Inaccruate speedometers... - Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums


» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums > Toyota USENET Discussion Groups > alt.autos.toyota

alt.autos.toyota General Toyota discussion newsgroup.

ToyotaNation.com is the premier Toyota Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-28-2006, 07:35 AM   #1 (permalink)
Big Blue
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
View Big Blue's Photo Gallery
Inaccruate speedometers...


I've been suspicious for some time, but now I've gone out to prove it.
I always though the speedometers on new cars are too fast than actual
speed, but now I've gone out and prove it.

I took my 1990 Corolla and drive 65 mph and have my wife drive our new
Camry 2007 SE V6 behind me. We talk over walkie-talkie. She told me
when my Corolla says 65 it says 70 mph on her Camry. Then I speed up
to 70 mph and the Camry, matching my speed, says 75-77mph. I slow
down to 50 mph and the Camry says 55 mph.

I did the same test drive on my 2000 Maxima, same result (Maxima
faster than Corolla at "same" speed)

Interesting huh?

 
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 10-28-2006, 08:04 AM   #2 (permalink)
Ghislain
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
View Ghislain's Photo Gallery
Re: Inaccruate speedometers...

Was the speedometer in your Corolla recently certified? If not, how do you
know that your 1990 Corolla is accurate?

"Big Blue" <aclaritan@gmail.com> wrote in message
[email]9fj6k2teeiapsgr7hvo0las8d7803bi402@4ax.com[/email]...[color=blue]
>
> I've been suspicious for some time, but now I've gone out to prove it.
> I always though the speedometers on new cars are too fast than actual
> speed, but now I've gone out and prove it.
>
> I took my 1990 Corolla and drive 65 mph and have my wife drive our new
> Camry 2007 SE V6 behind me. We talk over walkie-talkie. She told me
> when my Corolla says 65 it says 70 mph on her Camry. Then I speed up
> to 70 mph and the Camry, matching my speed, says 75-77mph. I slow
> down to 50 mph and the Camry says 55 mph.
>
> I did the same test drive on my 2000 Maxima, same result (Maxima
> faster than Corolla at "same" speed)
>
> Interesting huh?
>[/color]


 
Old 10-28-2006, 08:08 AM   #3 (permalink)
Wolfgang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
View Wolfgang's Photo Gallery
Re: Inaccruate speedometers...

Use a GPS to more accurately measure actual speed - not pacing with another
car.

"Big Blue" <aclaritan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9fj6k2teeiapsgr7hvo0las8d7803bi402@4ax.com...[color=blue]
>
> I've been suspicious for some time, but now I've gone out to prove it.
> I always though the speedometers on new cars are too fast than actual
> speed, but now I've gone out and prove it.
>
> I took my 1990 Corolla and drive 65 mph and have my wife drive our new
> Camry 2007 SE V6 behind me. We talk over walkie-talkie. She told me
> when my Corolla says 65 it says 70 mph on her Camry. Then I speed up
> to 70 mph and the Camry, matching my speed, says 75-77mph. I slow
> down to 50 mph and the Camry says 55 mph.
>
> I did the same test drive on my 2000 Maxima, same result (Maxima
> faster than Corolla at "same" speed)
>
> Interesting huh?
>[/color]


 
Old 10-28-2006, 08:51 AM   #4 (permalink)
Ray O
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
View Ray O's Photo Gallery
Re: Inaccruate speedometers...


"Ghislain" <ghislaing@teksavvyDOTcom> wrote in message
news:3vGdnXZvMezSyN7YnZ2dnUVZ_uidnZ2d@teksavvy.com...[color=blue]
> Was the speedometer in your Corolla recently certified? If not, how do you
> know that your 1990 Corolla is accurate?[/color]

Or look at it this way: if the Camry and the Maxima match and the Corolla
does not match, the vote is 2 to 1 that the Corolla's speedometer is
inaccurate, especially if the Corolla does not have the original factory
sized tires.
--

Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)[color=blue]
>
> "Big Blue" <aclaritan@gmail.com> wrote in message
> [email]9fj6k2teeiapsgr7hvo0las8d7803bi402@4ax.com[/email]...[color=green]
>>
>> I've been suspicious for some time, but now I've gone out to prove it.
>> I always though the speedometers on new cars are too fast than actual
>> speed, but now I've gone out and prove it.
>>
>> I took my 1990 Corolla and drive 65 mph and have my wife drive our new
>> Camry 2007 SE V6 behind me. We talk over walkie-talkie. She told me
>> when my Corolla says 65 it says 70 mph on her Camry. Then I speed up
>> to 70 mph and the Camry, matching my speed, says 75-77mph. I slow
>> down to 50 mph and the Camry says 55 mph.
>>
>> I did the same test drive on my 2000 Maxima, same result (Maxima
>> faster than Corolla at "same" speed)
>>
>> Interesting huh?
>>[/color]
>
>[/color]


 
Old 10-28-2006, 09:27 AM   #5 (permalink)
Ralph Mowery
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
View Ralph Mowery's Photo Gallery
Re: Inaccruate speedometers...


"Wolfgang" <NOwolfXgang_dieterxSPAM@NOXcox.netNOT> wrote in message
news:WBI0h.1117$2A4.16@newsfe24.lga...[color=blue]
> Use a GPS to more accurately measure actual speed - not pacing with
> another car.
>
>[/color]
That is what I use also. Used to use a watch with a second hand on it and
the mile markers on the interstate. On level ground the cruse control will
usually hold the speed steady enough to check the milage. I have also heard
the mile markers may not be exectally one mile either.


 
Old 10-28-2006, 09:47 AM   #6 (permalink)
CIL
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
View CIL's Photo Gallery
Re: Inaccruate speedometers...

Travel through South Carolina -- State Troopers will help you out. I got
stopped about 15years ago and told the trooper that my Speedometer said that
I was traveling 62 mph. He told me that I needed to get it checked as he
gave me a ticket for 72 in a 60.
I always made better time in that car than any other that I have owned.


"Big Blue" <aclaritan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9fj6k2teeiapsgr7hvo0las8d7803bi402@4ax.com...[color=blue]
>
> I've been suspicious for some time, but now I've gone out to prove it.
> I always though the speedometers on new cars are too fast than actual
> speed, but now I've gone out and prove it.
>
> I took my 1990 Corolla and drive 65 mph and have my wife drive our new
> Camry 2007 SE V6 behind me. We talk over walkie-talkie. She told me
> when my Corolla says 65 it says 70 mph on her Camry. Then I speed up
> to 70 mph and the Camry, matching my speed, says 75-77mph. I slow
> down to 50 mph and the Camry says 55 mph.
>
> I did the same test drive on my 2000 Maxima, same result (Maxima
> faster than Corolla at "same" speed)
>
> Interesting huh?
>[/color]


 
Old 10-28-2006, 10:48 AM   #7 (permalink)
Jeff Strickland
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
View Jeff Strickland's Photo Gallery
Re: Inaccruate speedometers...


"Big Blue" <aclaritan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9fj6k2teeiapsgr7hvo0las8d7803bi402@4ax.com...[color=blue]
>
> I've been suspicious for some time, but now I've gone out to prove it.
> I always though the speedometers on new cars are too fast than actual
> speed, but now I've gone out and prove it.
>
> I took my 1990 Corolla and drive 65 mph and have my wife drive our new
> Camry 2007 SE V6 behind me. We talk over walkie-talkie. She told me
> when my Corolla says 65 it says 70 mph on her Camry. Then I speed up
> to 70 mph and the Camry, matching my speed, says 75-77mph. I slow
> down to 50 mph and the Camry says 55 mph.
>
> I did the same test drive on my 2000 Maxima, same result (Maxima
> faster than Corolla at "same" speed)
>
> Interesting huh?
>[/color]

No. Not interesting at all. Sorry.

You are comparing a beat up old base-model car with a brand new
top-of-the-line car. In one, they throw a pile of pieces together and
proclaim, "it works, let's sell it," and in the other they go to great pains
to make sure the parts all work together just the way a driver might want
them to. The approach to building the car makes a big difference in what the
car tells you. And, if the Corolla came with tiny little tires, and somebody
along the ownership line opted for a larger tire, then the speedo would be
reading slow -- which is what yours is doing.

I'd give odds that the new cars are MUCH more accurate than your Corolla.
The actual way to test this is to set the cruise control and use a stopwatch
to time how long it takes to go a measured mile. Mile markers are placed at
half-mile intervals along the shoulder of the highway for this purpose.
(Well, the purpose they are there might be different, but they can be used
for this purpose.) As you pass a mile marker with the cruise set, click the
stop watch and keep your eyes peeled for the next marker at which point you
stop the watch.

