subpeona his ass. You can believe that.

That is one view, little richard AKA dick However we would expect that from
you but several legal scholars, who know better, have said the President and
the VP have the Constitutional authority to declassify information. That is
what was done to show how his distracters were wrong, again, not laws were
broken. The British governments still supports the President position on the
situation ;)


mike hunt


"Little richard AKA dick" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1144401271.528592.72600@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...[color=blue]
> George W. Bush authorized the leaking of classified information to
> silence a truth-teller about his wicked lies and distortions which have
> since led to the deaths of thousands of Iraqis and American soldiers.
>
> We'll subpeona his ass. You can believe that.
>[/color]

Mike Hunter wrote:[color=blue]
> That is one view, little richard AKA dick However we would expect that from
> you but several legal scholars, who know better, have said the President and
> the VP have the Constitutional authority to declassify information.[/color]

Not for malicious intent, dumbass. That is precisely what "High Crimes
and Misdemeanors" means.
[color=blue]
> That is
> what was done to show how his distracters were wrong, again, not laws were
> broken. The British governments still supports the President position on the
> situation ;)[/color]

Do us a favor and move to england then, you moron.
[color=blue]
>
>
> mike hunt
>
>
> "Little richard AKA dick" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1144401271.528592.72600@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...[color=green]
> > George W. Bush authorized the leaking of classified information to
> > silence a truth-teller about his wicked lies and distortions which have
> > since led to the deaths of thousands of Iraqis and American soldiers.
> >
> > We'll subpeona his ass. You can believe that.
> >[/color][/color]

In article <1144424447.244403.216650@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
"Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Mike Hunter wrote:[color=green]
> > That is one view, little richard AKA dick However we would expect that from
> > you but several legal scholars, who know better, have said the President and
> > the VP have the Constitutional authority to declassify information.[/color]
>
> Not for malicious intent, dumbass. That is precisely what "High Crimes
> and Misdemeanors" means.
>[color=green]
> > That is
> > what was done to show how his distracters were wrong, again, not laws were
> > broken. The British governments still supports the President position on the
> > situation ;)[/color]
>
> Do us a favor and move to england then, you moron.
>[color=green]
> >
> >
> > mike hunt
> >
> >
> > "Little richard AKA dick" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:1144401271.528592.72600@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...[color=darkred]
> > > George W. Bush authorized the leaking of classified information to
> > > silence a truth-teller about his wicked lies and distortions which have
> > > since led to the deaths of thousands of Iraqis and American soldiers.
> > >
> > > We'll subpeona his ass. You can believe that.
> > >[/color][/color][/color]

Mike, you should feel honored when professor rich calls you derogatory
names, it means you have him on the defensive and backed in a corner
like a scared little mouse.
--
"A low voter turnout is an indication of fewer people going to the polls."

-- Vice President Al Gore

We all know that LOL

mike hunt


"The Benev0lent dbu" <relaxan.d@smeltherose.comm> wrote in message
news:relaxan.d-6F6040.12290507042006@news-rdr-03.rdc-kc.rr.com...[color=blue]
> In article <1144424447.244403.216650@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> "Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Mike Hunter wrote:[color=darkred]
>> > That is one view, little richard AKA dick However we would expect that
>> > from
>> > you but several legal scholars, who know better, have said the
>> > President and
>> > the VP have the Constitutional authority to declassify information.[/color]
>>
>> Not for malicious intent, dumbass. That is precisely what "High Crimes
>> and Misdemeanors" means.
>>[color=darkred]
>> > That is
>> > what was done to show how his distracters were wrong, again, not laws
>> > were
>> > broken. The British governments still supports the President position
>> > on the
>> > situation ;)[/color]
>>
>> Do us a favor and move to england then, you moron.
>>[color=darkred]
>> >
>> >
>> > mike hunt
>> >
>> >
>> > "Little richard AKA dick" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> > news:1144401271.528592.72600@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
>> > > George W. Bush authorized the leaking of classified information to
>> > > silence a truth-teller about his wicked lies and distortions which
>> > > have
>> > > since led to the deaths of thousands of Iraqis and American soldiers.
>> > >
>> > > We'll subpeona his ass. You can believe that.
>> > >[/color][/color]
>
> Mike, you should feel honored when professor rich calls you derogatory
> names, it means you have him on the defensive and backed in a corner
> like a scared little mouse.
> --
> "A low voter turnout is an indication of fewer people going to the polls."
>
> -- Vice President Al Gore[/color]

