Off-Topic - hey Coyote and BGM...

Thought you might find this interesting:

[url]http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12689293/[/url]

Natalie

Wickeddoll®, 5/8/2006,8:02:35 PM, wrote:
[color=blue]
> Thought you might find this interesting:
>
> [url]http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12689293/[/url][/color]

You really want to start this up again?

I have always said there are those who tend toward the homosexual side.
It's not difficult to spot the effiminate men and masculine women. No
doubt they would find the pheromones appealing or not as the study
indicated, but I'll bet you know more heterosexual examples of the
above than you know homosexual ones. The bottom line (no pun intended)
is they must make a choice to enter into a homosexual relationship
since it is painfully obvious man-man or woman-woman is completely
wrong and un-natural.

The purpose of life is to procreate and extend your species. This is
done by copulation between a male and a female. I know you know all
the details, perhaps better than I do. Male-male female-female just
doesn't work. It is humans who try to change the natural order of
things to satisfy their desire to be different than everyone else.
Some take it to worse extremes than homosexuality, but then they're
really sick.

I know you and I will never agree on this issue so any studies or
opinions we throw at each other won't change our minds. Even
scientific experts don't agree with each other on myriads of topics.
But on this issue common sense is more in order.

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0elzrl52464ez000@news.readfreenews.net...[color=blue]
> Wickeddoll®, 5/8/2006,8:02:35 PM, wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Thought you might find this interesting:
>>
>> [url]http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12689293/[/url][/color]
>
> You really want to start this up again?
>
> I have always said there are those who tend toward the homosexual side.
> It's not difficult to spot the effiminate men and masculine women. No
> doubt they would find the pheromones appealing or not as the study
> indicated, but I'll bet you know more heterosexual examples of the
> above than you know homosexual ones. The bottom line (no pun intended)
> is they must make a choice to enter into a homosexual relationship
> since it is painfully obvious man-man or woman-woman is completely
> wrong and un-natural.
>
> The purpose of life is to procreate and extend your species. This is
> done by copulation between a male and a female. I know you know all
> the details, perhaps better than I do. Male-male female-female just
> doesn't work. It is humans who try to change the natural order of
> things to satisfy their desire to be different than everyone else.
> Some take it to worse extremes than homosexuality, but then they're
> really sick.
>
> I know you and I will never agree on this issue so any studies or
> opinions we throw at each other won't change our minds. Even
> scientific experts don't agree with each other on myriads of topics.
> But on this issue common sense is more in order.[/color]

Feh - just thought you'd think it was an interesting read.

Didn't really expect to change your mind

Natalie

In article <xn0elzrl52464ez000@news.readfreenews.net>,
[email]REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com[/email] says...[color=blue]
> It is humans who try to change the natural order of
> things to satisfy their desire to be different than everyone else.
>
>[/color]
Humans do what they do for pleasure. It the pleasure that entices them,
in "normal" relationships, it is a honey trap, tricking them into
procreating, by enjoying what they are doing first, and thinking about
it after.

You culd consider alcohol in the same way, pleasure first, babies after.
Or is alcohol purely for extending the species and nothing else.
--
Carl Robson
Car PC Build starts again. [url]http://smallr.com/rz[/url]
Homepage: [url]http://www.bouncing-czechs.com[/url]

Wickeddoll® wrote:[color=blue]
> Thought you might find this interesting:
>
> [url]http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12689293/[/url]
>
> Natalie[/color]

Interesting yet ultimately flawed. This doesnt add weight to the
argument for biological preferences, it simply shows that a brain that
is 'tuned' a set way reacts better toward that tuning. I guarantee that
if you put a sewage worker and a normal person into a brain scanner and
looked for activity when exposed to sewage smells the sewage workers
brain would not react anything like as strongly as the normal person.
This simply proves that you can train the brain to ignore/prefer
things.

