OT - Bush hits new low

[url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/24/bush.poll/index.html[/url]

Art <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> writes:
[color=blue]
> [url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/24/bush.poll/index.html[/url][/color]


Does Bush drive a Toyota? No? Then why was this posted to a
newsgroup that exists for the discussion of Toyota automobiles?
There's certainly no shortage of political newsgroups out there.

(Ever notice that it's almost always the Bush-hating leftist
shitheads who post off-topic political rants to newsgroups?
They just can't contain themselves, or at least direct their
cognitive cockslobber to appropriate forums. It's reminiscent
of how they're so infatuated with bumper stickers: Everybody
has a right to *their* opinion.)

You owe the readership an apology, Art. Now get to it.




Geoff

--
"Round noses were good enough for Lee Harvey Oswald,
they're good enough for me." -- Rich McAllister

"Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:Vjb3g.12333$i41.8745@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...[color=blue]
> [url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/24/bush.poll/index.html[/url]
>[/color]

After three days of non stop rain and water seeping into my basement I can't
take any more bad news.
mark_

As far as I know he does not drive a Toyota, the President drives a horse, a
bicycle or a Ford F250 HD V8 diesel crewcab. ;)

mike hunt


Geoff Miller" <geoffm@u1.netgate.net> wrote in message
news:e2l94r$83o@u1.netgate.net...[color=blue]
>
>
> Art <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> writes:
>[color=green]
>> [url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/24/bush.poll/index.html[/url][/color]
>
>
> Does Bush drive a Toyota? No? Then why was this posted to a
> newsgroup that exists for the discussion of Toyota automobiles?
> There's certainly no shortage of political newsgroups out there.
>
> (Ever notice that it's almost always the Bush-hating leftist
> shitheads who post off-topic political rants to newsgroups?
> They just can't contain themselves, or at least direct their
> cognitive cockslobber to appropriate forums. It's reminiscent
> of how they're so infatuated with bumper stickers: Everybody
> has a right to *their* opinion.)
>
> You owe the readership an apology, Art. Now get to it.
>
>
>
>
> Geoff
>
> --
> "Round noses were good enough for Lee Harvey Oswald,
> they're good enough for me." -- Rich McAllister
>[/color]

>by "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> Apr 24, 2006 at 09:21 PM[color=blue]
>
>
>[url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/24/bush.poll/index.html[/url]
>
>
>[/color]

Approximately 75-80% of the people say they get their News from the MSM.
The MSM downplays the Economy and the War, never give Bush credit for
anything. So you have 75% of the people not truly informed. Hence the low
ratings. But they are IMO artificial.

-hbuck

hbuck wrote:[color=blue][color=green]
> >by "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> Apr 24, 2006 at 09:21 PM
> >
> >
> >[url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/24/bush.poll/index.html[/url]
> >
> >
> >[/color]
>
> Approximately 75-80% of the people say they get their News from the MSM.
> The MSM downplays the Economy and the War, never give Bush credit for
> anything. So you have 75% of the people not truly informed. Hence the low
> ratings. But they are IMO artificial.[/color]

As is your reasoning.

>by "ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> Apr 26, 2006 at 10:21 AM[color=blue]
>
>
>hbuck wrote:[color=green][color=darkred]
>> >by "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> Apr 24, 2006 at 09:21 PM
>> >
>> >
>> >[url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/24/bush.poll/index.html[/url]
>> >
>> >
>> >[/color]
>>
>> Approximately 75-80% of the people say they get their News from the[/color][/color]
MSM.[color=blue][color=green]
>> The MSM downplays the Economy and the War, never give Bush credit for
>> anything. So you have 75% of the people not truly informed. Hence the[/color]
>low[color=green]
>> ratings. But they are IMO artificial.[/color]
>
>As is your reasoning.
>
>
>[/color]
This coming from a guy who says we aren't fighting Al Qaeda in Iraq and
the released Iraqi documents are "fake news".

