"Toyota's Sienna gets makeover to stay in game"

Toyota's Sienna gets makeover to stay in game
at [url]http://www.washtimes.com/autoweekend/20060525-011048-3416r.htm[/url]

In article <1148736424.349646.88500@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Mike" <yard22192@yahoo.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Toyota's Sienna gets makeover to stay in game
> at [url]http://www.washtimes.com/autoweekend/20060525-011048-3416r.htm[/url][/color]

This article is horrible. The "makeover" was in 2004; so why, pray
tell, is it being touted in mid-2006 as being meaningful?

This is nothing but a Toyota press release with a silly paragraph at the
beginning. Does anyone doubt that the newspaper took money, one way or
another, to print that drivel?

"Mike" <yard22192@yahoo.com> wrote ...[color=blue]
> Toyota's Sienna gets makeover to stay in game
> at [url]http://www.washtimes.com/autoweekend/20060525-011048-3416r.htm[/url][/color]


The article describes a 2004 event as red-hot May 26, 2006 news!
Makes one wonder, if the author gets paid each time he gets Toyota into news
print. I've read somewhere that the Washington Times is owned by the
Reverend Moon's organisation (remember the "moonies" sect).
Does anyone have details or can confirm this?

Nah, the Washington Times is a conservative Republican newspaper, and
the Washington Post is a liberal Democrat newspaper (Warren Brown is
the auto writer). How can liberal sbe rich if they're anti-capitalism
and anti-business?

"Mike" <yard22192@yahoo.com> wrote[color=blue]
> Nah, the Washington Times is a conservative Republican newspaper, and
> the Washington Post is a liberal Democrat newspaper (Warren Brown is
> the auto writer). How can liberal sbe rich if they're anti-capitalism
> and anti-business?
>[/color]

Hmmm, why let ignorance get in the way of spouting (conservative) nonsense!
According to the Wikipedia Encyclopaedia:
"The Times is the flagship publication of News World Communications, Inc.
(NWC). NWC was founded by the Rev. Moon, and some of its officials are
members of the Unification Church he leads, a fact that has drawn some
criticism and controversy."
Get the details here:
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Times[/url]

Because they inherited their money or they are lawyers? ;)


mike hunt


"Mike" <yard22192@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1148843617.890408.144260@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...[color=blue]
> Nah, the Washington Times is a conservative Republican newspaper, and
> the Washington Post is a liberal Democrat newspaper (Warren Brown is
> the auto writer). How can liberal sbe rich if they're anti-capitalism
> and anti-business?
>[/color]