You could liken it maybe to people who have chosen a certain type of
music as their preference, play them rock music and they may like it,
classical and they'd show negative brain responses. It doesnt mean they
were born with a love of rock music ,or in fact that god made them
rockers. :-) I'd love to see the original report to see its assumptions
and methods in more detail, im kinda geeky like that lol. And yeah, i
learned to be geeky :)

J

"NeedforSwede2" <carl.robson@bouncing-czechs.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1ecbcbdf71a9093f989d8d@news.individual.net...[color=blue]
> In article <xn0elzrl52464ez000@news.readfreenews.net>,
> [email]REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com[/email] says...[color=green]
>> It is humans who try to change the natural order of
>> things to satisfy their desire to be different than everyone else.
>>
>>[/color]
> Humans do what they do for pleasure. It the pleasure that entices them,
> in "normal" relationships, it is a honey trap, tricking them into
> procreating, by enjoying what they are doing first, and thinking about
> it after.
>
> You culd consider alcohol in the same way, pleasure first, babies after.
> Or is alcohol purely for extending the species and nothing else.
> --
> Carl Robson[/color]

Interesting, but whacky concept...

:-)

Natalie

"Coyoteboy" <coyoteboyuk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147270331.450418.291290@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

Wickeddoll® wrote:[color=blue]
> Thought you might find this interesting:
>
> [url]http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12689293/[/url]
>
> Natalie[/color]

Interesting yet ultimately flawed. This doesnt add weight to the
argument for biological preferences, it simply shows that a brain that
is 'tuned' a set way reacts better toward that tuning. I guarantee that
if you put a sewage worker and a normal person into a brain scanner and
looked for activity when exposed to sewage smells the sewage workers
brain would not react anything like as strongly as the normal person.
This simply proves that you can train the brain to ignore/prefer
things.

You could liken it maybe to people who have chosen a certain type of
music as their preference, play them rock music and they may like it,
classical and they'd show negative brain responses. It doesnt mean they
were born with a love of rock music ,or in fact that god made them
rockers. :-) I'd love to see the original report to see its assumptions
and methods in more detail, im kinda geeky like that lol. And yeah, i
learned to be geeky :)

J

So you're saying one can be 'conditioned' to be gay? I don't care how long
you put me in a room with nekked women, I ain't gonna wanna boink them. I
think that's more flawed than this (admittedly unscientific) study.

Could anyone really change *your* sexuality?

It would be interesting to see how they quantified this though.

Natalie

On Wed, 10 May 2006 17:49:36 -0400, "Wickeddoll®"
<wickeddoll1958DIEspammersDIE@yahoo.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>So you're saying one can be 'conditioned' to be gay? I don't care how long
>you put me in a room with nekked women, I ain't gonna wanna boink them.[/color]

I must disagree..

I was born a lesbian and keep that honor to this day....

--

Scott in Florida

Scott in Florida, 5/10/2006,7:37:59 PM, wrote:
[color=blue]
> On Wed, 10 May 2006 17:49:36 -0400, "Wickeddoll®"
> <wickeddoll1958DIEspammersDIE@yahoo.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
> > So you're saying one can be 'conditioned' to be gay? I don't care
> > how long you put me in a room with nekked women, I ain't gonna
> > wanna boink them.[/color]
>
> I must disagree..
>
> I was born a lesbian and keep that honor to this day....[/color]

I guess I'm going to have to come clean. I really didn't like women
until 12 when I discovered my Dad's Playboy room by the garage. There
were centerfolds all over the walls and that's when I was tricked into
becoming a male lesbian also.

"Scott in Florida" <MoveOn@outa.here> wrote in message
news:q9u4621af3edof9rdt0lns33qanbf08b3t@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> On Wed, 10 May 2006 17:49:36 -0400, "Wickeddoll®"
> <wickeddoll1958DIEspammersDIE@yahoo.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>So you're saying one can be 'conditioned' to be gay? I don't care how
>>long
>>you put me in a room with nekked women, I ain't gonna wanna boink them.[/color]
>
> I must disagree..
>
> I was born a lesbian and keep that honor to this day....
>
> --
>
> Scott in Florida[/color]

*fwap*

Natalie

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0em2kok4yzbfs000@news.readfreenews.net...[color=blue]
> Scott in Florida, 5/10/2006,7:37:59 PM, wrote:
>[color=green]
>> On Wed, 10 May 2006 17:49:36 -0400, "Wickeddoll®"
>> <wickeddoll1958DIEspammersDIE@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> > So you're saying one can be 'conditioned' to be gay? I don't care
>> > how long you put me in a room with nekked women, I ain't gonna
>> > wanna boink them.[/color]
>>
>> I must disagree..
>>
>> I was born a lesbian and keep that honor to this day....[/color]
>
> I guess I'm going to have to come clean. I really didn't like women
> until 12 when I discovered my Dad's Playboy room by the garage. There
> were centerfolds all over the walls and that's when I was tricked into
> becoming a male lesbian also.[/color]

