{OT} Pelosi becomes Speaker?!?!?!

PLEASE!!!! LET ME OUT NOW!!!!!

What a freakin' MOONBAT! Please, PLEASE vote for whatever Republican is
running!

You may think it's bad, but can you EVEN imagine Pelousi as Speaker of the
House?!?!?!

Hachiroku, 10/4/2006, 1:12:39 PM, <bYRUg.7683$tN.215@trndny06> wrote:
[color=blue]
> PLEASE!!!! LET ME OUT NOW!!!!!
>
> What a freakin' MOONBAT! Please, PLEASE vote for whatever Republican
> is running!
>
> You may think it's bad, but can you EVEN imagine Pelousi as Speaker
> of the House?!?!?![/color]

Are you just realizing this now? What does this say about the party
that chose her as their leader?

--
"Every government is run by liars and nothing they say should be
believed." ~ I.F. Stone

"Hachiroku" <Trueno@ae86.gts> wrote in message
news:bYRUg.7683$tN.215@trndny06...[color=blue]
> PLEASE!!!! LET ME OUT NOW!!!!!
>
> What a freakin' MOONBAT! Please, PLEASE vote for whatever Republican is
> running!
>
> You may think it's bad, but can you EVEN imagine Pelousi as Speaker of the
> House?!?!?!
>[/color]
Oh sure, she's so much more horrific than that overstuffed idiot Hastert,
who can't find his ass with a roadmap, let alone discover a pedophile under
his nose, while the rest of DC knows about Foley's predeliction for young
pages.
Nonsense!

badgolferman wrote:[color=blue]
>
> "Every government is run by liars and nothing they say should be
> believed." ~ I.F. Stone[/color]
===

The great I. F. Stone was on the left end of the political
spectrum.

Anyone ever read his "I. F. Stone Weekly?"

I was delighted to find its archives in Washington University's
Olin Library in Saint Louis. What a thrill that was.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from [url]http://www.teranews.com[/url]

On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 10:28:35 -0700, mack wrote:
[color=blue]
>
> "Hachiroku" <Trueno@ae86.gts> wrote in message
> news:bYRUg.7683$tN.215@trndny06...[color=green]
>> PLEASE!!!! LET ME OUT NOW!!!!!
>>
>> What a freakin' MOONBAT! Please, PLEASE vote for whatever Republican is
>> running!
>>
>> You may think it's bad, but can you EVEN imagine Pelousi as Speaker of the
>> House?!?!?!
>>[/color]
> Oh sure, she's so much more horrific than that overstuffed idiot Hastert,
> who can't find his ass with a roadmap, let alone discover a pedophile under
> his nose, while the rest of DC knows about Foley's predeliction for young
> pages.[/color]

And who would that be?

I heard an ad on the radio for something similar to this, something to the
effect of a "cover up" (Um, who was covering up?! You have to KNOW about
something before you can cover it up!!)

Not sticking up for the guy by any means! He should go to jail for sure!
But people are taking great leaps and bounds here pointing fingers, when
there really shouldn't be any fingers to point!

A lot of people are jumping to Contusions...

As far as Pelosi?

We ALL know she's a k00k!


[color=blue]
> Nonsense![/color]

On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 10:28:35 -0700, "mack" <mackerel@dslextreme.com>
wrote:
[color=blue]
>
>"Hachiroku" <Trueno@ae86.gts> wrote in message
>news:bYRUg.7683$tN.215@trndny06...[color=green]
>> PLEASE!!!! LET ME OUT NOW!!!!!
>>
>> What a freakin' MOONBAT! Please, PLEASE vote for whatever Republican is
>> running!
>>
>> You may think it's bad, but can you EVEN imagine Pelousi as Speaker of the
>> House?!?!?!
>>[/color]
>Oh sure, she's so much more horrific than that overstuffed idiot Hastert,
>who can't find his ass with a roadmap, let alone discover a pedophile under
>his nose, while the rest of DC knows about Foley's predeliction for young
>pages.
>Nonsense!
>[/color]

I don't really like Hastert _or_ Pelosi, but that's just me. :-)

In article <bYRUg.7683$tN.215@trndny06>, Hachiroku <Trueno@ae86.gts>
wrote:
[color=blue]
> PLEASE!!!! LET ME OUT NOW!!!!!
>
> What a freakin' MOONBAT! Please, PLEASE vote for whatever Republican is
> running!
>
> You may think it's bad, but can you EVEN imagine Pelousi as Speaker of the
> House?!?!?![/color]

I wish she and Harry would get on their boxes, get some face time on TV
and let the nation know what they have in store for us when they take
over control of congress. On second thought, maybe that wouldn't be
such a good idea, for them.
--

Hachiroku wrote:[color=blue]
>
> As far as Pelosi? We ALL know she's a k00k![/color]

====

Well, I will say the married Pelosi is not a True Hetero. She is a
Nominal Hetero. But as I don't discriminate between Nominals and Trues,
I will be excited to see her as Speaker of the House. And Hillary
Clinton as President. Hillary and Nancy will lead us out of the big
financial and military messes that "His Majesty Queen Bush" is responsible
for.

As I've said before, almost everybody in Congress is a Nominal
Hetero. Notable exceptions that immediately come to my mind right now
are Senator Olympia Snowe of Maine and Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney of
New York. They are both True Heteros.

