|
Re: Camry 2007 V6 - Fuel Economy in the City
Original plugs? That's sad, shame on you.
wp51dos wrote:[color=blue]
> i have a 99 camry v6 since new.
>
> 160,000 miles
>
> origional spark plugs.\
>
> easy driving city 20 mpg.
>
>
> Ray O wrote:[color=green]
> > <success_ny@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:1158266373.480412.243350@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...[color=darkred]
> > > The official EPA numbers for Camry 2007 V6 with the 3.5 Liter engine is
> > > 31 miles per gallon on a highway and 22 in the city.
> > >
> > > For Honda Accord V6 with the 3.0L engine the numbers are 29 and 20
> > > respectively.
> > >
> > > Is Camry really that economical? What are the real numbers it gets in
> > > the city? I have to drive in the city traffic most of the time, so the
> > > "city" number is the one I am most concerned about.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >[/color]
> >
> > I cannot speak for the 2007 Camry since I have not driven yet, but the last
> > 60 or 70 new Toyotas that I have driven for at least 1,000 miles have all
> > gotten equal or better than the city and highway EPA.
> >
> > As far as the difference in EPA figures between the Camry and the Accord,
> > the methodology for determining EPA mileage estimates is pretty inflexible,
> > using special test gas, running the vehicle at a specified ambient
> > temperature on a dynamometer, etc. so while the EPA figures are reflective
> > of a very steady driving style, the differences between models will be
> > relative. IOW, there is a good possibility that the Camry will get better
> > mileage than the Accord.
> > --
> >
> > Ray O
> > (correct punctuation to reply)[/color][/color]
|