OT Dims can't cheat in AZ

[url]http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/1020scotus-voterID20-ON.html[/url]

Photo ID's to vote OK in Arizona.

--

Scott in Florida

I'm sure Republicans will still find a way....


"Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
news:302jj2p23paa4p5p1g5fhdcb3kp0vfm8ub@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> [url]http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/1020scotus-voterID20-ON.html[/url]
>
> Photo ID's to vote OK in Arizona.
>
> --
>
> Scott in Florida
>[/color]

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:46:43 GMT, "Art"
<begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>I'm sure Republicans will still find a way....
>[/color]

Trying to find some reason for losing the upcoming election?




--

Scott in Florida

Scott in Florida wrote:[color=blue]
> [url]http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/1020scotus-voterID20-ON.html[/url]
>
> Photo ID's to vote OK in Arizona.
>
> --
>
> Scott in Florida[/color]

While I may not agree with Scott that election day cheating is a
one-party problem, I do agree with the lawmakers in AZ that a photo-id
should be required at the polls.

A much larger problem, though, is the lack of a paper trail from purely
electronic voting machines. My county went from a perfectly good
solution (optical mark cards, that are electronically read but are
retained for a paper trail) to a computer-based system that is easily
hacked.

On 22 Oct 2006 14:11:26 -0700, "ACAR" <getoutanpush@yahoo.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>
>Scott in Florida wrote:[color=green]
>> [url]http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/1020scotus-voterID20-ON.html[/url]
>>
>> Photo ID's to vote OK in Arizona.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Scott in Florida[/color]
>
>While I may not agree with Scott that election day cheating is a
>one-party problem, I do agree with the lawmakers in AZ that a photo-id
>should be required at the polls.
>
>A much larger problem, though, is the lack of a paper trail from purely
>electronic voting machines. My county went from a perfectly good
>solution (optical mark cards, that are electronically read but are
>retained for a paper trail) to a computer-based system that is easily
>hacked.[/color]

We are voting on an amendment in Florida that will REQUIRE a paper
trail on our electronic voting machines.

I shall vote FOR that amendment....


--

Scott in Florida

One needs a photo ID to rent a car or fly on a commercial aircraft, but all
the Dims in the US Congress are against requiring a photo ID to vote.
Hmmm, I wonder why? LOL


mike hunt


"Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:DUP_g.17523$UG4.16851@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...[color=blue]
> I'm sure Republicans will still find a way....
>
>
> "Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
> news:302jj2p23paa4p5p1g5fhdcb3kp0vfm8ub@4ax.com...[color=green]
>> [url]http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/1020scotus-voterID20-ON.html[/url]
>>
>> Photo ID's to vote OK in Arizona.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Scott in Florida
>>[/color]
>
>[/color]

Scott in Florida wrote:[color=blue]
> On 22 Oct 2006 14:11:26 -0700, "ACAR" <getoutanpush@yahoo.com> wrote:[/color]
[color=blue]
> We are voting on an amendment in Florida that will REQUIRE a paper
> trail on our electronic voting machines.
>
> I shall vote FOR that amendment....[/color]

That's the first sensible thing you've said about politics.

Mike Hunter wrote:
[color=blue]
> One needs a photo ID to rent a car or fly on a commercial aircraft, but all
> the Dims in the US Congress are against requiring a photo ID to vote.
> Hmmm, I wonder why? LOL[/color]

There's no constitutional right to rent a car or fly by air.

There's also a prohibition against poll taxes, and unless photo IDs are
available at no charge, they're a poll tax.

Art wrote:
[color=blue]
> I'm sure Republicans will still find a way....[/color]

As they did in the early 1960s with Operation Eagle Eye, where
Republican party workers dressed in police-like uniforms and
intimidated voters in South Phoenix. They'd introgate voters in line
about their literacy, knowledge of the US constitution, and even their
citizenship, and one of the organizers of this program was William
Rehnquist, future US Supreme Court Chief Justice.

On 22 Oct 2006 16:01:00 -0700, "larry moe 'n curly"
<larrymoencurly@my-deja.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>
>Mike Hunter wrote:
>[color=green]
>> One needs a photo ID to rent a car or fly on a commercial aircraft, but all
>> the Dims in the US Congress are against requiring a photo ID to vote.
>> Hmmm, I wonder why? LOL[/color]
>
>There's no constitutional right to rent a car or fly by air.[/color]

There is no constitutional right to vote, either.
[color=blue]
>
>There's also a prohibition against poll taxes, and unless photo IDs are
>available at no charge, they're a poll tax[/color]

Oh B/S......

You have to have a

--

Scott in Florida

"ACAR" <getoutanpush@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161551486.442686.112150@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...[color=blue]
>
> Scott in Florida wrote:[color=green]
>> [url]http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/1020scotus-voterID20-ON.html[/url]
>>
>> Photo ID's to vote OK in Arizona.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Scott in Florida[/color]
>
> While I may not agree with Scott that election day cheating is a
> one-party problem, I do agree with the lawmakers in AZ that a photo-id
> should be required at the polls.
>
> A much larger problem, though, is the lack of a paper trail from purely
> electronic voting machines. My county went from a perfectly good
> solution (optical mark cards, that are electronically read but are
> retained for a paper trail) to a computer-based system that is easily
> hacked.
>[/color]

The machines in NY produce paper records. But, we're funny about things like
that here.

"larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencurly@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1161561464.405730.34430@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...[color=blue]
>
> Art wrote:
>[color=green]
>> I'm sure Republicans will still find a way....[/color]
>
> As they did in the early 1960s with Operation Eagle Eye, where
> Republican party workers dressed in police-like uniforms and
> intimidated voters in South Phoenix. They'd introgate voters in line
> about their literacy, knowledge of the US constitution, and even their
> citizenship, and one of the organizers of this program was William
> Rehnquist, future US Supreme Court Chief Justice.
>[/color]

Based on literacy and knowledge of the constitution, the current president
would have felt nervous under that questioning.

JoeSpareBedroom, 10/23/2006, 2:51:34 PM,
<Wa8%g.3771$Ka1.654@news01.roc.ny> wrote:
[color=blue]
> The machines in NY[/color]

I used to live in Utica, NY. Where are you from?

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0estc6pfdnpy00f@news.readfreenews.net...[color=blue]
> JoeSpareBedroom, 10/23/2006, 2:51:34 PM,
> <Wa8%g.3771$Ka1.654@news01.roc.ny> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> The machines in NY[/color]
>
> I used to live in Utica, NY. Where are you from?[/color]

A different city.

JoeSpareBedroom, 10/23/2006, 3:00:41 PM,
<tj8%g.3772$Ka1.3770@news01.roc.ny> wrote:
[color=blue]
> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:xn0estc6pfdnpy00f@news.readfreenews.net...[color=green]
> > JoeSpareBedroom, 10/23/2006, 2:51:34 PM,
> ><Wa8%g.3771$Ka1.654@news01.roc.ny> wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> > > The machines in NY[/color]
> >
> > I used to live in Utica, NY. Where are you from?[/color]
>
> A different city.[/color]

Never heard of it.