{OT} pledge to mexican flag in texas school

Stuart Krivis, 9/25/2006, 8:38:48 AM,
<qcjfh2di8crgj13ffs6dl5cvk2s2lpkgpb@4ax.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Interesting.
>
> I have yelled at dizzy when he foams at the mouth too much IMO.
>
> You, on the other hand, seem to be proud of sharx and mike hunt.[/color]

sharx35 and dizzy are in a class by themselves. mike hunt does not
pepper his comments with spiciness and can actually make an argument
that makes sense.

--
"Unfortunately I can not totally agree with comrade Stalin." ~ Famous
Last Words

Stuart Krivis, 9/22/2006, 10:47:05 PM,
<o089h2plmoshbeeu70kf727sc1crnq1nph@4ax.com> wrote:
[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> > > > > Sadly, so many of the righties here don't have a shred of
> > > > > logic or reason hidden anywhere about their persons.
> > > >
> > > > ROFL.....
> > > >
> > > > You libs 'think' you are superior....
> > > >
> > > > I'd match IQ's with ya any day!
> > >
> > > I gave you an opportunity to do so and you passed on it.
> > >
> > > You lose.[/color]
> >
> > I never lose to you....
> >
> > Never have....
> >
> > Never will....[/color]
>
> You lost. Get over it.[/color]

I can see a lot of logic and reasoning going on here...

Hachiroku, 9/23/2006, 7:49:59 PM, <HKjRg.178$8U2.84@trndny08> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Watch it, Cath, or Scotty will give you a "don't let the door slap
> your..." ! ;)[/color]

Sounds to me like you would rather be doing the slapping on the ...!

On 25 Sep 2006 13:15:58 GMT, "badgolferman"
<REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Stuart Krivis, 9/22/2006, 10:47:05 PM,
><o089h2plmoshbeeu70kf727sc1crnq1nph@4ax.com> wrote:
>[color=green][color=darkred]
>> > > > > Sadly, so many of the righties here don't have a shred of
>> > > > > logic or reason hidden anywhere about their persons.
>> > > >
>> > > > ROFL.....
>> > > >
>> > > > You libs 'think' you are superior....
>> > > >
>> > > > I'd match IQ's with ya any day!
>> > >
>> > > I gave you an opportunity to do so and you passed on it.
>> > >
>> > > You lose.
>> >
>> > I never lose to you....
>> >
>> > Never have....
>> >
>> > Never will....[/color]
>>
>> You lost. Get over it.[/color]
>
>I can see a lot of logic and reasoning going on here...[/color]

I was simply imitating his style of discussion. :-)

There's no point in trying to reason with him because he doesn't
reason. He just types "LOL LOL ROFLMAO I win."

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0ermy4xftusha000@news.readfreenews.net...[color=blue]
> Cathy F., 9/22/2006, 4:25:47 PM,
> <7vudnak1HYYN24nYnZ2dnUVZ_qidnZ2d@giganews.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>
>> "sharx35" <sharx35@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:uROQg.35202$E67.20557@clgrps13...[color=darkred]
>> >
>> >"Stuart Krivis" <jd@mongo.krivis.com> wrote in message[/color]
>> news:8de5h29fkv7vl7qesr4b4v0nai001b0mm5@4ax.com... >>On Thu, 21 Sep
>> 2006 14:58:46 GMT, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.gts> wrote:[color=darkred]
>> > >
>> > > > > > Stuart...you can't say the Pledge Of Allegence to the
>> > > > > > AMERICAN Flag in a public school!!!!!
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > You can't make it a policy to have the children recite it
>> > > > > every morning anyway...
>> > > >
>> > > > Why not? This is America. Be an American!
>> > >
>> > > Because of the phrase below.
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > It's also because of the phrase "under God."
>> > > >
>> > > > Take it out. It wasn't added until the 30's or 50's anyway...
>> > >
>> > > '50s if I remember.
>> > >
>> > > I'd have no problem with it if it didn't mention religion.
>> >
>> > Then, don't say it but STOP interfering with the rights of the VAST
>> > MAJORITY who have NO problem with the old wording. Asshole leftie
>> > LIEbrawl DIMMIES, however, just HAVE to force EVERYONE to confirm
>> > to THEIR narrow little focus.[/color]
>>
>> Ummm... you need to be reminded, yet again I guess, that the "old
>> wording" of the Pledge - the original wording, did not include "under
>> God".
>>
>> Claiming that liberals have narrow viewpoints is a little strange.
>> To say the least. Liberals have broader, more liberal viewpoints
>> than conservatives on most issues. That's why they're called...
>> ta-da!... liberals. And why conservatives are called... ta-da!...
>> conservatives.
>>
>> Cathy[/color]
>
> The problem with your description is liberals have a very narrow view
> of anything that conservatives support. They automatically assume it's
> a bad idea if a conservative thought of it first.
>
> Liberals support anything that goes against morality, ethics, family,
> decency, and generally the majority view. It is their goal to change
> the established norm, and that's not always bad. Unfortunately with
> the catering to extremist elements of the liberal factions the standard
> of liberalism has been skewed so far to complete idiocy that most
> people with common sense or who aren't on the government dole have
> rejected what they stand for.
>
> --
> "Conservative, n. A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as
> distinguished from the liberal, who wishes to replace them with
> others." ~ Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary[/color]

Of all the wars that have occured in the 20th Century, none have occured
because America was too strong.

- Ronald Reagan, edited.

Charles of Schaumburg

"Stuart Krivis" <jd@mongo.krivis.com> wrote in message
news:12n7h29qic67qbqgfji4ojinat9hqnf7bi@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:42:30 -0400, "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net>
> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>if I person prefers not to say it, they don't have to. OTOH, I've been
>>teaching for 34 years & have yet to encounter someone in my class who
>>refused to say it (or whose parents forbid it).[/color]
>
> I know some parents that would be beating down your door the next day
> if you even suggested it in a class with their kids. :-)[/color]

Left-wing, brain-dead DEMONrats.

[color=blue]
>
> I don't have a problem with it religiously or anything, but I don't
> want anything that could be divisive (like religion) in the public
> schools.
>
> For instance, I remember in grade school that, during the Christmas
> season when everyone was busy making Christmas things, the Jewish kids
> were told, "You don't celebrate Christmas, so go sit over there and
> wait until everyone else is done."
>
> If we can't handle things with sensitivity, then we just have to stop
> the whole activity.
>[color=green]
>>
>>As a side note... Personally, I'd prefer that the "under God" wasn't in
>>it -
>>that the Pledge was still in its original form, but I can live w/it.[/color]
>
> It does bother me a bit because it no longer applies to all Americans.
> I think the pledge should be something that every American can say to
> show respect and honor.
>
> BTW, I like the Mexican pledge. It seems like something the Mexicans
> can be proud of and proud to recite. :-)
>
>[/color]