>That is precisely what "High Crimes[color=blue]
>and Misdemeanors" means.[/color]

I always getta chuckle out of the "impeach Bush" crowd. They seem to
forget that William Jefferson Clinton WAS Impeached by vote of Senate.
Anyone remember that?

Anyone remember the "controlling legal authority" talking point??
Seems that yes, he was impeached, but cuz there was no 'controlling
legal authority' WHO was gonna make him step down? You?? so he
stayed. All completely "Constitutional" as it doesn't really say
otherwise, now does it?

So use up all your time, money, and energy to 'impeach' Bush and see
what it gets ya. That part of the Constitution -- along a with a great
many others -- was laid to rags years ago and trampled. Oh, but wait,
THIS time it'll be all "different"??

"Busy their giddy minds with foreign entanglements" -- William
Shakespeare

"Meet the new boss -- same as the old boss..." -- P. Townsend

Larry

You are a bit confused Larry. The House 'impeaches' for high (serious)
crimes and misdemeanors (minor crimes) The Senate hears the charges and
has the power to remove a President (or other elected officials) but it
takes the votes of 60 Senators. There was not 60 votes to remove Clinton.

The Dimocrates are holding up much of the meaningful spending legislation
coming from the House, in the same manner, because the Republicans have only
55 votes. Whenever a piece of legislation comes up that they do not like
they threaten to filibuster (debate forever) to stop all work of the Senate.
It take 60 votes to end debate so the Republican leadership can not bring
the legislation to the floor. They have been doing it ever since the lost
control of both houses then blame the Republican when nothing get done, like
spending cuts


mike hunt




"larry" <larry.a.schurr@boeing.com> wrote in message
news:1144443020.821176.280650@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...[color=blue][color=green]
> >That is precisely what "High Crimes
>>and Misdemeanors" means.[/color]
>
> I always getta chuckle out of the "impeach Bush" crowd. They seem to
> forget that William Jefferson Clinton WAS Impeached by vote of Senate.
> Anyone remember that?
>
> Anyone remember the "controlling legal authority" talking point??
> Seems that yes, he was impeached, but cuz there was no 'controlling
> legal authority' WHO was gonna make him step down? You?? so he
> stayed. All completely "Constitutional" as it doesn't really say
> otherwise, now does it?
>
> So use up all your time, money, and energy to 'impeach' Bush and see
> what it gets ya. That part of the Constitution -- along a with a great
> many others -- was laid to rags years ago and trampled. Oh, but wait,
> THIS time it'll be all "different"??
>
> "Busy their giddy minds with foreign entanglements" -- William
> Shakespeare
>
> "Meet the new boss -- same as the old boss..." -- P. Townsend
>
> Larry
>[/color]

