Re: OT - Bulgaria nationalizes its gas fields

In article <E_U5g.570$Ae1.22@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
"Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> So I am wondering what else can go wrong while Bush is in the White House.
> I'm thinking we are due for an invasion by Martians. And they probably
> carry the bird flue virus. And they thrive on nuclear radiation and use
> radioactive isotopes as good luck charms.[/color]

The media has it in for GWB ever since he trumped their favorite boy,
Gore. So they retaliate by putting a negative spin on all news. After
while this negative spin eventually wears people down. The cure is to
stop watching TV news. Back in WWII there was never a negative spin on
the war. Everything was roses and when we had a bad time of it in a
particular battle the media always made the enemy the really bad guys,
never us. Today it's just the opposite. I have some of the newspapers
from WWII and many articles my grandparents saved and it's quite a stark
contrast from todays news.
--

The ambivalent dbu. wrote:[color=blue]
> In article <E_U5g.570$Ae1.22@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> So I am wondering what else can go wrong while Bush is in the White
>> House. I'm thinking we are due for an invasion by Martians. And
>> they probably carry the bird flue virus. And they thrive on nuclear
>> radiation and use radioactive isotopes as good luck charms.[/color]
>
> The media has it in for GWB ever since he trumped their favorite boy,
> Gore. So they retaliate by putting a negative spin on all news.
> After while this negative spin eventually wears people down. The
> cure is to stop watching TV news. Back in WWII there was never a
> negative spin on the war. Everything was roses and when we had a bad
> time of it in a particular battle the media always made the enemy the
> really bad guys, never us. Today it's just the opposite. I have
> some of the newspapers from WWII and many articles my grandparents
> saved and it's quite a stark contrast from todays news.[/color]

If the press was really after bush, they'd be reporting what's *really*
happening in Iraq and Afghanistan. It's easy to make talking pictures
now-a-days. Of course there's nothing like pining for wars past. Dismembered
bodies, the smell of burning flesh, desecrated landscape. Yes-sir, gimme
some of that!

We know who the bad guys are. There is no argument over that. The issue is
Bush's execution of war strategy. He has created another Vietnam situation
by not putting enuf boots on the ground. Something has got to change.
Unfortuantely, as one comic noted last week, Bush believes on Wednesday
exactly what he believed on Monday notwithstanding what happened on Tuesday.



"The ambivalent dbu." <Relaxand@smelthe./rose.comm> wrote in message
news:Relaxand-CFE201.06461503052006@news-rdr-03.rdc-kc.rr.com...[color=blue]
> In article <E_U5g.570$Ae1.22@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> So I am wondering what else can go wrong while Bush is in the White
>> House.
>> I'm thinking we are due for an invasion by Martians. And they probably
>> carry the bird flue virus. And they thrive on nuclear radiation and use
>> radioactive isotopes as good luck charms.[/color]
>
> The media has it in for GWB ever since he trumped their favorite boy,
> Gore. So they retaliate by putting a negative spin on all news. After
> while this negative spin eventually wears people down. The cure is to
> stop watching TV news. Back in WWII there was never a negative spin on
> the war. Everything was roses and when we had a bad time of it in a
> particular battle the media always made the enemy the really bad guys,
> never us. Today it's just the opposite. I have some of the newspapers
> from WWII and many articles my grandparents saved and it's quite a stark
> contrast from todays news.
> --
>[/color]

"Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:Lf36g.698$Ae1.104@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...[color=blue]
> We know who the bad guys are. There is no argument over that. The issue[/color]
is[color=blue]
> Bush's execution of war strategy. He has created another Vietnam[/color]
situation[color=blue]
> by not putting enuf boots on the ground.[/color]

That and invading the wrong country.
[color=blue]
> Something has got to change.
> Unfortuantely, as one comic noted last week, Bush believes on Wednesday
> exactly what he believed on Monday notwithstanding what happened on[/color]
Tuesday.[color=blue]
>
>
>
> "The ambivalent dbu." <Relaxand@smelthe./rose.comm> wrote in message
> news:Relaxand-CFE201.06461503052006@news-rdr-03.rdc-kc.rr.com...[color=green]
> > In article <E_U5g.570$Ae1.22@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> > "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >> So I am wondering what else can go wrong while Bush is in the White
> >> House.
> >> I'm thinking we are due for an invasion by Martians. And they probably
> >> carry the bird flue virus. And they thrive on nuclear radiation and[/color][/color][/color]
use[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> >> radioactive isotopes as good luck charms.[/color]
> >
> > The media has it in for GWB ever since he trumped their favorite boy,
> > Gore. So they retaliate by putting a negative spin on all news. After
> > while this negative spin eventually wears people down. The cure is to
> > stop watching TV news. Back in WWII there was never a negative spin on
> > the war. Everything was roses and when we had a bad time of it in a
> > particular battle the media always made the enemy the really bad guys,
> > never us. Today it's just the opposite. I have some of the newspapers
> > from WWII and many articles my grandparents saved and it's quite a stark
> > contrast from todays news.
> > --
> >[/color]
>
>[/color]



