OT: Air America bankrupt

[url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/10/13/airamerica.radio.ap/index.html[/url]
--

I am so confused! (hehehehehe) If Airamerica purports to convey the
feelings/message of the vast majority of Americans (except the ones
that stole the elections for Bush) how can't they help but be a cash
cow?

Poor management? Theft? Couldn't be the message could it?

Ron

In article <lNTXg.10096$TV3.3187@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>,
"ron" <really [email]good@serviceu.com[/email]> wrote:
[color=blue]
> I am so confused! (hehehehehe) If Airamerica purports to convey the
> feelings/message of the vast majority of Americans (except the ones
> that stole the elections for Bush) how can't they help but be a cash
> cow?
>
> Poor management? Theft? Couldn't be the message could it?
>
> Ron[/color]

Watch the dimmies if they gain control to revamp the rules for equal
time on talk shows. Another freedom taken away by the two faced, talk
out of both sides of mouth so called liberals, LOL.
--

On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 21:44:49 GMT, "ron" <really [email]good@serviceu.com[/email]>
wrote:
[color=blue]
>I am so confused! (hehehehehe) If Airamerica purports to convey the
>feelings/message of the vast majority of Americans (except the ones
>that stole the elections for Bush) how can't they help but be a cash
>cow?
>
>Poor management? Theft? Couldn't be the message could it?
>
>Ron
>[/color]

It seems the liberal 'message' does not sell very well......

How can this be?

The libs are so smart....


--

Scott in Florida

"Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
news:crl0j2di548kc92svo00lvf5iplh1pt3ga@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 21:44:49 GMT, "ron" <really [email]good@serviceu.com[/email]>
> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>I am so confused! (hehehehehe) If Airamerica purports to convey the
>>feelings/message of the vast majority of Americans (except the ones
>>that stole the elections for Bush) how can't they help but be a cash
>>cow?
>>
>>Poor management? Theft? Couldn't be the message could it?
>>
>>Ron
>>[/color]
>
> It seems the liberal 'message' does not sell very well......
>
> How can this be?
>
> The libs are so smart....
>
>
> --
>
> Scott in Florida
>[/color]

Once Ron Reagan's FCC did away with Section 315, the liberals lost their
hold. . . .(Section 315 is also known as the 'Fairness Doctrine')

Three Cheers for Ronald Reagan. I just bought some 39 cent stamps with his
face on them.

Charles of Schaumburg

In article <2IKdnesf-Pb9ZqzYnZ2dnUVZ_oydnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"n5hsr" <n5hsr@comcast.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
> "Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
> news:crl0j2di548kc92svo00lvf5iplh1pt3ga@4ax.com...[color=green]
> > On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 21:44:49 GMT, "ron" <really [email]good@serviceu.com[/email]>
> > wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >>I am so confused! (hehehehehe) If Airamerica purports to convey the
> >>feelings/message of the vast majority of Americans (except the ones
> >>that stole the elections for Bush) how can't they help but be a cash
> >>cow?
> >>
> >>Poor management? Theft? Couldn't be the message could it?
> >>
> >>Ron
> >>[/color]
> >
> > It seems the liberal 'message' does not sell very well......
> >
> > How can this be?
> >
> > The libs are so smart....
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Scott in Florida
> >[/color]
>
> Once Ron Reagan's FCC did away with Section 315, the liberals lost their
> hold. . . .(Section 315 is also known as the 'Fairness Doctrine')
>
> Three Cheers for Ronald Reagan. I just bought some 39 cent stamps with his
> face on them.
>
> Charles of Schaumburg[/color]

The fairness doctrine, another attempt by the liberals to take away
freedom.
--

In article <2IKdnesf-Pb9ZqzYnZ2dnUVZ_oydnZ2d@comcast.com>
[email]n5hsr@comcast.net[/email] "n5hsr" writes:
[color=blue]
> Three Cheers for Ronald Reagan. I just bought some 39 cent
> stamps with his face on them.[/color]

Logically, one should _use_ stamps bearing the faces of people
one doesn't like. Think what happens during the postal process:
a Mega-Nasty (and possibly politically adverse) Man comes along
with a rubber stamp and bashes ink on the face of Beloved Hero.

OTOH, if you just bought them to pin up and admire, that's okay.
--
Andrew Stephenson

"Andrew Stephenson" <ames@deltrak.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1160918140snz@deltrak.demon.co.uk...[color=blue]
> In article <2IKdnesf-Pb9ZqzYnZ2dnUVZ_oydnZ2d@comcast.com>
> [email]n5hsr@comcast.net[/email] "n5hsr" writes:
>[color=green]
>> Three Cheers for Ronald Reagan. I just bought some 39 cent
>> stamps with his face on them.[/color]
>
> Logically, one should _use_ stamps bearing the faces of people
> one doesn't like. Think what happens during the postal process:
> a Mega-Nasty (and possibly politically adverse) Man comes along
> with a rubber stamp and bashes ink on the face of Beloved Hero.
>
> OTOH, if you just bought them to pin up and admire, that's okay.
> --
> Andrew Stephenson
>[/color]

Most cancellations are done by machine these days. What a way to irritate
your liberal aquantances but by mailing them something with Ronald Reagan on
it. They hate him almost as much as GWB. . . . "There you go again".

Charles of Schaumburg