Mike Hunter wrote:[color=blue]
> We all know that LOL
>
> mike hunt
>
>
> "The Benev0lent dbu" <relaxan.d@smeltherose.comm> wrote in message
> news:relaxan.d-6F6040.12290507042006@news-rdr-03.rdc-kc.rr.com...[color=green]
> > In article <1144424447.244403.216650@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> > "Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >> Mike Hunter wrote:
> >> > That is one view, little richard AKA dick However we would expect that
> >> > from
> >> > you but several legal scholars, who know better, have said the
> >> > President and
> >> > the VP have the Constitutional authority to declassify information.
> >>
> >> Not for malicious intent, dumbass. That is precisely what "High Crimes
> >> and Misdemeanors" means.
> >>
> >> > That is
> >> > what was done to show how his distracters were wrong, again, not laws
> >> > were
> >> > broken. The British governments still supports the President position
> >> > on the
> >> > situation ;)
> >>
> >> Do us a favor and move to england then, you moron.
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > mike hunt
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "Little richard AKA dick" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> > news:1144401271.528592.72600@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
> >> > > George W. Bush authorized the leaking of classified information to
> >> > > silence a truth-teller about his wicked lies and distortions which
> >> > > have
> >> > > since led to the deaths of thousands of Iraqis and American soldiers.
> >> > >
> >> > > We'll subpeona his ass. You can believe that.
> >> > >[/color]
> >
> > Mike, you should feel honored when professor rich calls you derogatory
> > names, it means you have him on the defensive and backed in a corner
> > like a scared little mouse.[/color][/color]

Scared of what? A fat 16 year old kid who whacks off on his greasy
father's pc in the garage and spews hateful racist rhetoric?

You're not only stupid, you're crazy, duh-bu. The more you post, the
dumber you look.

Oh, and by the way, I archive all of your messages forever.

In article <1144488393.448542.319580@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:

[color=blue]
> Scared of what? A fat 16 year old kid who whacks off on his greasy
> father's pc in the garage and spews hateful racist rhetoric?
>
> You're not only stupid, you're crazy, duh-bu. The more you post, the
> dumber you look.
>
> Oh, and by the way, I archive all of your messages forever.[/color]

Is that what you are, a fat 16 year old kid?

professor rich, you are funny.
--
"A low voter turnout is an indication of fewer people going to the polls."

-- Vice President Al Gore

The Benev0lent dbu wrote:[color=blue]
> In article <1144488393.448542.319580@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> "Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>[color=green]
> > Scared of what? A fat 16 year old kid who whacks off on his greasy
> > father's pc in the garage and spews hateful racist rhetoric?
> >
> > You're not only stupid, you're crazy, duh-bu. The more you post, the
> > dumber you look.
> >
> > Oh, and by the way, I archive all of your messages forever.[/color]
>
> Is that what you are, a fat 16 year old kid?[/color]

Actually, I lost 50 lbs in 2005.... I put on 50 lbs in 2004. Insane.
All work and food, no sleep.

I'm keeping it off, too.
[color=blue]
>
> professor rich, you are funny.[/color]

Isn't it nice how we can get up from our computers and walk outside?

Plenty of red buds on the azaleas this spring...

larry wrote:[color=blue][color=green]
> >That is precisely what "High Crimes
> >and Misdemeanors" means.[/color]
>
> I always getta chuckle out of the "impeach Bush" crowd. They seem to
> forget that William Jefferson Clinton WAS Impeached by vote of Senate.
> Anyone remember that?[/color]

I forgot.
[color=blue]
>
> Anyone remember the "controlling legal authority" talking point??
> Seems that yes, he was impeached, but cuz there was no 'controlling
> legal authority' WHO was gonna make him step down? You?? so he[/color]

He was bulletproof.
[color=blue]
> stayed. All completely "Constitutional" as it doesn't really say
> otherwise, now does it?[/color]

Does it? Doesn't it? That is the question.
[color=blue]
>
> So use up all your time, money, and energy to 'impeach' Bush and see[/color]

Its not my buck that stops there. And in the White House, the buck
doesn't stop ANYWHERE.
[color=blue]
> what it gets ya. That part of the Constitution -- along a with a great
> many others -- was laid to rags years ago and trampled. Oh, but wait,[/color]

Whodunit?
[color=blue]
> THIS time it'll be all "different"??[/color]

Yes.
[color=blue]
>
> "Busy their giddy minds with foreign entanglements" -- William
> Shakespeare[/color]

Like Iraq?
[color=blue]
>
> "Meet the new boss -- same as the old boss..." -- P. Townsend[/color]

What are you trying to say, Lawrence?
[color=blue]
>
> Larry[/color]

Harry