-hbuck

hbuck wrote:[color=blue][color=green]
> >by "ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> Apr 26, 2006 at 10:21 AM
> >
> >
> >hbuck wrote:[color=darkred]
> >> >by "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> Apr 24, 2006 at 09:21 PM
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >[url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/24/bush.poll/index.html[/url]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> Approximately 75-80% of the people say they get their News from the[/color][/color]
> MSM.[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> The MSM downplays the Economy and the War, never give Bush credit for
> >> anything. So you have 75% of the people not truly informed. Hence the[/color]
> >low[color=darkred]
> >> ratings. But they are IMO artificial.[/color]
> >
> >As is your reasoning.
> >
> >
> >[/color]
> This coming from a guy who says we aren't fighting Al Qaeda in Iraq and
> the released Iraqi documents are "fake news".
>[/color]

That's not what I said. I said Iraq had nothing to do with Terrorism.
It's a fact that Al Qaeda has recruited insurgents after the invasion.
These are mostly "Newly recruited" terrorists. Even the largest figures
from the white house for Non Iraqi insurgents is < 10 % that means that
the insurgents are made up over 90% Iraqi nationals. To say we are
fighting the terrorists in Iraq is ridiculous.

As for the "Fake news", unverified second hand and already discounted
news is hardly
"real"



[color=blue]
> -hbuck[/color]

In article <1146176201.207604.169680@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
"ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> hbuck wrote:[color=green][color=darkred]
> > >by "ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> Apr 26, 2006 at 10:21 AM
> > >
> > >
> > >hbuck wrote:
> > >> >by "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> Apr 24, 2006 at 09:21 PM
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >[url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/24/bush.poll/index.html[/url]
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> Approximately 75-80% of the people say they get their News from the[/color]
> > MSM.[color=darkred]
> > >> The MSM downplays the Economy and the War, never give Bush credit for
> > >> anything. So you have 75% of the people not truly informed. Hence the
> > >low
> > >> ratings. But they are IMO artificial.
> > >
> > >As is your reasoning.
> > >
> > >
> > >[/color]
> > This coming from a guy who says we aren't fighting Al Qaeda in Iraq and
> > the released Iraqi documents are "fake news".
> >[/color]
>
> That's not what I said. I said Iraq had nothing to do with Terrorism.
> It's a fact that Al Qaeda has recruited insurgents after the invasion.
> These are mostly "Newly recruited" terrorists. Even the largest figures
> from the white house for Non Iraqi insurgents is < 10 % that means that
> the insurgents are made up over 90% Iraqi nationals. To say we are
> fighting the terrorists in Iraq is ridiculous.
>
> As for the "Fake news", unverified second hand and already discounted
> news is hardly
> "real"
>
>
>
>[color=green]
> > -hbuck[/color][/color]

Ol tom keeps repeating the same old crap over and over again. Iraq was,
until GWB and the U.S.A. put a stop to it, a hotbed of terrorists. The
biggest one lived there until saddam had him bumped off because he was
getting too powerful and threatened saddam. Saddam was paying bombers
to blow up buses in Israel and had and used WMD, even on his own people.
Saddam also tried to build a delivery system for advanced weapons. Why
do we have to keep repeating this stuff for old tom, are you losing your
memory and your marbles or just not paying attention.
--
"[It's] time for the human race to enter the solar system."