You guys are hopeless

Natalie

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0em2kok4yzbfs000@news.readfreenews.net...[color=blue]
> Scott in Florida, 5/10/2006,7:37:59 PM, wrote:
>[color=green]
>> On Wed, 10 May 2006 17:49:36 -0400, "Wickeddoll®"
>> <wickeddoll1958DIEspammersDIE@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> > So you're saying one can be 'conditioned' to be gay? I don't care
>> > how long you put me in a room with nekked women, I ain't gonna
>> > wanna boink them.[/color]
>>
>> I must disagree..
>>
>> I was born a lesbian and keep that honor to this day....[/color]
>
> I guess I'm going to have to come clean. I really didn't like women
> until 12 when I discovered my Dad's Playboy room by the garage. There
> were centerfolds all over the walls and that's when I was tricked into
> becoming a male lesbian also.[/color]

I wanna be a male lesbian, too . . . . Where do I join?

<SEG>

Charles of Schaumburg

Wickeddoll® wrote:[color=blue]
> "Coyoteboy" <coyoteboyuk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> So you're saying one can be 'conditioned' to be gay? I don't care how long
> you put me in a room with nekked women, I ain't gonna wanna boink them. I
> think that's more flawed than this (admittedly unscientific) study.
>
> Could anyone really change *your* sexuality?
>
> It would be interesting to see how they quantified this though.
>
> Natalie[/color]

In a way yes, though i dont think that this can occur later in life. I
believe the best possible explanation is that this is imprinted
during/around puberty. There are several studies that show that
external stresses around puberty can alter your 'grown up' final state,
how much of a highly strung person you are, and there are studies that
very recently have linked mothers stress levels during puberty with
their childrens genetic alteration at a later date. I'll see if i can
find links.
If 'artificially induced' stress hormones during 'sensitive times' can
affect ones childrens genetic makeup, and ones own future mental
health, why can they or other hormones not affect ones sexuality later
in life; Which is, in its simplest form, a hormone response.
On an interesting note, just like with sexuality, highly strung people
are unable to be re-tuned and have a naturally high response to stress
hormones for life, though they can be taught to deal with it better.
This would explain why you couldnt convert me gay no matter how long
you left me in a room of nekkid men.

J

On 11 May 2006 00:25:47 GMT, "badgolferman"
<REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Scott in Florida, 5/10/2006,7:37:59 PM, wrote:
>[color=green]
>> On Wed, 10 May 2006 17:49:36 -0400, "Wickeddoll®"
>> <wickeddoll1958DIEspammersDIE@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> > So you're saying one can be 'conditioned' to be gay? I don't care
>> > how long you put me in a room with nekked women, I ain't gonna
>> > wanna boink them.[/color]
>>
>> I must disagree..
>>
>> I was born a lesbian and keep that honor to this day....[/color]
>
>I guess I'm going to have to come clean. I really didn't like women
>until 12 when I discovered my Dad's Playboy room by the garage. There
>were centerfolds all over the walls and that's when I was tricked into
>becoming a male lesbian also.[/color]

My dad had some really good 'photography' magazines....

.....wonder if that is why I am so into photography now? <g>

--

Scott in Florida

On Wed, 10 May 2006 21:09:15 -0400, "Wickeddoll®"
<wickeddoll1958DIEspammersDIE@yahoo.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>
>"Scott in Florida" <MoveOn@outa.here> wrote in message
>news:q9u4621af3edof9rdt0lns33qanbf08b3t@4ax.com...[color=green]
>> On Wed, 10 May 2006 17:49:36 -0400, "Wickeddoll®"
>> <wickeddoll1958DIEspammersDIE@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>So you're saying one can be 'conditioned' to be gay? I don't care how
>>>long
>>>you put me in a room with nekked women, I ain't gonna wanna boink them.[/color]
>>
>> I must disagree..
>>
>> I was born a lesbian and keep that honor to this day....
>>
>> --
>>
>> Scott in Florida[/color]
>
>*fwap*
>
>Natalie
>[/color]

LOL

.....why did I KNOW that was cumin?

--

Scott in Florida