But again, we're all humans. Nominal or True, it doesn't make a
difference. My only pause when it comes to the Nominal-True
dichotomy is that I won't marry a Nominal [chuckle]. But we're all
alike in every other way :-)


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from [url]http://www.teranews.com[/url]

In article <4523ffb3$0$19691$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>,
Built_Well <Built_Well_Toyota@hotmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Hachiroku wrote:[color=green]
> >
> > As far as Pelosi? We ALL know she's a k00k![/color]
>
> ====
>
>
> Hillary and Nancy will lead us out of the big
> financial and military messes[/color]

Now that is the biggest crock of BS I've heard in a long time.

You like paying more taxes then be my guest. Only I want the taxes to
be fair. Because I don't itemize anymore I don't want anybody to have
any deductions what so ever. A flat tax is the only way to go.
--

Pardon me, I meant to say New York Congresswoman Carolyn McCarthy
is a True Hetero in Congress. I mistakenly said Carolyn "Maloney."
Both Carolyns--McCarthy and Maloney--are Democratic New York
Congresswomen, representing different districts.

McCarthy, a True Hetero, is the strong gun control advocate who has
represented her constituents since 1997.

=====

Built_Well wrote:
[color=blue]
> Well, I will say the married Pelosi is not a True Hetero. She is a
> Nominal Hetero. But as I don't discriminate between Nominals and Trues,
> I will be excited to see her as Speaker of the House. And Hillary
> Clinton as President. Hillary and Nancy will lead us out of the big
> financial and military messes that "His Majesty Queen Bush" is
> responsible for.
>
> As I've said before, almost everybody in Congress is a Nominal
> Hetero. Notable exceptions that immediately come to my mind right now
> are Senator Olympia Snowe of Maine and Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney of
> New York. They are both True Heteros.
>
> But again, we're all humans. Nominal or True, it doesn't make a
> difference. My only pause when it comes to the Nominal-True dichotomy
> is that I won't marry a Nominal [chuckle]. But we're all alike in every
> other way :-)[/color]


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from [url]http://www.teranews.com[/url]

Built_Well, 10/4/2006,3:34:54 PM, wrote:
[color=blue]
> Hachiroku wrote:[color=green]
> >
> > As far as Pelosi? We ALL know she's a k00k![/color]
>
> ====
>
> Well, I will say the married Pelosi is not a True Hetero. She is
> a Nominal Hetero. But as I don't discriminate between Nominals and
> Trues, I will be excited to see her as Speaker of the House. And
> Hillary Clinton as President. Hillary and Nancy will lead us out of
> the big financial and military messes that "His Majesty Queen Bush"
> is responsible for.
>
> As I've said before, almost everybody in Congress is a Nominal
> Hetero. Notable exceptions that immediately come to my mind right
> now are Senator Olympia Snowe of Maine and Congresswoman Carolyn
> Maloney of New York. They are both True Heteros.
>
> But again, we're all humans. Nominal or True, it doesn't make a
> difference. My only pause when it comes to the Nominal-True
> dichotomy is that I won't marry a Nominal [chuckle]. But we're all
> alike in every other way :-)[/color]

You've really got a hard on for these sexuality things, don't you?

badgolferman wrote:[color=blue]
>
> You've really got a hard on for these sexuality things, don't you?[/color]
=====

Now BGM, would you have been so rude to sexuality researchers
Kinsey or Masters and Johnson? :-P

I'm simply classifying folks into 4 categories: True Hetero,
Nominal Hetero, Out Gay, and Closet Gay.

And as I've said before, BadGolferMan, you are my good Usenet buddy,
I enjoy reading your posts, and we all know you are a True Hetero :-)

The truest of the True, BGM [chuckle] :-)




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from [url]http://www.teranews.com[/url]

On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 14:52:31 -0400, Stuart Krivis wrote:
[color=blue]
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 10:28:35 -0700, "mack" <mackerel@dslextreme.com>
> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>
>>"Hachiroku" <Trueno@ae86.gts> wrote in message
>>news:bYRUg.7683$tN.215@trndny06...[color=darkred]
>>> PLEASE!!!! LET ME OUT NOW!!!!!
>>>
>>> What a freakin' MOONBAT! Please, PLEASE vote for whatever Republican is
>>> running!
>>>
>>> You may think it's bad, but can you EVEN imagine Pelousi as Speaker of the
>>> House?!?!?!
>>>[/color]
>>Oh sure, she's so much more horrific than that overstuffed idiot Hastert,
>>who can't find his ass with a roadmap, let alone discover a pedophile under
>>his nose, while the rest of DC knows about Foley's predeliction for young
>>pages.
>>Nonsense!
>>[/color]
>
> I don't really like Hastert _or_ Pelosi, but that's just me. :-)[/color]


Maybe there's some hope for you after all! (Neither do *I*! ;)

BadGolferman, in all seriousness, though, I'm confident nobody
in this newsgroup is straighter than you.


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from [url]http://www.teranews.com[/url]

One thing I have to wonder about is why there are so few True
Heteros in Congress. Almost everybody there is a Nominal. I certainly
hope there's not a bias by Nominal Heteros against True Heteros.

But then, bias is rampant in our society. We see few women and
minorities in Congress, also. But it's nice to see things are
improving.

In fact, it's imperative to increase female participation
in Congress. Men have screwed things up for far, far too long [chuckle] :-)




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from [url]http://www.teranews.com[/url]