*** Posted via a free Usenet account from [url]http://www.teranews.com[/url] ***

In article <44589f11$0$3684$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net>,
"FanJet" <FanJet27@hotmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> The ambivalent dbu. wrote:[color=green]
> > In article <E_U5g.570$Ae1.22@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> > "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >> So I am wondering what else can go wrong while Bush is in the White
> >> House. I'm thinking we are due for an invasion by Martians. And
> >> they probably carry the bird flue virus. And they thrive on nuclear
> >> radiation and use radioactive isotopes as good luck charms.[/color]
> >
> > The media has it in for GWB ever since he trumped their favorite boy,
> > Gore. So they retaliate by putting a negative spin on all news.
> > After while this negative spin eventually wears people down. The
> > cure is to stop watching TV news. Back in WWII there was never a
> > negative spin on the war. Everything was roses and when we had a bad
> > time of it in a particular battle the media always made the enemy the
> > really bad guys, never us. Today it's just the opposite. I have
> > some of the newspapers from WWII and many articles my grandparents
> > saved and it's quite a stark contrast from todays news.[/color]
>
> If the press was really after bush, they'd be reporting what's *really*
> happening in Iraq and Afghanistan. It's easy to make talking pictures
> now-a-days. Of course there's nothing like pining for wars past. Dismembered
> bodies, the smell of burning flesh, desecrated landscape. Yes-sir, gimme
> some of that![/color]

only about 1 percent of area in Iraq is trouble, but the media makes it
look like it's total mess.

I would like to see us get the hell out soon though. Let those poor
folks blow each other up if they so choose and Iran take over. It will
make oil go even higher, but don't bother me because I don't drive that
much anymore.

Cheers
--

Art, 5/3/2006, 10:38:35 AM,
<Lf36g.698$Ae1.104@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Unfortuantely, as one comic noted last week, Bush believes on
> Wednesday exactly what he believed on Monday notwithstanding what
> happened on Tuesday.[/color]

I can see where you get your political information.

"The ambivalent dbu." <Relaxand@smelthe./rose.comm> wrote in message
news:Relaxand-35BA56.10363003052006@news-rdr-03.rdc-kc.rr.com...[color=blue]
> In article <44589f11$0$3684$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net>,
> "FanJet" <FanJet27@hotmail.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> The ambivalent dbu. wrote:[color=darkred]
>> > In article <E_U5g.570$Ae1.22@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
>> > "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> So I am wondering what else can go wrong while Bush is in the White
>> >> House. I'm thinking we are due for an invasion by Martians. And
>> >> they probably carry the bird flue virus. And they thrive on nuclear
>> >> radiation and use radioactive isotopes as good luck charms.
>> >
>> > The media has it in for GWB ever since he trumped their favorite boy,
>> > Gore. So they retaliate by putting a negative spin on all news.
>> > After while this negative spin eventually wears people down. The
>> > cure is to stop watching TV news. Back in WWII there was never a
>> > negative spin on the war. Everything was roses and when we had a bad
>> > time of it in a particular battle the media always made the enemy the
>> > really bad guys, never us. Today it's just the opposite. I have
>> > some of the newspapers from WWII and many articles my grandparents
>> > saved and it's quite a stark contrast from todays news.[/color]
>>
>> If the press was really after bush, they'd be reporting what's *really*
>> happening in Iraq and Afghanistan. It's easy to make talking pictures
>> now-a-days. Of course there's nothing like pining for wars past.
>> Dismembered
>> bodies, the smell of burning flesh, desecrated landscape. Yes-sir, gimme
>> some of that![/color]
>
> only about 1 percent of area in Iraq is trouble, but the media makes it
> look like it's total mess.
>
> I would like to see us get the hell out soon though. Let those poor
> folks blow each other up if they so choose and Iran take over. It will
> make oil go even higher, but don't bother me because I don't drive that
> much anymore.
>
> Cheers
> --[/color]

If by 1 percent you mean 1 percent of the population are troublemakers, I
might agree with you. Unfortunately they are causing problems in more than
half of Iraq.