OT - why so many OTs in this place?

why.

In article <q128529hoqj8o9rebu03rd7p654co7000q@4ax.com>,
joe <nospam@invalid.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> why.[/color]

Doesn't matter. Just killfile the authors.

"joe" <nospam@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:q128529hoqj8o9rebu03rd7p654co7000q@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> why.[/color]

Automated response to most recent OT complaint:

1. You can use your killfile to avoid most who do the most OT posting.
2. Our cars are so trouble-free that there is very little to discuss most
of the time.
3. Instead of complaining, you should post a question or comment that *is*
on-topic. Most will chime in and help if they can.
4. You have just created an OT post yourself.

Natalie

There were certain right wing Toyota owners who insisted on posting
political messages here. Moderate and liberals would not let them go
unanswered. Ironically, the most prolific poster, Scott, hasn't posted any
of his right wing propaganda here for a while.



"joe" <nospam@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:q128529hoqj8o9rebu03rd7p654co7000q@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> why.[/color]

Art, 4/30/2006,12:33:44 AM, wrote:
[color=blue]
> There were certain right wing Toyota owners who insisted on posting
> political messages here.[/color]

You are not a Toyota owner anymore. Why do you continue to post here?
[color=blue]
> Moderate and liberals would not let them go
> unanswered.[/color]

Moderates by definition don't care one way or the other. It is you
Liberals who propogated the OT posts. That is why I could not let them
go unanswered anymore.
[color=blue]
> Ironically, the most prolific poster, Scott, hasn't
> posted any of his right wing propaganda here for a while.[/color]

That may be because everything is under control.

--
"I do not belong to any organised political party: I'm a democrat." ~
Will Rogers

On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 04:33:44 +0000, Art wrote:
[color=blue]
> There were certain right wing Toyota owners who insisted on posting
> political messages here. Moderate and liberals would not let them go
> unanswered. Ironically, the most prolific poster, Scott, hasn't posted any
> of his right wing propaganda here for a while.[/color]

And there are certain Liberal Honda owners that just can't let things go! ;)

[color=blue]
>
>
>
> "joe" <nospam@invalid.com> wrote in message
> news:q128529hoqj8o9rebu03rd7p654co7000q@4ax.com...[color=green]
>> why.[/color][/color]

On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:54:54 +0000, badgolferman wrote:
[color=blue]
> Art, 4/30/2006,12:33:44 AM, wrote:
>[color=green]
>> There were certain right wing Toyota owners who insisted on posting
>> political messages here.[/color]
>
> You are not a Toyota owner anymore. Why do you continue to post here?[/color]

What would we do without Art and Little Richard?

"Hachiroku" <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote in message
news:HZ15g.4591$Mn6.2142@trndny06...[color=blue]
> On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:54:54 +0000, badgolferman wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Art, 4/30/2006,12:33:44 AM, wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> There were certain right wing Toyota owners who insisted on posting
>>> political messages here.[/color]
>>
>> You are not a Toyota owner anymore. Why do you continue to post here?[/color]
>
> What would we do without Art and Little Richard?
>[/color]

And Dizziot, don't forget Dizziot.

Ever notice how when the LIEberals are losing ground, they sling mud and
lose still more ground. But since they have no real facts to offer . . . .

Charles of Schaumburg

Charles of Schaumburg.

In article <HZ15g.4591$Mn6.2142@trndny06>, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS>
wrote:
[color=blue]
> On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:54:54 +0000, badgolferman wrote:
>[color=green]
> > Art, 4/30/2006,12:33:44 AM, wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >> There were certain right wing Toyota owners who insisted on posting
> >> political messages here.[/color]
> >
> > You are not a Toyota owner anymore. Why do you continue to post here?[/color]
>
> What would we do without Art and Little Richard?[/color]

I have 43 authors killfiled.

It makes this newsgroup on-topic. What a concept.

"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in message
news:elmop-2D7BA1.10432730042006@nntp1.usenetserver.com...[color=blue]
> In article <HZ15g.4591$Mn6.2142@trndny06>, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS>
> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:54:54 +0000, badgolferman wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> > Art, 4/30/2006,12:33:44 AM, wrote:
>> >
>> >> There were certain right wing Toyota owners who insisted on posting
>> >> political messages here.
>> >
>> > You are not a Toyota owner anymore. Why do you continue to post here?[/color]
>>
>> What would we do without Art and Little Richard?[/color]
>
> I have 43 authors killfiled.
>
> It makes this newsgroup on-topic. What a concept.
>[/color]

1. Left or Right wing?

2. Toyotas are generally so reliable, we often haven't much to complain
about.

Charles of Schaumburg

220,000 miles and still going.

"Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:I6X4g.11641$Es3.1919@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...[color=blue]
> There were certain right wing Toyota owners who insisted on posting
> political messages here. Moderate and liberals would not let them go
> unanswered. Ironically, the most prolific poster, Scott, hasn't posted
> any of his right wing propaganda here for a while.
>
>[/color]
Actually, it's cuz he's on vacation, as I was this past week.

Natalie[color=blue]
>
> "joe" <nospam@invalid.com> wrote in message
> news:q128529hoqj8o9rebu03rd7p654co7000q@4ax.com...[color=green]
>> why.[/color]
>
>[/color]

"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in message
news:elmop-2D7BA1.10432730042006@nntp1.usenetserver.com...[color=blue]
> In article <HZ15g.4591$Mn6.2142@trndny06>, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.GTS>
> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:54:54 +0000, badgolferman wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> > Art, 4/30/2006,12:33:44 AM, wrote:
>> >
>> >> There were certain right wing Toyota owners who insisted on posting
>> >> political messages here.
>> >
>> > You are not a Toyota owner anymore. Why do you continue to post here?[/color]
>>
>> What would we do without Art and Little Richard?[/color]
>
> I have 43 authors killfiled.
>
> It makes this newsgroup on-topic. What a concept.
>[/color]

Are there even 43 regular posters here? You must read about 3 posts per
day.

Natalie

In article <CvOdnZAvxu-TTMnZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>
[email]n5hsr@comcast.net[/email] "n5hsr" writes:
[color=blue]
> 1. Left or Right wing?[/color]

[OT] of [OT]...

In the UK we drive on the Left. Doing that here is Right. So if
you drive on the Right in the UK, you're Wrong. In several other
countries people drive on the Right, which for them is Right On,
unless they are _meant_ to drive on the Left. Which side is used
can be a Left-over of a UK connection (eg, former Commonwealth)
but need not be (eg, Japan -- though possibly they caught it from
us Brits, seeing it as a sensible Rite). Choice of side to drive
on surely is one of the Rights of any free country, though not of
individuals within it: if choice of side were Left to each one of
us, we'd quickly be in a Right Mess. And some nutters could take
our choice as a political statement... Maybe we should all drive
down the Centre?

One day we can discuss the Rules of Cricket.
--
Andrew Stephenson

"Andrew Stephenson" <ames@deltrak.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1146419531snz@deltrak.demon.co.uk...[color=blue]
> In article <CvOdnZAvxu-TTMnZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>
> [email]n5hsr@comcast.net[/email] "n5hsr" writes:
>[color=green]
>> 1. Left or Right wing?[/color]
>
> [OT] of [OT]...
>
> In the UK we drive on the Left. Doing that here is Right. So if
> you drive on the Right in the UK, you're Wrong. In several other
> countries people drive on the Right, which for them is Right On,
> unless they are _meant_ to drive on the Left. Which side is used
> can be a Left-over of a UK connection (eg, former Commonwealth)
> but need not be (eg, Japan -- though possibly they caught it from
> us Brits, seeing it as a sensible Rite). Choice of side to drive
> on surely is one of the Rights of any free country, though not of
> individuals within it: if choice of side were Left to each one of
> us, we'd quickly be in a Right Mess. And some nutters could take
> our choice as a political statement... Maybe we should all drive
> down the Centre?
>
> One day we can discuss the Rules of Cricket.
> --
> Andrew Stephenson
>[/color]

LOL you nut

Natalie

"Andrew Stephenson" <ames@deltrak.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1146419531snz@deltrak.demon.co.uk...[color=blue]
> In article <CvOdnZAvxu-TTMnZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com>
> [email]n5hsr@comcast.net[/email] "n5hsr" writes:
>[color=green]
>> 1. Left or Right wing?[/color]
>
> [OT] of [OT]...
>
> In the UK we drive on the Left. Doing that here is Right. So if
> you drive on the Right in the UK, you're Wrong. In several other
> countries people drive on the Right, which for them is Right On,
> unless they are _meant_ to drive on the Left. Which side is used
> can be a Left-over of a UK connection (eg, former Commonwealth)
> but need not be (eg, Japan -- though possibly they caught it from
> us Brits, seeing it as a sensible Rite). Choice of side to drive
> on surely is one of the Rights of any free country, though not of
> individuals within it: if choice of side were Left to each one of
> us, we'd quickly be in a Right Mess. And some nutters could take
> our choice as a political statement... Maybe we should all drive
> down the Centre?
>
> One day we can discuss the Rules of Cricket.
> --
> Andrew Stephenson[/color]

LOL - Good call!