Re: OT - retired CIA officer accuses White House of ignoring good intelligence

What does this have to do with cars in general or Toyotas
in particular?

If you knew it was off topic, then why post it here?



Geoff

--
"Soon, nearly everyone in the room was announcing that no existing
group adequately reflected their identity, and they needed to be
in a group of one. It was like a capsule history of the American
Left." -- East Bay Express

Maybe you should learn what OT means or invent your own group that you can
monitor for real.


"Geoff Miller" <geoffm@u1.netgate.net> wrote in message
news:e2iqj9$qd3@u1.netgate.net...[color=blue]
>
>
> What does this have to do with cars in general or Toyotas
> in particular?
>
> If you knew it was off topic, then why post it here?
>
>
>
> Geoff
>
> --
> "Soon, nearly everyone in the room was announcing that no existing
> group adequately reflected their identity, and they needed to be
> in a group of one. It was like a capsule history of the American
> Left." -- East Bay Express[/color]

Earlier I asked (reasonably enough, I thought):

: What does this have to do with cars in general or Toyotas
: in particular?

: If you knew it was off topic, then why post it here?


Art <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> replies:
[color=blue]
> Maybe you should learn what OT means or invent your own group
> that you can monitor for real.[/color]


Nice attempt at diversion. You didn't answer my questions.

If "OT" doesn't mean "off topic," then what _does_ it mean, Sparky?

And what does the idea of starting and monitoring my own group have
to do with the topicality of the post that started off this thread?

Apparently you weren't brought up very well. If you can't defend
your actions, then cut your losses, be a man and apologize. Getting
belligerent with the person who called you on your misbehavior only
compounds your offense and makes you look worse.



Geoff

--
"Round noses were good enough for Lee Harvey Oswald,
they're good enough for me." -- Rich McAllister

>by "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> Apr 24, 2006 at 04:06 AM[color=blue]
>
>
>Intelligence indicated no WMD's but Bush did not want to hear it.
>
>[url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/04/23/cia.iraq/index.html[/url]
>
>[/color]
Ever notice how all the MSM phony hit-peices always leave out some facts?
Like the BIO Trailers a while back? A team said they were not Biolabs.
Bush was TOLD. Bush BAD.
Come to find out there were 3 Teams and only a percentage of one of the
teams thought they were not Biolabs.

Never a retraction, correction or clarification.
But how many people excepted it as fact and were made to doubt Bush?
That's the WHOLE IDEA IMO.

Now we have another one.
Sabri told the CIA Hussein had no active WMDs. Bush bad.
Well, Here's what they left out:
Sabri ALSO told the CIA Hussein desperately WANTED a Nuke but it would
take more than a year.
Sabri ALSO told the CIA Hussein had stockpiled chemical weapons.
Sabri ALSO told the CIA Hussein had poison gas left over from the first
Gulf War.

This actually REINFORCES the argument for going to war.

[url]http://msnbc.msn.com/id/11927856/[/url]

It's not Bush who lies. It's the MSM, Democrats and Leftwing bloggers!

-hbuck

Ever notice how rightwingers don't tell the full truth about the links they
post!


"hbuck" <hbuck@nadaspam.breakthru.com> wrote in message
news:5c46803d316ee383bf2605de3131574a@localhost.talkaboutautos.com...[color=blue][color=green]
> >by "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> Apr 24, 2006 at 04:06 AM
>>
>>
>>Intelligence indicated no WMD's but Bush did not want to hear it.
>>
>>[url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/04/23/cia.iraq/index.html[/url]
>>
>>[/color]
> Ever notice how all the MSM phony hit-peices always leave out some facts?
> Like the BIO Trailers a while back? A team said they were not Biolabs.
> Bush was TOLD. Bush BAD.
> Come to find out there were 3 Teams and only a percentage of one of the
> teams thought they were not Biolabs.
>
> Never a retraction, correction or clarification.
> But how many people excepted it as fact and were made to doubt Bush?
> That's the WHOLE IDEA IMO.
>
> Now we have another one.
> Sabri told the CIA Hussein had no active WMDs. Bush bad.
> Well, Here's what they left out:
> Sabri ALSO told the CIA Hussein desperately WANTED a Nuke but it would
> take more than a year.
> Sabri ALSO told the CIA Hussein had stockpiled chemical weapons.
> Sabri ALSO told the CIA Hussein had poison gas left over from the first
> Gulf War.
>
> This actually REINFORCES the argument for going to war.
>
> [url]http://msnbc.msn.com/id/11927856/[/url]
>
> It's not Bush who lies. It's the MSM, Democrats and Leftwing bloggers!
>
> -hbuck
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>[/color]

>by "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> Apr 26, 2006 at 01:47 PM[color=blue]
>
>
>Ever notice how rightwingers don't tell the full truth about the links[/color]
they[color=blue]
>
>post!
>
>
>[/color]
Can you be more specific?

-hbuck

How many of your so-called facts were backed up by your link?


"hbuck" <hbuck@nadaspam.breakthru.com> wrote in message
news:34d43ed76ceb5f03df7adcc546c4bb10@localhost.talkaboutautos.com...[color=blue][color=green]
> >by "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> Apr 26, 2006 at 01:47 PM
>>
>>
>>Ever notice how rightwingers don't tell the full truth about the links[/color]
> they[color=green]
>>
>>post!
>>
>>
>>[/color]
> Can you be more specific?
>
> -hbuck
>
>
>[/color]

[color=blue]
>by "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> Apr 27, 2006 at 10:38 PM
>
>
>How many of your so-called facts were backed up by your link?
>
>
>
>[/color]
I don't know what you're gettin at.

-hbuck