-- Vice President Al Gore

The BENevolent dbu wrote:[color=blue]
> In article <1146176201.207604.169680@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
> "ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
> > hbuck wrote:[color=darkred]
> > > >by "ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> Apr 26, 2006 at 10:21 AM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >hbuck wrote:
> > > >> >by "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> Apr 24, 2006 at 09:21 PM
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >[url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/24/bush.poll/index.html[/url]
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >> Approximately 75-80% of the people say they get their News from the
> > > MSM.
> > > >> The MSM downplays the Economy and the War, never give Bush credit for
> > > >> anything. So you have 75% of the people not truly informed. Hence the
> > > >low
> > > >> ratings. But they are IMO artificial.
> > > >
> > > >As is your reasoning.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > This coming from a guy who says we aren't fighting Al Qaeda in Iraq and
> > > the released Iraqi documents are "fake news".
> > >[/color]
> >
> > That's not what I said. I said Iraq had nothing to do with Terrorism.
> > It's a fact that Al Qaeda has recruited insurgents after the invasion.
> > These are mostly "Newly recruited" terrorists. Even the largest figures
> > from the white house for Non Iraqi insurgents is < 10 % that means that
> > the insurgents are made up over 90% Iraqi nationals. To say we are
> > fighting the terrorists in Iraq is ridiculous.
> >
> > As for the "Fake news", unverified second hand and already discounted
> > news is hardly
> > "real"
> >
> >
> >
> >[color=darkred]
> > > -hbuck[/color][/color]
>
> Ol tom keeps repeating the same old crap over and over again. Iraq was,
> until GWB and the U.S.A. put a stop to it, a hotbed of terrorists. The
> biggest one lived there until saddam had him bumped off because he was
> getting too powerful and threatened saddam. Saddam was paying bombers
> to blow up buses in Israel and had and used WMD, even on his own people.
> Saddam also tried to build a delivery system for advanced weapons. Why
> do we have to keep repeating this stuff for old tom, are you losing your
> memory and your marbles or just not paying attention.
> --[/color]
Glug glug glug glug.
Expect that this nonsense you are spewing has been disproved a long
time ago. Even the White house knows this is not true. Too bad
dumbasses like yourself still believe this crap. The only reason that
has some truth is that Saddam used WMD (and I use that term loosly) on
his own people. So what! like that's the reason we went to war, get
real. There are far worse dicators, who we've had no problem
ingnoring, than Saddam.
Pay attention. Saddam had no WMD. None, nada , zilch. Saddam had
nothing to do with 9/11 or Al Qaeda.

In article <1146177797.730229.287270@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> The BENevolent dbu wrote:[color=green]
> > In article <1146176201.207604.169680@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
> > "ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> > > hbuck wrote:
> > > > >by "ToMh" <tlhumm@hotmail.com> Apr 26, 2006 at 10:21 AM
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >hbuck wrote:
> > > > >> >by "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> Apr 24, 2006 at 09:21
> > > > >> >PM
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >[url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/24/bush.poll/index.html[/url]
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Approximately 75-80% of the people say they get their News from the
> > > > MSM.
> > > > >> The MSM downplays the Economy and the War, never give Bush credit
> > > > >> for
> > > > >> anything. So you have 75% of the people not truly informed. Hence
> > > > >> the
> > > > >low
> > > > >> ratings. But they are IMO artificial.
> > > > >
> > > > >As is your reasoning.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > This coming from a guy who says we aren't fighting Al Qaeda in Iraq and
> > > > the released Iraqi documents are "fake news".
> > > >
> > >
> > > That's not what I said. I said Iraq had nothing to do with Terrorism.
> > > It's a fact that Al Qaeda has recruited insurgents after the invasion.
> > > These are mostly "Newly recruited" terrorists. Even the largest figures
> > > from the white house for Non Iraqi insurgents is < 10 % that means that
> > > the insurgents are made up over 90% Iraqi nationals. To say we are
> > > fighting the terrorists in Iraq is ridiculous.
> > >
> > > As for the "Fake news", unverified second hand and already discounted
> > > news is hardly
> > > "real"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -hbuck[/color]
> >
> > Ol tom keeps repeating the same old crap over and over again. Iraq was,
> > until GWB and the U.S.A. put a stop to it, a hotbed of terrorists. The
> > biggest one lived there until saddam had him bumped off because he was
> > getting too powerful and threatened saddam. Saddam was paying bombers
> > to blow up buses in Israel and had and used WMD, even on his own people.
> > Saddam also tried to build a delivery system for advanced weapons. Why
> > do we have to keep repeating this stuff for old tom, are you losing your
> > memory and your marbles or just not paying attention.
> > --[/color]
> Glug glug glug glug.
> Expect that this nonsense you are spewing has been disproved a long
> time ago. Even the White house knows this is not true. Too bad
> dumbasses like yourself still believe this crap. The only reason that
> has some truth is that Saddam used WMD (and I use that term loosly) on
> his own people. So what! like that's the reason we went to war, get
> real. There are far worse dicators, who we've had no problem
> ingnoring, than Saddam.
> Pay attention. Saddam had no WMD. None, nada , zilch. Saddam had
> nothing to do with 9/11 or Al Qaeda.[/color]

tom old boy you have oldtimers disease. It's not funny.
--
"[It's] time for the human race to enter the solar system."

-- Vice President Al Gore