Divide 3600 by the time it takes to go a mile, and the result is your actual
speed.

3600 / 65 = 55mph
3600 / 60 = 60mph
3600 / 51 = 70mph
3600 / 45 = 80mph


Due to the magic of mathematics, you can divide 3600 by your speed to
calculate the location of the next mile marker. Since you know that if you
pass the markers at 51 second intervals, then you are going 70. If you are
going 70, then you can calculate that the mile marker will appear 51 seconds
after the previous marker. If a marker is missing, the next marker should
appear after about 102 seconds. (Actually, 70 takes 51.4 seconds, so the
next marker after the missing one should come at closer to 103 seconds.)

I challenge you to run this test in your Corolla and your Camry and see
which speedo is more accurate. I suspect you will find that the Camry is
going 80 on the speedo, it is really doing about 77 on the ground. Given the
numbers you cited, the Corolla at 80 should be doing about 83 on the ground.
(I suggest you run the test at the legal speed limit, but your tolerance for
pain will dictate what speed(s) you actually test.) The cars that I own and
have tested are doing an actual 78.5 when the speedo reads 80.



 
Old 10-28-2006, 10:52 AM   #8 (permalink)
Jeff Strickland
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
View Jeff Strickland's Photo Gallery
Re: Inaccruate speedometers...


"Ralph Mowery" <rmowery28146@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:GNJ0h.506$LI4.412@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...[color=blue]
>
> "Wolfgang" <NOwolfXgang_dieterxSPAM@NOXcox.netNOT> wrote in message
> news:WBI0h.1117$2A4.16@newsfe24.lga...[color=green]
>> Use a GPS to more accurately measure actual speed - not pacing with
>> another car.
>>
>>[/color]
> That is what I use also. Used to use a watch with a second hand on it and
> the mile markers on the interstate. On level ground the cruse control
> will usually hold the speed steady enough to check the milage. I have
> also heard the mile markers may not be exectally one mile either.
>[/color]

Except for cases where the markers might be missing for whatever reason, I'd
guess that they are within 25 feet of being in the right place. Surely they
are in the right place by a margin that would not affect your speed /
stopwatch measurements.

Having said that, the GPS is an excellent way to validate the speedo's
accuracy. I use a stop watch because I'm a cheap bastard and never bought a
GPS to replace the one I've lost. I own several stop watches though (one is
actually an official stopwatch, not a feature of a wrist watch).


 
Old 10-28-2006, 11:08 AM   #9 (permalink)
Ed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
View Ed's Photo Gallery
Re: Inaccruate speedometers...

I've checked the odometer on my nearly brand new 2006 Sienna against my
Garmin 76CS GPS (extremely accurate). As posted about a month ago:

Odometer: 464.2
GPS: 469.86

Another poster noted that this might be purposely done by Toyota to
account for later tire wear - makes sense.

I've also noticed that the Sienna speedometer registers about one or two
mph higher than the GPS. Strange, because it's inversely related to the
data shown above.

Arthur Hass

Big Blue wrote:[color=blue]
> I've been suspicious for some time, but now I've gone out to prove it.
> I always though the speedometers on new cars are too fast than actual
> speed, but now I've gone out and prove it.
>
> I took my 1990 Corolla and drive 65 mph and have my wife drive our new
> Camry 2007 SE V6 behind me. We talk over walkie-talkie. She told me
> when my Corolla says 65 it says 70 mph on her Camry. Then I speed up
> to 70 mph and the Camry, matching my speed, says 75-77mph. I slow
> down to 50 mph and the Camry says 55 mph.
>
> I did the same test drive on my 2000 Maxima, same result (Maxima
> faster than Corolla at "same" speed)
>
> Interesting huh?
>[/color]
 
Old 10-28-2006, 12:07 PM   #10 (permalink)
Scott Schuckert
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
View Scott Schuckert's Photo Gallery
Re: Inaccruate speedometers...


Interesting that a couple of the posts mention speedometer readings
that just happen to be 3 MPH high. My 1997 Camry also reads 3 MPH high.

Curiously, it's constant, not proportional - as in 25 reads 28, and 55
reads 58.
 
