OT - Iraq war has made US less safe from terrorists

[url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/09/24/iraq.main/index.html[/url]

On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:02:02 GMT, "Art"
<begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>[url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/09/24/iraq.main/index.html[/url]
>[/color]

Clintoon made it safe for terrorists to attack us....

Did you see your hero turn purple?

LOL

--

Scott in Florida

as soon as he waved his finger I figured it was all lies.

BUT

maybe Rove got to the lighting man and caused him to turn purple?

Then he was saying to read Clarke's book for the truth. Geez. Clarke
and Berger knew the truth?

A thief and a dingaling! What powerful character references.

In article <nEGRg.4907$GR.4170@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"ron" <really [email]good@serviceu.com[/email]> wrote:
[color=blue]
> as soon as he waved his finger I figured it was all lies.
>
> BUT
>
> maybe Rove got to the lighting man and caused him to turn purple?
>
> Then he was saying to read Clarke's book for the truth. Geez. Clarke
> and Berger knew the truth?
>
> A thief and a dingaling! What powerful character references.[/color]

Yep, when I heard him mention clarke's book for truth, that was the
zinger, it appeared he could hardly keep a straight face.

Anybody who believes this guy is less than just naive.
--

That is one opinion, others believe otherwise.


mike hunt


"Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:enCRg.757$Y24.353@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...[color=blue]
> [url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/09/24/iraq.main/index.html[/url]
>[/color]

Art wrote:
[color=blue]
>[url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/09/24/iraq.main/index.html[/url][/color]

Yep. Just as I've been saying all along. It's not like it's a
surprising result of our actions...

Of course, the braying jackasses on the right will ridicule the
report, claiming that it's all wrong. They don't seem to really care
about what's best for our country or the world. It's like a big
football game or something to these idiots.

On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:34:09 GMT, dizzy <dizzy@nospam.invalid> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Of course, the braying jackasses on the right will ridicule the
>report, claiming that it's all wrong. They don't seem to really care
>about what's best for our country or the world.[/color]

That from a member of the kookie left?

ROFLMAO


--

Scott in Florida

On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:16:24 GMT, "Roadrunner Newsgroup"
<RRNG@highlandcraft.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Did you notice how the purple faced BOZO neglected to anwer the specific
>question about what he had done about al-kaida (small a for the little
>cowards that hide and kill innocent people) and went into his burning tyrade
>on Bin Laden to distract from the fact that he did nothing about al-kaida.
>Just thought I would point that out since most in the liberal establishment
>(I read it in the NYT, it must be a fact group) surely missed it as they
>were once again lead to believe what he wanted them to believe (they miss
>that being lied to and believing it stuff). al-kaida said they would take
>down the Trade center after their first un-challenged try, and they spent
>the 8 easy years with the clown getting BJs to train and plan before someone
>gets in office that will fight back. They killed Americans 3 times on his
>watch completely unanswered except with idle threats from again, BOZO. Came
>close to killing Bin Laden, you mean Chckened out! At least the current Prez
>took his country, chased him into a cave, and killed 75% of his top
>leadership. No courage to lead! There's the BOZO legacy. Imagine what they
>do when another weak on war lefty gets in there. Bin Laden is/was just a
>figure head, al-kaida grew and flourished under BOZO. And by the way, what a
>rude self centered man. He led /leads the rest of em.
>
>
>
>Did you ever wonder why Bin Laden has a AK in the pictures? Why does he need
>that to hide like a coward in a cave?[/color]

BOZO showed his true self.

A coward traitor that we are well rid of.

His wife is worse....

[color=blue]
>
>
>
>
>"Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote in message
>news:enCRg.757$Y24.353@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...[color=green]
>> [url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/09/24/iraq.main/index.html[/url]
>>[/color]
>[/color]

--

Scott in Florida

Scott in Florida wrote:
[color=blue]
>(snip)[/color]

Typical fact-free personal attacks and idiocy from a right-winger.
I'm almost embarrassed for him.

On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:27:02 GMT, dizzy <dizzy@nospam.invalid> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Scott in Florida wrote:
>[color=green]
>>(snip)[/color]
>
>Typical fact-free personal attacks and idiocy from a right-winger.
>I'm almost embarrassed for him.[/color]

Yes, me too, dizzy.

You really are over the edge......


