OT I'm back...

I believe you are confusing conservatives, who are the true
environmentalists, with liberal who are the environuts. True
environmentalists are people that do not want to destroy their own
environment. In other words, they do not want to poop where the eat, but
they know they must take care of the poop. Environuts, on the other hand
are people that will do whatever it takes to make sure there is no poop, to
the point of not eating. Man needs to work with nature to survive, not in
conflict. Even the first farmers soon learned the tomato plants that got
the best tomatoes were the ones near where the horses pooped. God made
coal and oil for mans use and he made it out of carbon, dirty stuff. That
does not mean we should not use it? Of course not, it simply means if you
'spill' some, clean it up. LOL


mike hunt


"larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencurly@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1160786428.648272.49690@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...[color=blue]
>
> "Grasping" for air??? No, I showed that Teddy Roosevelt wasn't a
> conservative Republican but a liberal one. The fact is that
> conservationism has been mostly a liberal movement, and conservatives
> have been rare among the ranks. Can you cite any?
>[/color]

Mike Hunter wrote:
[color=blue]
> I believe you are confusing conservatives, who are the true
> environmentalists, with liberal who are the environuts. True
> environmentalists are people that do not want to destroy their own
> environment. In other words, they do not want to poop where the eat, but
> they know they must take care of the poop. Environuts, on the other hand
> are people that will do whatever it takes to make sure there is no poop, to
> the point of not eating. Man needs to work with nature to survive, not in
> conflict.[/color]

Environmentalism can be compatible with both conservatism and
liberalism, but where have the conservative environmentalists been?
Show me some environmental programs that were sponsored primarily by
conservatives and that weren't merely attempts to thwart stronger
programs.

dbu wrote:[color=blue]
> In article <1160810767.189307.62410@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,[/color]
[color=blue]
> I've seen more personal freedoms lost because of the democrats
> than of the Republicans. For a start, the democrats want strict
> gun control, in fact if it were up to some of your leaders there
> would be no guns period.
>[color=green]
> > Neither Saddam Hussein nor the Taliban ever restricted gun ownership,
> > so why don't you join those freedom-loving people?[/color]
>
> Just ask george soros a leading money bag for hillary clinton.
>[color=green]
> > I thought that for a change you'd list some evidence for your argument
> > (after all, you wrote, "For a start,..."), but you ground to a halt and
> > instead rambled about one of the right's bogeymen.
> >
> > Why would a person like George Soros, who experienced the horrors of
> > both the Nazis and the Soviets, hate freedom?[/color]
>
> blink blink....because he don't like guns.[/color]

As usual, you've shown that you have no reasoning behind your opinions.

larry moe 'n curly, 10/13/2006,8:47:23 PM, wrote:
[color=blue][color=green]
> > You grasping for air again, LOL.[/color]
>
> "Grasping" for air??? No, I showed that Teddy Roosevelt wasn't a
> conservative Republican but a liberal one. The fact is that
> conservationism has been mostly a liberal movement, and conservatives
> have been rare among the ranks. Can you cite any?[/color]

[url]http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061013/ap_on_sc/great_lakes_cleanup_1[/url]

In article <xn0eshtdn2k8zh9000@news.readfreenews.net>,
"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> larry moe 'n curly, 10/13/2006,8:47:23 PM, wrote:
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> > > You grasping for air again, LOL.[/color]
> >
> > "Grasping" for air??? No, I showed that Teddy Roosevelt wasn't a
> > conservative Republican but a liberal one. The fact is that
> > conservationism has been mostly a liberal movement, and conservatives
> > have been rare among the ranks. Can you cite any?[/color]
>
> [url]http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061013/ap_on_sc/great_lakes_cleanup_1[/url][/color]

The silence is deafening.
--

On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:20:12 GMT, dbu <howardyno@jackass.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>In article <xn0eshtdn2k8zh9000@news.readfreenews.net>,
> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> larry moe 'n curly, 10/13/2006,8:47:23 PM, wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> > > You grasping for air again, LOL.
>> >
>> > "Grasping" for air??? No, I showed that Teddy Roosevelt wasn't a
>> > conservative Republican but a liberal one. The fact is that
>> > conservationism has been mostly a liberal movement, and conservatives
>> > have been rare among the ranks. Can you cite any?[/color]
>>
>> [url]http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061013/ap_on_sc/great_lakes_cleanup_1[/url][/color]
>
>The silence is deafening.[/color]

The libs are a lot of fun.

First they say prove it.

We prove it and they either say the source is bad or don't
answer....LOL


--

Scott in Florida

"Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
news:mvl4j25i17mc188hdhlpd6v20phbog0nii@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:20:12 GMT, dbu <howardyno@jackass.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>In article <xn0eshtdn2k8zh9000@news.readfreenews.net>,
>> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> larry moe 'n curly, 10/13/2006,8:47:23 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>> > > You grasping for air again, LOL.
>>> >
>>> > "Grasping" for air??? No, I showed that Teddy Roosevelt wasn't a
>>> > conservative Republican but a liberal one. The fact is that
>>> > conservationism has been mostly a liberal movement, and conservatives
>>> > have been rare among the ranks. Can you cite any?
>>>
>>> [url]http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061013/ap_on_sc/great_lakes_cleanup_1[/url][/color]
>>
>>The silence is deafening.[/color]
>
> The libs are a lot of fun.
>
> First they say prove it.
>
> We prove it and they either say the source is bad or don't
> answer....LOL
>
>[/color]

Welcome to our world!

On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:34:05 GMT, "Truckdude" <notl@cox.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
>
>"Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
>news:mvl4j25i17mc188hdhlpd6v20phbog0nii@4ax.com...[color=green]
>> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:20:12 GMT, dbu <howardyno@jackass.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>In article <xn0eshtdn2k8zh9000@news.readfreenews.net>,
>>> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> larry moe 'n curly, 10/13/2006,8:47:23 PM, wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > > You grasping for air again, LOL.
>>>> >
>>>> > "Grasping" for air??? No, I showed that Teddy Roosevelt wasn't a
>>>> > conservative Republican but a liberal one. The fact is that
>>>> > conservationism has been mostly a liberal movement, and conservatives
>>>> > have been rare among the ranks. Can you cite any?
>>>>
>>>> [url]http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061013/ap_on_sc/great_lakes_cleanup_1[/url]
>>>
>>>The silence is deafening.[/color]
>>
>> The libs are a lot of fun.
>>
>> First they say prove it.
>>
>> We prove it and they either say the source is bad or don't
>> answer....LOL
>>
>>[/color]
>
>Welcome to our world!
>[/color]

LOL...thanks....

I keep forgetting....it is the seriousness of the charge...


--

Scott in Florida