Old 10-28-2006, 01:07 PM   #11 (permalink)
Mark
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
View Mark's Photo Gallery
Re: Inaccruate speedometers...

It's possible that the speedo is just pointing to 3 mph when the car is
at rest.


Scott Schuckert wrote:[color=blue]
> Interesting that a couple of the posts mention speedometer readings
> that just happen to be 3 MPH high. My 1997 Camry also reads 3 MPH high.
>
> Curiously, it's constant, not proportional - as in 25 reads 28, and 55
> reads 58.[/color]

 
Old 10-28-2006, 01:49 PM   #12 (permalink)
Jeff Strickland
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
View Jeff Strickland's Photo Gallery
Re: Inaccruate speedometers...


"Ed" <ed@ridersite.org> wrote in message
news:UcednQLEhtvDHd7YnZ2dnUVZ_omdnZ2d@comcast.com...[color=blue]
> I've checked the odometer on my nearly brand new 2006 Sienna against my
> Garmin 76CS GPS (extremely accurate). As posted about a month ago:
>
> Odometer: 464.2
> GPS: 469.86
>
> Another poster noted that this might be purposely done by Toyota to
> account for later tire wear - makes sense.
>
> I've also noticed that the Sienna speedometer registers about one or two
> mph higher than the GPS. Strange, because it's inversely related to the
> data shown above.
>
> Arthur Hass
>[/color]


Your experience is the mathematical affect of having a speedo (odometer
actually) that is 98.8% accurate. I give that one high marks.

 
Old 10-28-2006, 01:52 PM   #13 (permalink)
Jeff Strickland
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
View Jeff Strickland's Photo Gallery
Re: Inaccruate speedometers...

I'm not sure, but I think the error is more accurately expressed as a
percent than an absolute. My guess is that the speedo is off by 2% (or
whatever) and at high speed, this is 3 mph, but at city traffic speeds, the
error is more like 1.5mph.



"Scott Schuckert" <not@aol.com> wrote in message
news:281020061307352696%not@aol.com...[color=blue]
>
> Interesting that a couple of the posts mention speedometer readings
> that just happen to be 3 MPH high. My 1997 Camry also reads 3 MPH high.
>
> Curiously, it's constant, not proportional - as in 25 reads 28, and 55
> reads 58.[/color]

 
Old 10-28-2006, 02:45 PM   #14 (permalink)
Mark
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
View Mark's Photo Gallery
Re: Inaccruate speedometers...

What really bugs me is inaccurate spelling...

Big Blue wrote:[color=blue]
> I've been suspicious for some time, but now I've gone out to prove it.
> I always though the speedometers on new cars are too fast than actual
> speed, but now I've gone out and prove it.
>
> I took my 1990 Corolla and drive 65 mph and have my wife drive our new
> Camry 2007 SE V6 behind me. We talk over walkie-talkie. She told me
> when my Corolla says 65 it says 70 mph on her Camry. Then I speed up
> to 70 mph and the Camry, matching my speed, says 75-77mph. I slow
> down to 50 mph and the Camry says 55 mph.
>
> I did the same test drive on my 2000 Maxima, same result (Maxima
> faster than Corolla at "same" speed)
>
> Interesting huh?[/color]

 
Old 10-28-2006, 11:54 PM   #15 (permalink)
SoCalMike
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
View SoCalMike's Photo Gallery
Re: Inaccruate speedometers...

Ed wrote:[color=blue]
> I've checked the odometer on my nearly brand new 2006 Sienna against my
> Garmin 76CS GPS (extremely accurate). As posted about a month ago:
>
> Odometer: 464.2
> GPS: 469.86[/color]

the GPS is constantly bouncing signals off satellites, so "as the crow
flies" would be an apt analogy.

your odo is measured by the rubber actually meeting the road.[color=blue]
>
> Another poster noted that this might be purposely done by Toyota to
> account for later tire wear - makes sense.[/color]
 
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
 

  Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums > Toyota USENET Discussion Groups > alt.autos.toyota

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is Off
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Minor scratches on speedometers plastic cover Billzebub 2nd Generation (2005+) 11 09-02-2008 06:32 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:56 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
ToyotaNation.com is an independent Toyota/Lexus enthusiast website. ToyotaNation.com is not sponsored by or in any way affiliated with Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. The Toyota, Lexus and Scion names and logos are trademarks owned by Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.