--

Scott in Florida

Scott in Florida wrote:
[color=blue]
>On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:27:02 GMT, dizzy <dizzy@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>Scott in Florida wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>(snip)[/color]
>>
>>Typical fact-free personal attacks and idiocy from a right-winger.
>>I'm almost embarrassed for him.[/color]
>
>Yes, me too, dizzy.
>
>You really are over the edge......[/color]

Let me get this straight: A classified intelligence report concludes
that the Iraq war has worsened the terrorist threat to the United
States, which means that I've been right all-along, and that makes me
"really over the edge"?

Or is it because I pointed-out how typically lame your "kooky left
ROFLOL" post was?

Typical fact-free personal attacks and idiocy from a right-winger.
I'm almost embarrassed for him.

In article <grtgh2lrbtarso7c6471an7tijcaf83kp5@4ax.com>,
dizzy <dizzy@nospam.invalid> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Scott in Florida wrote:
>[color=green]
> >On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:27:02 GMT, dizzy <dizzy@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >>Scott in Florida wrote:
> >>
> >>>(snip)
> >>
> >>Typical fact-free personal attacks and idiocy from a right-winger.
> >>I'm almost embarrassed for him.[/color]
> >
> >Yes, me too, dizzy.
> >
> >You really are over the edge......[/color]
>
> Let me get this straight: A classified intelligence report concludes
> that the Iraq war has worsened the terrorist threat to the United
> States, which means that I've been right all-along, and that makes me
> "really over the edge"?[/color]


Have you actually read this "classified" report? How could anyone know
what's in the report if it's classified?
--

On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:34:15 GMT, " dbu," <howard@dynosadork.com>
wrote:
[color=blue]
>In article <grtgh2lrbtarso7c6471an7tijcaf83kp5@4ax.com>,
> dizzy <dizzy@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Scott in Florida wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> >On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:27:02 GMT, dizzy <dizzy@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> >
>> >>Scott in Florida wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>(snip)
>> >>
>> >>Typical fact-free personal attacks and idiocy from a right-winger.
>> >>I'm almost embarrassed for him.
>> >
>> >Yes, me too, dizzy.
>> >
>> >You really are over the edge......[/color]
>>
>> Let me get this straight: A classified intelligence report concludes
>> that the Iraq war has worsened the terrorist threat to the United
>> States, which means that I've been right all-along, and that makes me
>> "really over the edge"?[/color]
>
>
>Have you actually read this "classified" report? How could anyone know
>what's in the report if it's classified?[/color]

He does make you wonder, does he not?


--

Scott in Florida

In article <tq1hh2tnjksrfskpte2g4v0t86riceto3n@4ax.com>,
Scott in Florida <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:34:15 GMT, " dbu," <howard@dynosadork.com>
> wrote:
>[color=green]
> >In article <grtgh2lrbtarso7c6471an7tijcaf83kp5@4ax.com>,
> > dizzy <dizzy@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >> Scott in Florida wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:27:02 GMT, dizzy <dizzy@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>Scott in Florida wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>(snip)
> >> >>
> >> >>Typical fact-free personal attacks and idiocy from a right-winger.
> >> >>I'm almost embarrassed for him.
> >> >
> >> >Yes, me too, dizzy.
> >> >
> >> >You really are over the edge......
> >>
> >> Let me get this straight: A classified intelligence report concludes
> >> that the Iraq war has worsened the terrorist threat to the United
> >> States, which means that I've been right all-along, and that makes me
> >> "really over the edge"?[/color]
> >
> >
> >Have you actually read this "classified" report? How could anyone know
> >what's in the report if it's classified?[/color]
>
> He does make you wonder, does he not?[/color]

Did you see Sec. Rice's remarks about the clinton interview the other
day?

[url]http://tinyurl.com/p6du5[/url]

She basically called him a liar, which we all know anyway, but she did
it in a more respectful way. She's quite the lady.
--

ron wrote:
[color=blue]
> Then he was saying to read Clarke's book for the truth. Geez. Clarke
> and Berger knew the truth?[/color]

Samuel Berger was a lightweight who should never have been the
president's foreign policy advisor; the job should have been given to
Richard Holbrook instead. OTOH Richard Clarke was highly qualified,
and remember that in Jan. 2001, he told GW Bush that the #1 threat to
the US was al Quada. Unfortunately the next person to speak to GW Bush
was Condi Rice, who told him that the #1 threat was Iraq.